Healthy Living

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Are plastics harming your health? 4 facts to help you decide

Are the chemicals in your plastic food containers, water bottles and even baby bottles harming your health? I guess I’m not sure anymore.

The risks are not something I really want to take a chance with. Recently the Food and Drug Administration said that a chemical widely used in plastics is safe for children and adults, even though recent research has raised questions about its safety. Studies have linked the chemical bisphenol-A, or BPA, to increased risks for heart disease and diabetes, according to The New York Times, and to the development of precancerous lesions and reproductive issues in animals.

I realize that plastic food containers, reusable water bottles and plastic baby bottles are so popular because they’re convenient. Which is not to be overlooked. But the price of convenience might have a dark side.

I used the facts from an article in a recent issue of EatingWell magazine to help me decide whether to replace my plastic containers with glass or another non-leaching option. Check out these four facts to decide for yourself:

1. Polycarbonate plastics, often used to make reusable water bottles, clear plastic food-storage containers and some baby bottles, contain BPA, an estrogenlike chemical also used in the linings of some food and drink cans. Studies link BPA to the development of precancerous lesions and abnormal development of reproductive systems in animals. While BPA can leach into food and drinks, whether it actually affects human health is currently not known. However, consumer concern peaked in April after the National Toxicology Program (part of the National Institutes of Health) issued a draft report noting that, given the current science, the possibility couldn’t be ruled out.

2. What is known is that we’re all exposed to plenty of the chemical. In a 2005 study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control, 95 percent of people screened tested positive for BPA.

3. Hot liquids and foods exacerbate leaching in BPA-containing plastics, suggests a study published earlier this year in Toxicology Letters. When researchers poured boiling water into polycarbonate drinking bottles, it caused up to 55 times more BPA to seep out than room-temperature water had.

4. Whether washing containers in hot water causes them to break down and release BPA the next time they’re used isn’t clear: Only a handful of studies have been conducted, and results are conflicting. While heating these plastics in the microwave hasn’t been studied, it’s not recommended. Anila Jacob, M.D., a scientist with the Environmental Working Group, says that we can assume there is increased leaching with any kind of heating.

The Bottom Line: Manufacturers currently aren’t required to label BPA, so there’s no way of knowing if it’s present in the plastics or cans you use. For now, the best way to reduce your exposure is to use stainless steel, glass or plastics labeled “BPA-free.” If you’re not sure about a product contact the manufacturer for more information.

Are you concerned about plastics? Share your thoughts here.

Interested in living greener? Find more information to help you make healthy choices:

By Michelle Edelbaum

Michelle is the associate editor of interactive for EatingWell Media Group. In between editing and writing, she enjoys sampling the tasty results of the easy, healthy recipes that the EatingWell Test Kitchen cooks are working on.



Related Links from EatingWell:

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 127
  • cook3932's Avatar
    Posted by cook3932 Fri Sep 19, 2008 3:24pm PDT

    I am concerned about this. However, if everything that was contaminated or had the potential to be harmful in the future were taken off the market there might not be much left. I always had and loved glassware, until I cut my hand severely while washing dishes.Since that happened I buy plastic. I guess if I had a child I would do away with potentially harmful plastics. Being in my "later years" and only worrying about myself, I won't worry all that much.

    Report Abuse
  • Carl E's Avatar
    Posted by Carl E Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:16am PDT

    Thanks for the info. This makes me wonder about silicone getting into our bodies through all the new silicone utensils and baked goods. This concern has stopped me from buying any. I know it causes problems with breast enhancements. Do you have any info on silicone and food?

    Report Abuse
  • Scott's Avatar
    Posted by Scott Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:22am PDT

    BPA is identified in polycarbonate plastic (hard rigid plastic containers). BPA is not found in PET bottles (Water, soda purchased at the stores come in PET bottles). The bottle you show is a standard store purchased bottle of water, PET bottle.

    Why would you show a PET bottle when talking about BPA?

    Report Abuse
  • ForestMamma's Avatar
    Posted by ForestMamma Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:28am PDT

    I am sure it's a possibility that were are getting exposed to BPA and it's bad for us. Am I going to panic? No. We are exposed to chemical from cars, second hand smoke, our pots and pans, chemicals on our rugs mean to PROTECT us. Unless we are supposed to hide in a cave like hermits, all we can to is eat right,and do our best. Whatever will be, will be.

    Report Abuse
  • Dina-sewer's Avatar
    Posted by Dina-sewer Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:33am PDT

    I read this article for four facts regarding the safety of drinking and eating from plastics. The only facts contained in this article are: 1. Some plastics contain PBA.

    2. Heat exacerbates release of PBA.

    3. 95% of people tested have been exposed to PBA.

    As the article stated, everything else regarding PBA and safety is unconclusive, hasn't been proven yet, or studies haven't positively shown its effects as of yet. All these phrases are very pland and certainly not "facts".

    These "four facts" were not actual facts and haven't helped me decide a

    single thing about PBA's safety.

    Report Abuse
  • Dina-sewer's Avatar
    Posted by Dina-sewer Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:39am PDT

    Of course, most of us are concerned about our health. This article gave us nothing to help make any decisions regarding PBA and its safety in drinking bottles. The four facts were missing in this article other than PBA is in plastic, it leaks out when heated, 95% of people have been exposed to it. This hardly helps me decide anything and certainly wouldn't make me change my practices -- or read any other articles by this "unfactual" author.

    Report Abuse
  • gomama's Avatar
    Posted by gomama Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:46am PDT

    I read an article not too long ago that gave information on what kind of plastics actually contain BPA. It stated that platics with the recyclable code of 3, 6, or 7 contained BPA. I threw away all plastic eating and drinking ware with those codes.

    Report Abuse
  • Deaconvet's Avatar
    Posted by Deaconvet Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:51am PDT

    That is why bottled water is actually worse for you that tap water. Plastic are labeled from 1 to 7 in a trangle on the bottom or side for the quality and quantity of PETROLEUM in the plastic, 1 being the lowest quality. So, you high acidity and oil in the water you drink from commercial bottled drinks. Check out www.ceramic-source.com

    Report Abuse
  • 's Avatar
    Posted by Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:12am PDT

    This is nothing more than malice media sensationalism. Thanks, you have taken a perfectly safe product that’s been on the market for over 50 years and have used media sensationalism to distort the truth about it’s safety in order to sell papers. I like how you say that there according to National Toxicology Program (part of the National Institutes of Health) issued a draft report noting that, given the current science, the possibility couldn’t be ruled out. What you should be reporting is that the amounts BPA released from these products is so small compared to the levels used during research studies on animals, that scientists are positive that these containers are harmless to the general public. What are the levels of BPA used on test animals as compared to the average amount found in humans?

    This is nothing more than consumer terrorism.

    Report Abuse
  • 's Avatar
    Posted by Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:15am PDT

    This is nothing more than malice media sensationalism. Thanks, you have taken a perfectly safe product that’s been on the market for over 50 years and have used media sensationalism to distort the truth about it’s safety in order to sell papers. I like how you say that there according to National Toxicology Program (part of the National Institutes of Health) issued a draft report noting that, given the current science, the possibility couldn’t be ruled out. What you should be reporting is that the amounts BPA released from these products is so small compared to the levels used during research studies on animals, that scientists are positive that these containers are harmless to the general public. What are the levels of BPA used on test animals as compared to the average amount found in humans?

    This is nothing more than consumer terrorism.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 127

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Health Byte

You know you need to hydrate. But is the water you're drinking safe? Here are 7 ways to be sure your water's fit for you.