Healthy Living

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Healthy food on a tight budget: Most economical protein

As the economy continues to be somewhat unpredictable, you are probably looking for ways to cut back spending in a lot of areas...food being one of them.  If you do your research, it is possible to still eat healthy and not spend a fortune.  It means understanding what things cost per serving, and what nutritional values are provided in each serving.

As a result, we are kicking off a series of articles that takes a look at different foods and compares them serving for serving, as to what provides the best value: quality, healthy food for the best price.  This will help you understand how to potentially maximize your budget around food shopping, while insuring you get the nutrients your body needs and SO deserves.  Our first healthy food on a budget is protein.  We look at the serving size, and the calories, grams of fat, grams of protein and the cost for both a regular and an organic product per serving.

Quick Facts on Protein: First, let's understand the basics of protein and why you need them in your diet:

  • Protein comes from animals and plants and provides us with everything we need to build and maintain our muscles.
  • Protein is found in fish, meat, poultry, dairy, eggs and tofu, as well as beans, vegetables and fruit.
  • The leaner the protein is, the healthier it is for your diet.
  • Complete proteins provide you with ALL the necessary amino acids your body requires.
  • Incomplete proteins, however, are not sufficient protein sources by themselves. As a result, you need to eat several incomplete proteins to get all of the amino acids your body needs.

 

To ensure we are comparing apples to apples, so to speak, we are going to focus on complete proteins. The chart below does not include all foods that contain complete proteins, but it provides a good cross-section of popular foods. (All data is taken from Peapod, an online grocery shopping site.)

To really understand what is the best option, you need to factor in the quality of the food AND the cost.  If the food is high in fat it isn't such a bargain.  For instance, chicken drumsticks, whole eggs, peanut butter and low fat milk look to be the best cost options at $0.50 or less per serving.  However, chicken drumsticks, whole eggs and peanut butter are high in fat.  Further, if a food is low in protein (peanut butter and Tofu), you might not be getting as much 'protein bang' for your buck.

The best quality proteins on the list (low fat, high protein foods) are canned tuna, skinless chicken breast and whey protein with milk.  The best protein type in terms of value (lower fat, high protein and lower cost) would be your dairy products, especially egg-whites and low-fat milk.  Within the meat/poultry/fish food category, skinless chicken breast is your best option.  In general, red meats tend to be the worst choice, as they are both higher in fat and higher in cost.

Have you found a high quality, low costing protein that you enjoy?

Related Topics:

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 14
  • Jezabel's Avatar
    Posted by Jezabel Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:20am PDT

    I have recently started to look into fats rendered off from cooking as a cost saver in the kitchen as it was the most popular fat for cooking prior to the 20th century (schmaltz is associated with Eastern European Jewish cooking). I have started to braise chicken and meats in their own fat rather than add fat from another source (olive oil) which certainly improved the flavor of the dish but also contributes to the calorie intake. However I also find the fattier the food is (homemade) the less I will consume as I feel fuller faster than with a leaner cut of meat. I was wondering if using this old fashioned method would be a good recommendation for people trying to save money and perhaps consume healthier side dishes such as steamed vegetables and salad with no creamy dressing as the meat part of the meal rich enough. I am also assuming the amount of the protein served is about the size of one's palm of the hand.

    Report Abuse
  • Brett Blumenthal - Sheer Balance's Avatar
    Posted by Brett Blumenthal - Sheer Balance Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:54am PDT

    Jezabel: You are correct. The serving is meant to be about a deck of cards...which is similar to the palm. Basically, it is what is considered to be 'a serving'. I think cooking in the fat of the meat is definitely a cheaper way to go. First of all, the fattier cuts of meat are cheaper, and yes, you are using 'included fats' which don't cost extra. That said, fat from meat (any animal/bird, etc.) is very unhealthy for you as compared to vegetable fats. So, although you are saving money, I'm not 100% sure you are getting a healthier option. I'm a stickler for Olive Oil, Canola Oil and Sunflower Oil. All of them have healthier fats. Here is a comparison of fats: http://www.sheerbalance.com/fat.html

    Report Abuse
  • Jezabel's Avatar
    Posted by Jezabel Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:46am PDT

    Thanks for the link.

