Healthy Living

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Hardly a healthy lunch: The sorry state of the school lunch program

The third School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study, which evaluates the school meal program, came out recently. The Journal of the American Dietetic Association devoted over 130 pages in a special supplement this month to its findings. There’s much to read and think about in its data.

I’d like to devote this post to just one topic covered by the study, and talk about what our kids get served, and what they actually eat while in the school cafeteria for lunch. I, for one, am quite concerened.

A short introduction to the school meal program:

In 1946 the National School Lunch Act created the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) with a dual purpose—to feed kids and prevent dietary deficiency and to provide an outlet for surplus agricultural commodities. The school lunch program operates in all public schools and in many private schools too.

The School Breakfast Program was established in 1975 to help meet the nutritional needs of children from low-income families and is offered in fewer schools.

On any average school day more than 30 million kids eat a school lunch, and 10 million kids eat a school breakfast. Fifty-nine percent of the kids eating a school lunch are from low-income homes, as are 80 percent of school breakfast eaters.

The USDA-sponsored third School Nutrition Dietary assessment study was based on a sample of almost 400 public schools that offer subsidized school meals, and about 2,300 students grades 1-12.

Here’s a picture of what’s offered for lunch:

Milk: Milk is offered in practically all schools. One percent fat milk was the most common milk served, and the majority of milk offered is flavored.

Fruit: Ninety-four percent of schools offered fruit or fruit juices. Only 50 percent of schools offered fresh fruit. The rest offered canned fruit or fruit juice.

Vegetables: This study considers starchy vegetables such as white potatoes a vegetable. By that classification, 96 percent of kids had a vegetable offering at lunch. But note that while 45 percent of high schools offered French fries (!) only 39 percent of schools offered lettuce salad, 29 percent offered orange or dark green vegetables, and 10 percent offered legumes.

Grains/bread: The vast majority of grain products (bread, rolls, bagels, crackers etc.) were made of refined white flour. Only 5 percent of grain offering was whole wheat.

Combination entrée: The most commonly offered combination entrée depended on age; in elementary school, 28 percent of combination entrees were peanut butter sandwiches, followed by meat sandwiches; in middle school the most commonly offered combination entree was pizza with meat, followed by cheeseburgers and sandwiches with breaded meat or poultry.

Dessert: Those were offered in 47 percent of high schools, 41 percent of middle schools and 37 percent of elementary school. The leading deserts were cookies, cakes and brownies.

This is what the kids actually ate for school lunch:

Milk: Seventy-five percent of kids drank milk, mostly 1 percent fat, and mostly flavored.

Fruit: Forty-five percent of kids ate some fruit; most of the fruit eaten was canned. Only 16 percent of kids overall had fresh fruit, and among high school kids it was only 8 percent.

Vegetables: Fifty-one percent of kids overall had some kind of vegetable, but that includes French fries. Lettuce salads were eaten by 6 percent of kids, orange or dark green vegetables were eaten by 6 percent, and legumes by 2 percent. French fries were eaten by 34 percent of high school kids!

Grains/bread: Thirty-four percent of kids had grain products. Only 1 percent of grain products eaten were whole wheat.

Combination entrée: 75 percent of kids selected these entrees, the most popular of which were pizza, sandwiches with breaded meat, fish or poultry, hamburgers or hot dogs.

Dessert: Thirty-eight percent of kids had dessert, mostly consisting of cookies cake and brownies or candy.

In assessing the quality of the school meals and the school food environment, the study authors and commentators compare the school food to the recommendations set by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. By these standards:

• The school lunch menu meets the standards for key nutrients such as protein, vitamins and minerals.

• The majority of lunches exceeded the recommendations for total fat (in over 80 percent of schools) and saturated fat (in 72 percent of schools). (The standards require fewer than 30 percent of calories come from fat, and less than 10 percent of fat be saturated fat.)

Only 6 percent of schools met the standards for all nutrients: fat, saturated fat, protein, vitamins A and C, iron and calcium.

• Very few schools offered lunch that was adequate in fiber.

• Practically all school lunches contained too much salt.


I offer you a very different way to look at the subsidized school lunch. You don’t need to be a nutritionist, you don’t needs charts and a calculator, and you don’t even need to know the Dietary Guidelines for Americans to assess the quality of the offerings we’re serving our next generation.

