Should Miss California lose her crown over topless photos?

From the Community…

• 
  Posted by MrsKlingonPasadena Tue May 5, 2009 2:43pm PDT

  No. Nudity is art...at least it is to me. But she needs to stop talking now. She is being a publicity w----.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by Sandy Tue May 5, 2009 2:45pm PDT

  Personally, I am tired of her attitude of "I will be what God wants me to be as it suits me." I am okay with her not supporting homosexuality as that is her belief, but she said she doesn't support it because it isn't God's way. Was it God's way for her to have the Miss California people pay for her to have fake breasts that God himself didn't give her? I am okay with her photo that was released. It isn't any worse than a Victoria's Secret Model. The fact that people are saying it is to belittle her Christianity is ridiculous. But, she did lie on the application. The application asks if they have done anything risque, such as nude or partially nude photos. The new picture is a partially nude photo. Doesn't God want us to tell the truth always? She angered a bunch of people with her anti-homosexuality comments which were then fueled by Perez Hilton so people are taking shots at her. If she would quit fueling the fire by responding, these things would be laid to rest. I am just insanely tired of the whole Miss California debacle.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by sunny Tue May 5, 2009 3:04pm PDT

  Here's the thing. Anything a Christian does that is a mistake is going to be harshly judged because Christians believe what Jesus taught. And Christians are supposed to live like Jesus did and live according to what He taught. He did not promote homosexuality, he did not promote promiscuity -- but He loved those who did those things. As should Christians.

  Unfortunately, Christians aren't perfect like Christ was, and shouldn't claim to be. If Christians believe what Jesus taught, then their opinions will be based on what Jesus taught. Christians opinion of gay marriage will be that it's wrong, just as the Bible says.

  Carrie Prejean will be judged on this in the light that she's a Christian, and she will be called a hypocrite. But she was 17, and maybe at a different point in her life then. There are Christians who don't walk what they talk, and they should be called out, at the time. Thankfully, God forgives us for our past, and if she is the Christian she says she is, she has asked for forgiveness.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by David K Tue May 5, 2009 3:22pm PDT

  Hey, shes got all of the media attention anyways because of all this and the liberals are jealous of her and pi$$ed because she's so hot and they're not!

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by Thera Tue May 5, 2009 3:33pm PDT

  No, they should keep her, her hyprocrisy, and her silicon.

  And the anti-gay group which made her their spokesperson should not be allowed to get rid of her, her hypocrisy, and her silicon, that easy.

  This is your 'face' - deal with it.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by springtime Tue May 5, 2009 3:42pm PDT

  No. But someone needs to put a muzzle on her... and David K. She clearly is not the swiftest bird in flight. This is not about jealously. Far from it.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by Doktor Eevol Tue May 5, 2009 3:47pm PDT

  This isn't about her freedom of speech, her beliefs, or being perfect.

  This is about her attitude and behavior.

  For those who can't tell the difference, no amount of explaining it will matter. People are going to believe what they want to believe. People *want* to believe that she is being persecuted. People *want* to believe that Christianity is under fire. People *want* to believe she is a great person, even though her behavior has been whiny, ungrateful, deceptive, entitled, and manipulative.

  She signed a contract stating that nude or partially nude photos of herself would be grounds for disqualification. She admitted to taking the photos. So for once, she may have to take some responsibility for her behavior. Good, it's about time.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by Angel Morbid Tue May 5, 2009 4:05pm PDT

  I second the motion for David K's muzzle...lol

  I agree with Thera, springtime, and Doktor Eevol. Great answers all of you especially Doktor, she signed the contract, violated its terms and conditions and should be disqualified.

  I don't give a d@mn whether she's Christian, "hot" or any of that crap.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by Nini Poo Tue May 5, 2009 5:04pm PDT

  I'm with the majority so far... She needs to shut her mouth-- so does Dave K. Her "holier than thou" attitude is a little too much for such a HUGE hypocrite. She lied when signing her contract-- that's against "God's word", isn't it?

  It all doesn't surprise me in the least. She'll go to church on Sunday, ask for forgiveness and feel better about herself. Then the following week, she'll choose which of God's rules she'll want to live by again, then ask for forgiveness again. A cycle which will never end. BUT, oh my goodness, let's condemn all the gays please....

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by Nini Poo Tue May 5, 2009 5:05pm PDT

  oh, and please enlighten yourselves with her pics... http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/gallery/carrie-prejean-nude/

  By the way, if she was 17 at the time the pics were taken, isn't that illegal?

  Report Abuse