Fashion + Beauty
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Fashion that makes us sad: The $600 'Where the Wild Things Are' playsuit
editor
File this one under: Things I
will never understand. Slick, high-fashion retailer Opening
Ceremony is currently selling this plush, monster-inspired,
adult playsuit for $610. It's part of the
international boutique's collaboration with "Where
the Wild Things Are" director Spike Jonze, a collection that
also includes
Flintstone-esque furry vests ($415),
horn-adorned sweatshirts ($460), and a fluffy, faux-fur
cavegirl dress ($460).
From the press release:
"The line features a full range of faux fur pieces for both
men and women, subtly evoking Max’s crew of wild friends...The line
even includes Max’s iconic one-piece playsuit – complete with
furry-eared hood and raccoon tail.”
Really? Can anyone explain to me how/why any grown-ass human would
want to dress up as a stuffed animal? Is this a nod to the
Furry/Plushy sex fetish phenomenon? Or just as completely
lame/misguided/"rich hipsters will waste their money on
anything" as I'm imagining?
Oof.
Related: where the wild things are, stupid fashion, spike jonze, expensive crap
-
Posted by Laurel Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:04am PDT
Ok...when I was a kid I had these fuzzy pj's with feet in them and I have always wanted a pair now. An adult pair!!!! This new creation/costume is WONDERFUL!!!! But unreasonable at $600.
Report Abuse
-
Posted by Shoujo Robot Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:14am PDT
What the....WHAT ARE YOU COMPLAINING ABOUT?! THIS IS FANTASTIC! I'm ordering seven of those right now!! You, Jennifer Romalini, have ABSOLUTELY NO imagination.
"Or just as completely lame/misguided/"rich hipsters will waste their money on anything" as I'm imagining?" -- Yeah, because I'm sure you're the oracle of fashion taste and have an impeccable record of quality and standards.
Don't crap on other people's good time. And I say that glaring at your overpriced designer potato sacks you call clothes that I'm sure completely lame/misguided/rich b!tches (such as yourself) throw your money away on.
Touche.
Report Abuse
-
Posted by Cranberry Lips Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:14am PDT
If it didn't had the tail and was made of flannel, I would buy it over the Snuggie any day of the week! :)
Report Abuse
-
-
Posted by Katie L Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:28am PDT
I always wanted a suit that would be this cute. >.< just no footsies.. thats what socks are for.
Report Abuse
-
Posted by Jennifer Romolini, Shine staff Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:35am PDT
Whoa, Shoujo Robot! The anger, the anger-- simmer it down. You're absolutely right, if folks want to pay $600 to dress up as stuffed animals, it's a free country. But, man, that just seems like a lot of dough to spend on what is essentially a faux-fur Halloween costume. Also, you spelled my name wrong. And, in other news, I own no such expensive potato sacks because I'm cheap and, really, despite my strong opinions about this particular monster-inspired collection, more of a nice person than a b---- .
Report Abuse
-
-
Posted by HuneysuckleLuv Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:55am PDT
I want one. I'll pay 1200 for it. .....ok, I'm kidding.
You can wear that in the office right?
Report Abuse
-
Posted by Micah Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:24am PDT
While I don't have any beef with people dressing up like fuzzy animals--I'm just the kind of weirdo who would wear this sort of garb around the house for fun--I have to file this one under "Is Nothing Sacred?/Sick of Money-Grubbing Marketers". Couldn't somebody come up with their OWN fuzzy creature suits instead of using Max and his monsters? Feeling jaded.
Report Abuse
-
Posted by Shoujo Robot Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:41am PDT
Alright, so I apologize for the name spelling, that was thanks to the font display on my monitor. And well...assuming that you buy extravagantly expensive outfits yourself.
But hey, you can't call out people who buy what is essentially a collector's item, just because an ADULT can wear it. That's unfair. You've basically legitimized SOME forms of ludicrous spending, while singling out something that doesn't necessarily mean a fashion trend. Dropping $600 on ANYTHING is silly, furry costume or no.
So I think it would have been better to take it from the angle of "Should it cost so much?" or "Would you buy it?" rather than "Wow! Look at the stupid things stupid people buy!"
Just saying.
Report Abuse