Picture the food described above and it’s easy recognize and name it: The school lunch is fast food! It’s salty, sweet and fatty, the meat is breaded and crunchy, it’s been highly processed—even the fruit and vegetables aren’t fresh for the most part.

Speaking of vegetables, I have nothing against potatoes; I think they’re nutritious and good to eat in many forms, but French fries aren’t a vegetable by any stretch of the imagination! (And neither is ketchup.)

Most of school lunches are not prepared in the school kitchen—the surplus commodities our food industry produces make their way to our schools as processed food and not as fresh fruits, vegetables and whole grains.

For those who say that a better school menu would be too expensive, I want you to consider that treating a whole host of chronic diseases, ranging from diabetes to heart disease to cancer—which are the dangerous result of the childhood obesity epidemic and the current lack of healthy nutrition—will cost so much more. Forty percent of the public school kids in this study were overweight! We definitely can’t afford that!

There are a few schools that serve healthy, nutritious food, made from real ingredients. There are a few schools that teach kids how to cook healthy meals and even grow their own vegetables.

But what most kids learn from the institution that’s supposed to prepare them for life are really bad eating habits that will set them up for a lifetime of struggle with weight. Even worse is that kids from low income homes—who have less access to wholesome food out of school—get this low quality food at school for lunch and breakfast.

What do your kids eat for lunch at school?

Dr. Ayala

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 45
  • aaru's Avatar
    Posted by aaru Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:54am PST

    good article! schools have started adding fruits and more veggies but THEY HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT KIDS EAT THEM. All I ever hear is how fruits always end up in the garbage in schools. decorate fruits, make veggie and fruit dishes look APPEALING only then kids will eat them.

    Report Abuse
  • 's Avatar
    Posted by Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:47am PST

    To be the honest,it is proved to be of great dufficult for schools to follow the real nutrition menu.personaly,I think it is largely depend on these pupil's parents.

    Moreover,there are rarely people focus on the food eating basing a study or an article like this

    Report Abuse
  • Rose's Avatar
    Posted by Rose Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:45am PST

    I do agree that the cafeteria is NOT the healthiest meal so we let them eat on perogie day and pizza Fridays but skip out on most meals offered by the school. We do get the milk everyday. On most days we give them a bagged lunch when the meal looks too much like fast food.

    Report Abuse
  • Sunflower's Avatar
    Posted by Sunflower Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:01am PST

    I was raised in Leesville, Louisiana. In ninth grade I moved to Dawson, Texas. My mother was a Louisiana school food manager for nine years, working in the school food service system for fourteen years altogether.

    The leesville schools offered fresh fruit every morning, oatmeal w/ one packet sugar and slice butter or cold cereal, white milk 1% or chocolate 1% (less common), orange or apple juice and a slice of toast. Other mornings we were offered homemade cinnamon rolls or oatmeal, and fruit w/ the same condiments and drinks. We were offered homemade rolls, meat loafs, gravies, gumbos, soups, deserts and a full salad bar w/ homemade buttermilk ranch and dressings.

    Everything was made from scratch for the most part (excluding veggies from cans.)

    The Dawson schools offer prepackaged pizza one time a week w/ french fries, two fake fried chicken strips one time a week, thee breaded beef strips one time a week, and nasty tomato soup that looked orange w/ grease looking coloration on top, and cheese sandwiches one time a week. All breakfast was prepackaged, and heated up. This is Jr. high/ high school mind you- the elementary is offered bananas, apple slice, oatmeal's, cereals, and eggs. We were always short on food and some kids had to wait twenty minutes for sandwiches and chips to be handed out because of under preparation. Nothing was homemade, everything was prepackaged. Majority of kids bought chips, and sodas because the food was so horribly flavored from packaging. (While I attended these schools)

    Leesville school lunch menu February 09 follow this link-

    http://www.vpsb.k12.la.us/education/sctemp/9947f48747e95127829259fd70b0d982/1234370907/February09Lunch_2.pdf

    Dawson school lunch menu February 09 follow this link-

    not offered online- most probably like my years in school.

    Leesville cafeteria managers were trained and attended school to be certified.

    Dawson allowed parents to apply or really anyone for that matter and trained by the last person who was hired and leaving.

    How is this difference fair for any child attending Dawson?

