Healthy Living

Sunday, November 29, 2009

I have to wait HOW LONG to schedule my mammogram?

Today, I am having my first mammogram. Although I write about a lot of personal things, I didn't really intend to tell all of the interwebs that I am about to have some really high-tech, expensive portraits of my breasts taken this afternoon. The thing is, I am feeling really lucky that I got the appointment at all.

I have great doctors, great insurance coverage, and go to one of the most highly regarded hospitals in the country. I am pretty privileged when it comes to medical care and since I've had periods of time in my adult life when I've been uninsured, broke, and under the care of a doctor I didn't trust, I do not take that for granted. Still, I came pretty close to waiting almost a year to be able to get a mammogram I really need to have right away.

That's right, a year.

My doctor gave me a list of three recommended mammogram screening centers. One is a private office where my insurance is not accepted and where I am invited to pay full price out of pocket (and would probably be paying out of my pockets for the next few years).

With that option scratched from the list, I called the second recommendation on the list. It is considered the breast health center in my city. An automated message blared through the phone telling me, "Due to a nationwide shortage of radiologists, we have an unusually long wait time for scheduling mammograms."

I prepared myself. My doctor warned me it might take a few months for me to get an appointment. What I wasn't ready for was the first available date the scheduler read off to me. She would be happy to put me down for the last week of January of 2010.

I declined the appointment time offered a year out, hung up, and dialed the third place on my list. I'd never heard of it, don't think it is affiliated with my hospital, and was more concerned about their wait time than their reputation, location, or any of those other logistical issues.

I easily got an appointment in a time slot less than 24 hours from when I called. I feel like I lucked out. And isn't that crazy? Isn't it odd that I should feel so fortunate to have a routine - and critical - exam within a year from the day my doctor tells me I should have it, and probably pretty soon?

This is not just an issue in my city. This is also an issue in San Francisco, where this piece that just ran in last Sunday's Chronicle says the shortage of radiologists is having a dire impact on the screening and treatment of women in need in California. A state-of-the-art breast center built with the intention of serving low-income women can now only serve half the patients it did when it opened five years ago. Back then, a woman could schedule a mammogram within a few weeks. Today, a lack of professionals legally qualified to read the scans has put the center and it's patients in crisis. It now takes 300 days for women to schedule a precautionary mammogram. What's even worse is that it takes 128 days for women who've felt a lump in their breast to be screened.

Those women, the ones who've felt a lump, are bumped up in priority for appointments. However, an aggressive tumor could grow enough to sharply impact the woman's chances of survival, according to Susan Brown, the director of health education for Susan G. Koman for the Cure. Isn't that terrifying?

Other facilities in California, just as I experienced in my city, can see women within a few days. However, it seems critical to understand how the shortage of radiologists has led to these ridiculous and threatening scheduling lags.

One reason, the article reports, is that radiologists are not compensated as well as other doctors, and that there is an increasing risk of being sued by patients who say breast cancer was not detected by the person who read their mammogram.

Whatever the causes, the trickle down effect for women - particularly for women who have few resources, little or no insurance coverage, not as many places to get a mammogram where they live, or any of the many obstacles to getting medical attention - is so frightening. This could be life or death for a woman. And that woman could be one of us.

I am going to go to my appointment today, breathe deeply, and pray that my breasts are healthy. And then I am going to have a moment of gratitude that someone in the office where I stand in a dingy green, open gown is there to read my results. When I do, I will hope that each of you can get a mammogram when you need one, too.

What's going on with getting a mammogram where you live? Have you had to wait a long time to schedule your scan?


Read more:

[photo credit: Getty Images]
Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-9 of 9
  • ThirdCoast's Avatar
    Posted by ThirdCoast Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:23pm PST

    My community has an abundance of state-of-the-art radiology clinics and I've never had to wait longer than I wanted to. I usually get an appointment the same week and can even get a Saturday appointment. After reading your story, I feel blessed.