    And one more question. When I make homemade soups such and goulash or chicken soup I chill them overnight to skim off the fat. I was wondering how effective this method (slow brasing then cooking in water) is to render the fattier meats and poultry healthier. I know to some extent fat remains but is the cooked meat at a healthier state by removing the fat to the point its closer to its leaner counter parts. I usually make a vegetable based broth so fat is only added by meat.

    Report Abuse
  • Brett Blumenthal - Sheer Balance's Avatar
    Posted by Brett Blumenthal - Sheer Balance Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:03am PDT

    I don't know exact quantities of end results on this. However, cooking them in water is definitely better than cooking them in fat. Further, skimming the fat off means eliminating the fat when reheated. So yes, overall sounds like a healthier option. That said, if the cut of meat or poultry is high in fat, it will not be healthy just because of cooking it in water. ALL fat doesn't get extracted. So, if you start with a leaner cut, you will end with a leaner cut, regardless of how you cook it. Hope this helps.

    Report Abuse
  • Garrison's Avatar
    Posted by Garrison Mon Oct 27, 2008 7:52am PDT

    Need to address "incomplete" proteins, such as lentils and other legumes, as they are easily completed by serving them with rice (especially brown rice). On your table, lentils would top the list in low cost, low fat, high protein food.

    Just boil 1 cup lentils and 1 cup rice in 4-1/2 cups water along with a bay leaf and a buillion cube for 20 minutes. Serve with shredded or crumbled cheese. Should serve six. All the skinny people in the Middle East and Asia can't be wrong.

    Report Abuse
  • Isky's Avatar
    Posted by Isky Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:22am PDT

    I was wondering whether the type of animal fat makes a difference. Nutritionists claim that Omega-3 fats are the fats to eat. So, why isn't salmon included in your "healthiest" list? Chicken breast meat has no Omega-3 fat, right?

    Report Abuse
  • Brett Blumenthal - Sheer Balance's Avatar
    Posted by Brett Blumenthal - Sheer Balance Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:43am PDT

    lsky, you are right...Salmon is health and the Omega 3s are beneficial. That said, the article is focusing on the VALUE of the food, meaning how much it costs for the quality. That is why Salmon is not mentioned as one of the best options...it is the 2nd most expensive protein behind Beef.

    louwebguy...you are correct about your statement. However, once again, the article is focusing on COMPLETE proteins so that people have an apple to apple comparison. This is the first in a series, and we will cover more food types/categories in the future! Thanks!

    Report Abuse
  • Babbalou's Avatar
    Posted by Babbalou Mon Oct 27, 2008 12:27pm PDT

    I buy the least expensive frozen white fish (usually Pollack) which generally costs $4/lb. and use it to make Thai fish cakes - mixed in the food processor with red curry and other ingredients, formed into little cakes and sauteed in oil, they are delicious! The food processor eliminates the textural challenges of inexpensive frozen fish. I serve them with a vinegary dipping sauce - good enough for a dinner party and sooo cheap. Recipes are on the web or in many cookbooks (check your library).

    Report Abuse
  • abiba's Avatar
    Posted by abiba Tue Oct 28, 2008 6:55am PDT

    I think eating fish and chicken is the pest. Because they have low fat and high protein.

    Report Abuse
  • SilverFlower123's Avatar
    Posted by SilverFlower123 Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:29pm PDT

    One of my favorites is turkey ground meat, I mix that with vegetables and use steamed rice.

    Of course I'm speaking as a "healthy food option" not too expensive.

    I can use that in tostadas, with beans.

    Of course like I read up above and agree with the ladies, it is a deck size card.

    I like to use the kids plates with the divided section, so that helps me a bit to curb my "servings".

    Great article!!

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 14

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Updates Chatter on Shine…

Health Byte

You know you need to hydrate. But is the water you're drinking safe? Here are 7 ways to be sure your water's fit for you.