Healthy Living

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Do you need an antioxidant supplement?

Do you take antioxidant supplements? New research published in the Cochrane Review suggests they might not be as helpful as you think, refuting the long-held belief that antioxidants may help prevent heart disease or cancer.

Investigators from Copenhagen University Hospital conducted a meta-analysis of existing studies, pertaining to more than 200,000 people, and found that antioxidant supplements--vitamins A, C, and E; beta-carotene; and selenium--do not prevent heart disease or cancer, do not forestall death, and may even increase mortality risk slightly.

But the phrase "may increase mortality risk slightly" is important to put any risk in context. Given the large pool of people analyzed, researchers would have noticed right away if there was any significant risk of death associated with the supplements. So if all we have is a hint of modest harm, the risk is clearly quite small.

This finding is disappointing and counter-intuitive. How can antioxidant supplements fail to help us and maybe even harm us slightly?

There are several likely answers. First, we may have the doses wrong. Just because some of a thing is good does not mean more is better. Second, maybe we have the wrong combinations. Antioxidants in foods come packaged with many other nutrients, and they all work together. When we separate that harmony, we may wind up with sour notes. Third, the participants in most of these trials were already ill. Perhaps antioxidants have different effects before chronic disease begins. They might even help prevent disease if taken earlier.

In general, my advice about a supplement is to remember it's not a substitute for a healthy diet and lifestyle. Use supplements thoughtfully. Talk to your doctor to be sure there is a sound reason, tailored to your health, for each one you take. Don’t assume that just because a clever ad makes a supplement sound good that it truly is.

I take an Omega-3 fish oil supplement every day, and recommend the same for most of my patients. I believe a multivitamin or mineral supplement is a good idea for many of us, despite a lack of research that shows a clear benefit. (I also like a supplement called Juice Plus, which compresses the nutrients from fruits and vegetables into capsule form, while preserving their native proportions.)

Based on the science we have at present, there is no reason to fear any antioxidant supplements you may have been taking--the potential for harm is minimal. But remember: No pill bottle holds an alternative for a healthy, active lifestyle.


Be a Smart Supplement Consumer
4 Best Supplements for Gorgeous Skin
Do Weight Loss Supplements Work?
Anti-Aging Secrets

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 212
  • tsull325's Avatar
    Posted by tsull325 Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:10pm PDT

    Complete 100 percent B.S., another study done by the medical profession to rid the world of vitamins so people will buy pharmaceuticals, since the medical industry is tied to the pharmacy industry. There have been hundreds of research articles and hard science done showing the benefits of daily multi-vitamin intake.

    I wish Yahoo! would get out of the back pocket of the pharmacy industry.

    Report Abuse
  • dennis's Avatar
    Posted by dennis Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:13pm PDT

    i think your full of s---

    Report Abuse
  • whizkidrealtor's Avatar
    Posted by whizkidrealtor Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:14pm PDT

    Official Company Communication

    Position: Antioxidants and Antioxidant Vitamins Provide Health Benefits

    Subject: Response to February 28, 2007 JAMA article that states that antioxidants do not prevent and may increase the risk of mortality.

    Background: On February 28, 2007 the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published a meta-analysis that assessed the effect of β-carotene, vitamins A, E, C, and selenium (either alone or in some combination), on all-cause mortality.1 The meaning and relevance of all-cause mortality is unclear, even to the study authors. The study authors admit not knowing what the actual causes of death in the individuals in the trials. This absence of information raises doubt about the validity and relevance of their findings because literally all-cause death means death from any and all causes, including accidents.

    Official Statement: The authors (Bjelakovic et al.) misuse meta-analytical methods to make conclusions that mislead and confuse healthy consumers.

    Pharmanex recognizes that today’s consumers want to make informed decisions pertaining to their health and the products that promote a healthy lifestyle. To support our distributors and customers, Pharmanex is, and always has been committed to providing scientifically substantiated, safe and efficacious products. We do not rely on a single study to guide product development and we reaffirm the critical role that antioxidant supplementation plays in health and wellness.

    There are times when a scientific study is publicized in national media and more often than not, the study is not placed within context and conclusions are drawn without careful consideration of the study design or objective. In the case of the recent meta-analysis published in JAMA, the research contains several important flaws that make the conclusions less applicable to the general population:

    • The researchers reviewed studies that used different diseased populations and different supplements. Most importantly, the review is a retrospective look at these studies and assumes that they were all conducted under identical conditions. This is not so. This meta-analysis, which seems to be a predetermined conclusion in search of a method to support it, will inappropriately confuse and alarm consumers who can benefit from supplementing with antioxidants.