    Report Abuse
  • Mary AnneB's Avatar
    Posted by Mary AnneB Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:37am PST

    I am a Mammogram tech and the pressure on us to be at 100% every minute of our day is tremendous. The same for the radiologist. Each patient comes in with different needs and we must assess those needs and be that tech for that patient. You have put your breast health and your life in my hands. This is a very emotional study for the patient and the tech and I am blessed and honored to be part of the team in this battle against breast cancer.

    Report Abuse
  • Jessica Ashley, Shine staff's Avatar
    Posted by Jessica Ashley, Shine staff Sat Feb 21, 2009 4:37pm PST

    Madabucco, thank you so much for sharing your perspective on this. I greatly respect what you and your colleagues do, and as a patient I hope more radiologists and techs join the profession...and soon!

    Report Abuse
  • senjythompson's Avatar
    Posted by senjythompson Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:39pm PST

    DON'T miss a mammogram, even if you have to pay out of pocket -- the average cost, nationally, is $100-$250. Borrow from a friend or family member, but DON'T miss one, especially if you feel a lump. I am now in the ninth month of treatment for early stage breast cancer, which has included mastectomy and four months of chemotherapy. If I had waited, this might have been deadly. Isn't your life worth more than $100?

    By the way, the radiologists and techs at our breast care center are AWESOME! You are amazing -- I'm so grateful for what you do and for working so hard.

    Report Abuse
  • angie247's Avatar
    Posted by angie247 Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:24pm PST

    Fortunately I live in a large metropolitan city and have my mammograms performed at a large well known cancer treatment center. I've never had to wait more than a week or two for a routine mammogram, although I always call at least a month before my annual exam.

    For worrisome lumps, I would ask your doctor for an ultrasound if a mammogram appointment is too far away. Ultrasounds can pick up cancers that mammograms sometimes miss and are usually easier to get. You couldn't do this for routine screenings, but you certainly could get one if a lump was felt. But you have to ask - your doctor might not even think of it.

    Report Abuse
  • PJ's Avatar
    Posted by PJ Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:15am PST

    My techs have always been thoughtful and supportive and I appreciate that as I am one of those people for whom mammograms are very painful. I don't think I generally have a low pain threshold, but a mammogram means a stifled scream for me. My techs have joked, comforted, and been great. Now that people are out of work it seems very odd that techs and radiologists are in such short supply. We need to be training people for the areas of need.

    Report Abuse
  • Suzanne's Avatar
    Posted by Suzanne Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:10am PST

    Imagine if our health care system becomes nationalized...it will me much worse!

    Report Abuse
  • MrktManager08's Avatar
    Posted by MrktManager08 Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:28pm PST

    I recently left a position as a manager at an outpatien imaging center. We did not do mammography for many reasons but mainly for two reasons: we couldn't afford the radiologist and the reimbursement for mammography is very low. The average cost for performing a mammogram is about $85 per mammogram and the average reimbursement is around $81! Clearly, over the course of a year and 10s of thousands of mammograms, that's a huge loss. This is a supply and demand issue. There is huge demand but a fellowship trained radiologist in mammography can cost more than half a million a year (their costs are high due to very very high malpractice rates and stringent schooling and certification requirements)! Until the government ups their reimbursement (medicare and medicaid) for this exam, the situation will continue to worsen since all commercial insurance companies try to remain within the medicare reimbursement range. Do some research on reimbursement and costs in your state and write your senator to demand action before we all suffer the consequences!

    Report Abuse
  • mrsc's Avatar
    Posted by mrsc Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:37am PST

    I live in a rural/small town area in central Texas. At a Monday doctor appointment I mentioned it was time for my next mammogram and he had it scheduled for the following Wednesday. I was pretty pleased with that.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-9 of 9

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Updates Chatter on Shine…

Health Byte

Who doesn't want to look hot at all those holiday parties? ExerciseTV shares how to get in skinny jeans-shape -- and quickly!