Entertainment

From the Community…

• 
  Posted by setare khanume khoshgel :D Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:24pm PDT

  it's crazy.crazy and stupid

  why and how would some people let themselves to judge about every F ing thing of someone???

  why are beauty and sexiness aaaaaaaaalll that this tabloids think about?

  why dont they let a poor celebrity be what she is and stunn her talent?

  stupid

  hope they undrestand how stupid they are!

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by Liz H Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:33pm PDT

  What a shame it is how society is obsessed with "looks" and what is only physicaly relevent on the outside of an individual, especially among celebrities. Maxim is a a leading magazine synonomous with "stylish" and identifies what is HOT right now, but was it really necessary to name an "unsexiest woman"? Maxim always has some sexy bombshell on the cover and the glossy pages reflect the same image. But again these are just physical features which only reflect what digital touch-ups are capable of performing. A magazine of such caliber should present itself with a littler more dignity than to name an "unsexiest woman" and begin to acknowledge talent, self confidence, and inner beauty. I think it is a little too late for Maxim to try and make good, and if getting her mole removed makes her feel beautiful and confident, than good for her.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by K T Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:48pm PDT

  I think Sarah is great. She's your normal girl who transformed herself into a fashion icon. She may be not be your classic beauty, but she is very attractive, intelligent, talented and interesting. I'd rather go to lunch with Sarah than with an airhead beauty like Paris Hilton.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by JosieM111 Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:04pm PDT

  Maxim is definitely trying to save face.

  Suck it, Maxim.

  JSP rules.

  J.

  http://www.lifeofjosiem.com

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by laidback/229 Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:11pm PDT

  guess she was tired of that thing, no?

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by D J Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:28pm PDT

  I dont care what any magazine printed... She is damn ugly mole or no mole... Horse faced ugo!!!

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by Jude Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:30pm PDT

  What is a shame is when there are those that take such ratings seriously. Beauty has always been in the eyes of the beholder. The opinions of those that write for Maxim count about as much as any adolescent boys perspective. After all, that is the level of intellect and the values that they clearly hold. Hardly worth batting an eye at.

  I do hope that the media had nothing to do with her mole removal. Cindy Crawford was known for her mole. SJP would have never reached where she is today if she were not well above the ordinary beauty queen of High School Football games.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by carole8 Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:56pm PDT

  So...Maxim is a magazine?...Sounds more like sanitary napkins...

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by michelle r Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:12pm PDT

  a magazine who names an unsexiest star has bad taste..very childish

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by Roger Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:27pm PDT

  yes, it is a shame we are so obessesed with looks....

  still doesn't change the fact that Maxim nailed it when they called her "unsexy". She has a face that looks like a foot. The only reason she is somewhat talked about is because of out celebrity/looks obessed culture and that stupid "...City." show.

  Report Abuse