    • Overall, the study authors conclude that there was no effect of antioxidant supplements on all-cause mortality. Only after the researchers divided the chosen clinical trials into “high risk bias” and “low risk bias” groups, using their own criteria, did they observe a statistically significant effect on mortality.

    • The dosages and chemical forms of the supplements used in the reviewed studies were not consistent with those shown by scientific research to be the most effective. In fact, the authors included a study that used an extremely high dose of Vitamin A (25,000 IU). The Pharmanex approach is never to maximize the amount of a particular antioxidant but instead to consider the whole antioxidant network for optimizing daily intake of antioxidants.

    • Several of the studies used diseased populations with high mortality risk. For example, it included patients with coronary heart diseases, cancer, hepatitis and elderly medical patients in nursing homes. Such populations present a complex problem for analysis and to draw firm conclusions.

    • In the process of selecting the 68 studies included in their meta-analysis, the authors excluded over 400 studies in which no serious lethal events. occurred. While the authors acknowledged this omission in their review, they did not acknowledge the probability that this may skew their analysis and conclusions.

    • The researchers’ conclusions ignore a large body of recent literature that supports the use of multi-antioxidant/multi-nutrient supplements.

    • The study’s conclusions are in direct conflict with a 2006 report from Johns Hopkins University which concluded “we find no convincing evidence to suggest vitamin E supplement use increases the risk of death per se.”

    Educated consumers must always look into the details of a study to determine if the proper steps were followed to ensure accurate results that can be applied to a larger population.

    Pharmanex can confidently say that the LifePak® family of products provides a comprehensive blend of antioxidant vitamins, mineral cofactors, and a comprehensive blend of carotenoids and flavonoids to promote the body’s overall antioxidant network. Unlike the antioxidant doses used in the studies included in the JAMA meta-analysis, LifePak® provides safe levels of all of its antioxidants and other nutrients in accordance with established guidelines. Most importantly, the benefits of LifePak® are evident in the millions of Pharmanex customers who have incorporated the supplement into their nutrition regimen and recognize the important health benefits of our product.

    For More Information: http://www.crnusa.org/PR07_JAMA_antioxidant_metaanalysis_022707.html

    Contributors: Created by: Glenn Chenney/Kara Schneck 2/27/07

    Reviewed by: Jennifer Engemann/John Beeson 2/27/07

    Approved by: Joe Chang 2/28/07

    Report Abuse
  • femme fatal's Avatar
    Posted by femme fatal Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:15pm PDT

    Exactly. Taking supplements in pill form means they have to mega dose you due to the pill not absorbing. That is why my family uses VitaMist spray vitamins. They don't mega dose you and are light years ahead on their formulations. Spray Vitamins are the purest most effective way to take your vitamins. Good Health- Aaron Flint

    Report Abuse
  • Virginia's Avatar
    Posted by Virginia Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:16pm PDT

    I don't agree with this... with so many foods that are on the market, and are not monitored only sprayed for spoiled food preparation.. how many times are we going to get sick off of the food distributed throughout the United States, with all of the bacteria even reaching into the meat market today. Although I agree not taking so many.. Therefore, don't tell me that there is something wrong with multivitamins, when there is nothing done to intact safety among our food industry. Thanks for the warning but no thanks.. Our government IS NOT DEPENDABLE when it comes to good, safe, about anything anymore.

    And it's up to our own devices to counter attack any future shortages of food... we must exercise wellness and health before anything else.

    Report Abuse
  • sce's Avatar
    Posted by sce Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:17pm PDT

    Biased selection of references by cochrane. Cherry picking.

    Report Abuse
  • coolschooldog's Avatar
    Posted by coolschooldog Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:17pm PDT

    So what are the risks of taking vitamins?

    aren't they helpful........

    Report Abuse
  • Bryan S's Avatar
    Posted by Bryan S Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:18pm PDT

    Do you get paid by "Juice Plus" or any other supplement maker? If so, you should disclose. We wouldn't want a conflict of interest in the medical field, would we?

    Report Abuse
  • gwon392's Avatar
    Posted by gwon392 Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:18pm PDT

    What's the research? Can you give me a link or direct quotes? Anyone can say anything without providing a reliable source.

    "Talk to a doctor" is a problem already. Many doctors don't know about nutrition as they only take few classes in schools. If I can't avoid any risk at all, I will choose supplements over drugs created by pharmaceutical companies.

    Report Abuse
  • Beach Buzz's Avatar
    Posted by Beach Buzz Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:19pm PDT

    Wow!!! I wonder if I can get some of that Arctic Zero here in Arizona? Why does California get all the good stuff? I can eat the whole pint at 128 calories and still eat another one.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 212

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Updates Chatter on Shine...

Health Byte

A survey of 4,000 women revealed that 6 out of 10 of us have disordered eating habits. Are you one of them?