Now, obviously, this is dramatic and a little crazy. The lady doesn't have to wear Louboutin's shoes, and she's likely wearing them for status, because she's at a fancy party with fancy people and she wants to fit in and show the world, "heck yeah, I too can drop a grand on bunion-causing, back-breaking, almost stripper-looking platform-stiletto shoes. I'm just like you!"
But more importantly, in my opinion, Louboutin should make less agony-inducing heels. And until he does, trend-setting women and celebrities should stop wearing them. Because it is downright anti-sisterhood to continue to perpetuate this myth that women need to be teetering dangerously on a fourth+ inch spike of plastic in order to look sexy or pulled together. It's total crap, but men buy into it, then we buy into it and then suddenly our collective aesthetic changes and we start to feel frumpy when we're walking around in something comfortable (which doesn't mean ugly!).
So I applaud that brazen lady at the Cannes party. I just kind of wish she had thrown the heels at him. Or made him wear them.
Source: NYDN
Related:
12 weeks of wardrobe tough love: #1 stop wearing square-toe shoes
How much would you spend on shoes?
...But sometimes they must wear heels