    Report Abuse
  • Jezabel's Avatar
    Posted by Jezabel Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:14am PST

    Although I eat very healthy (I had a salad almost everyday with my lunch back in HS) I really could not stand plain milk when I was a kid and chose chocolate milk. Unfortuantly alot of eating choices made by students stems from home. If kids are eating a proper meal everyday then it would be relfected in the cafeteria, unfortuantly those are not the ones we need to worry about.

    Report Abuse
  • Caitie's Avatar
    Posted by Caitie Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:20am PST

    I remember in grade school was rice covered in gravy was a balanced meal. I am now 20.

    Report Abuse
  • mommaofsun's Avatar
    Posted by mommaofsun Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:27am PST

    Yesterday, my kids had goulash, cabbage, cranberries, and mixed veggies. This morning, both of my sons demanded I pack them a decent lunch. LOL!!! Some of the lunches don't sound to bad, but yesterday just sounded like punishment. My 14 yr old can take a microwaveable meal to school, but the 6 yr old has to settle for a cold lunch. Anyhoo, I know several times I have gone to the school to pick my youngest up early, the smell makes me want to vomit. some things never change, I guess.

    Report Abuse
  • 's Avatar
    Posted by Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:43am PST

    There are three major problems with the National School Lunch Program. The first is that schools are only reimbursed for full meals that are taken by eligible students. This translates to the schools having to give the students what they want, and pandering to their palates with sweet, salty, fat laden fare specifically engineered by industrial food manufacturers to meet the federal guidelines. The second problem is the decaying infrastructure in our school kitchens and the rampant fear of food-borne illness and concern for food safety is forcing many districts to move away from scratch cooking to a heat-and-serve methodology. Finally, the federal guidelines only require meals to "hit the mark" on certain nutrient levels, regardless of how it gets there. This leads to foods injected with soy fillers to increase protein levels, enriched with vitamins not native to the ingredients, and loaded with artificial flavor enhancers and preservatives to increase shelf life.

    In all fairness to school districts around the country, better food IS more expensive, and they simply don't have adequate funding. I run Children's Choice, a company in the San Francisco Bay Area that provides healthy, sustainable school lunches, and I can tell you firsthand...it's more expensive to do it right. But it takes more than money. Our program is predicated on the parent preordering the entree from our website, www.ChoiceLunch.com, and empowering the child to choose from a variety of healthy snacks, fresh fruits and vegetables, and a beverage. But it requires more than just reading ingredient labels and putting the right options in front of the children. The children have to be educated on why it's important to make good food choices, and how to make those choices. And that education starts in the home. Many of the children getting NSLP lunches are not from homes where these choices are re-enforced outside of school, and their expectation of what food is and what it should taste like carries over into the lunch room.

    If we really want to change the state of school lunch, we need to change the way American's think about and relate to food. We need to stop subsidizing the crops that provide the cheap calories that now find their way into nearly every product on supermarket shelves and propagate the nutrient void diet that has gripped our children. We need to support local farmers and encourage children to eat "real" fruits and vegetables, and teach them not only where they come from, but when they're in season. And, quite frankly, we just need to cook more. Move away from frozen convenience foods and towards the forgotten joys of the home-cooked meal. We need to instill these values in our children while continuing to push for school food reform, or changes made in the schools alone will meet with a resistance to severe to truly take hold.

    Report Abuse
  • carolk's Avatar
    Posted by carolk Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:35pm PST

    I recently looked at bringing my preschooler on post for childcare. I asked if I could provide my child with meals because of her food allergies. I was told that most kids aren't allowed to bring their lunch and the childcare would provide it but was assured that they were given healthy food because it's USDA mandated that they do so. I looked at their food board and saw that the kids were being given Poptarts and milk as a snack! What's worse is that when I asked the lady about it, she said that it's considered a fruit!!! What's REALLY going on?

    Report Abuse
  • TBeck's Avatar
    Posted by TBeck Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:24pm PST

    We don't bother with the school program anymore. On Pizza day my son came home and got sick almost everytime. I usually pack his lunch now. At least then I know what he is getting. My son's school district offers a salad bar that does have actual fresh fruit and vegetable(apples, carrot sticks etc..)but if the kids don't learn at home to eat healthy, they won't do it at school.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 45

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Health Byte

Are your feet aching? Do you suffer from plantar fasciitis or varicose veins? Relief could be as simple as stretching your toes.