Fashion + Beauty

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Related Topics:

Today in Photoshop: Gisele's pregnancy just *poof* disappeared!

So, Gisele's pregnant. She hasn't said it, but everyone kind of knows it's true. However, Gisele is also the face of raincoat retailer London Fog's fall campaign and the company, according to WWD, wanted to ramp up its image this season with sexy ads.

So what to do? Show a pregnant lady wearing a trench coat? Naw. Not steamy enough! Instead, London Fog put Gisele in some underwear, belted a jacket over her, took some pictures, and then airbrushed out both the underwear and the Brazilian model's entire stomach. The result, as you can see at left, is kind of...weird. Gisele's midsection looks creepily smooth, like Silly Putty when you first take it out of the egg, like a synthetic fleshy substitute that may not be able to lift images from newspapers, like a Ken doll's nether regions.

A spokesperson from Iconix Brand Group, the company that owns London Fog, told WWD that the campaign was shot a few weeks ago and Gisele's visibly pregnant tummy was retouched to “respect her privacy.”

Really? Because having your underwear digitally removed and a sliver of a logo placed over your smoothed-out crotch  is so private? Personally, I think it would've been badass and not so stupid, anorexic-fashion-industry-typical to leave Ms. Bündchen's very pretty, very tiny baby bump in the ad along with the very pretty, very tiny panties too. But that's just me. The ads will appear in the October issues of magazines like ELLE, Glamour, and Vogue.
Source: WWD, NYMag

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 89
  • Jasmine's Avatar
    Posted by Jasmine Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:26am PDT

    I can't believe her ribs are still showing in that last pic.

    Report Abuse
  • StephanieL's Avatar
    Posted by StephanieL Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:46am PDT

    So who cares? She isn't the first to be photoshopped, and she won't be the last. Being pregnant doesn't fit the ad, and if Gisele agreed to it why does it matter? If she doesn't want to disclose her pregnancy then that's her business!

    And by the company saying it was to "protect her privacy", they meant her personal situation, not her sexual body parts! Don't misconstrue that to make it sound as bad as you think it is.

    The most you see in this picture is her pubic bone and some side boob. It's not like we haven't seen anything worse.

    If she doesn't want to reveal her pregnancy, or lack thereof, that's her business. Let her do her job without being nit-picked over photoshop.

    Report Abuse
  • HuneysuckleLuv's Avatar
    Posted by HuneysuckleLuv Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:04am PDT

    I love Giselle....wish we could see her as she is.

    Report Abuse
  • Rebekah's Avatar
    Posted by Rebekah Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:28am PDT

    Jeez...looks like it belongs on photoshop disasters (funniest blog ever).

    Report Abuse
  • Kellie's Avatar
    Posted by Kellie Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:10am PDT

    Leaving the baby bump and doing a photoshop on her face would have been the better ad!!

    Report Abuse
  • HawkeyeGirl's Avatar
    Posted by HawkeyeGirl Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:11am PDT

    Wow, that's creepy. I totally understand if she wants to keep her pregnancy private, but that photoshopping job is awful! She looks like an enuch or something in her pelvic area-just unnatural.

    Report Abuse
  • Christine's Avatar
    Posted by Christine Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:55am PDT

    Just think of how ridiculous this will look 10 years from now when PhotoShop is a million times better

    Report Abuse
  • V.H's Avatar
    Posted by V.H Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:54pm PDT

    I kinda thought she was wearing some kind of tights, you know like chorus girls do. The kind that are super shiny and super tight to 'hold it all in'.

    Report Abuse
  • Tamara's Avatar
    Posted by Tamara Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:07pm PDT

    I think maybe she should have embraced motherhood and had her baby bump.... but then agian if this was made for a certain product then yeah it should be photoshopped. Besides what celebrity hasn't been?

    Report Abuse
  • Tracie A's Avatar
    Posted by Tracie A Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:59pm PDT

    They definitely shouldn't have photoshopped her baby bump and underwear. It totally defeats the purpose and the photoshop is done poorly. I hope this ad is re-touched again before it appears in Elle, Glamour, and Vogue.

    Signed,

    Concerned Fashionista :(

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 89

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Herbal Essences Sweeps

Play our style it, wear it, try to win it* sweeps for a chance to win one of hundreds of prizes.