Healthy Living

Friday, December 4, 2009

Is a parent responsible for their child's body size?

When I read the story all over the news today about the mother arrested and being charged with criminal neglect because her 14-year old son weighs 555 pounds, my heart sank. But I didn't know what to say or even think about the whole situation.

My heart sank because there is boy who is barely in high school who is living in a body that must be pushed to its limits. Being a teenager is hard enough, and I cannot imagine how physically and emotionally difficult it must be for this kid, who surely cannot participate in many of the activities and opportunities that get teens through those tough years.

His mother, Jerri Gray, says that she did not keep sweets or soda in the house, but admits she left her son home alone often while she worked second-shift or third-shift jobs. She also said she had to bring home fast food for dinner because of her demanding work schedule.

Attorneys for the family said that she did take as many opportunities as she could to treat her son's obesity. However, South Carolina's State Department of Social Services pursued custody the boy in foster care after health care providers reported that his mother was not meeting his medical needs. The agency found the boy to be at high risk and placed him in foster care.

The situation was already quite complicated. Under fire in May, Gray fled the state with her son. Once found in Maryland, her son was examined by paramedics and turned over to the state's Department of Human Resources while Gray was arrested for violation of a custody order.

Although it is reported that Gray did follow the department's guidelines, it is presumed that the 14-year old eating more than the food she provided for him. Lt. Shea Smith countered that, saying that Gray did not take advantage of all opportunities for her son's medical care.

Similar cases have been considered in five other states. Family attorneys expressed concern on CNN that this case would open the door for parents to be held legally responsible if their children are eating disordered or even if they become pregnant.

I will be watching with interest to see what happens in this case and what kind of precedent it may set for parents of obese -- or starving or pregnant, as the lawyers projected -- children. I believe parents are the biggest role models for health and wellness for their children and thereby need to be the most accountable. I'd love to hear this mom say that maybe she didn't teach him well enough, didn't provide enough healthy foods for her growing son to thrive. However, I wonder if she, like many parents, was so mired in her responsibilities and work schedule that she just couldn't. I wonder if she just doesn't know what to do or how to take on her son's critical needs.

But should she serve time for that? Should she lose custody of her son? I can't say. I don't even know where to stand on the issue. It all seems like too much. It all seems overdone when it could be an opportunity for someone to step in and get this family on an intense program and maybe turn this all around.

Still, my heart sinks for the kid who was already home a lot, who already has a lot to deal with, and now featured all over the Internet and news and may be separated from his mother. Childhood obesity is awful and heart-breaking, yes. But is it criminal?

Most importantly, is he getting the emotional care, counseling, and medical attention social services says he needs while he is in foster care? I'd like to know that.

I'd also like to know the true health status of this 14-year old kid. Does he have any medical complications? How is his blood pressure? Is he sleeping well? Is he active? Is he happy? We can place a lot of assumptions on him by his weight, but I do think there is more here to be considered. 

Until then, all we as readers know is that a child is obese and his parent is being charged with unlawful neglect for it. As this case continues to unfold and as this child is in the care of another family, perhaps we need to take the situation personally. Perhaps we need to turn our attention away from the photos of this boy to consider the question seeded by the attorneys. If we are parents, perhaps this is a chance to be self-reflective, and if we are not, perhaps it is a chance to think about how we were raised by asking:

Should a parent be held responsible for their child's body size?
Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 211
  • Mrs. P's Avatar
    Posted by Mrs. P Mon Jul 27, 2009 1:23pm PDT

    Yes, a parent should be responsible for their child's body size.

    If the child is living under YOUR roof and YOU, as a PARENT are providing the food, then you are responsible for everything the child eats. There is no excuse for a child to be this big! The parent should have done something when the child got a few pounds overweight. Also, a child this age should be more active than this...it is really both of their faults, but more so the parent.

    Report Abuse
  • crazysmom's Avatar
    Posted by crazysmom Mon Jul 27, 2009 1:37pm PDT

    just pray you don't have an overweight kid you do the best you can but it is not always good enough I know I was that kid! It was not my moms fault...

    Report Abuse
  • Ahleah G's Avatar
    Posted by Ahleah G Mon Jul 27, 2009 1:41pm PDT

    I also agree that a parent should be held responsible for their child's body size. If your child is severely overweight, you need to demonstrate that you are making an effort to help him/her lose the weight and eat properly. Effort being defined as proper medical care, keeping a food log, providing healthy food not only fast food. It works the same for children with eating disorders, they need to be receiving medical care and the parents need to demonstrate an attempt to help them with the problem. That being said, parents do not have absolute control of their children. They can be good parents who monitor their kids and still have an overweight child or a child with anorexia. The law needs to be very careful not to punish a parent who is trying their best. I'm not sure whether or not that is the case here or whether this child was being monitored by a doctor.

    As to the author's concern that parents could be punished if their child gets pregnant, well that just doesn't seem reasonable. As I said parents don't have absolute control. It takes just one time of a child sneaking out or going somewhere other than where they say for an accidental pregnancy to occur. It is not indicative of repeated failure to supervise them (they may have even been caught or punished). The distinction is that severe obesity occurs over a period of time, whereas pregnancy happens and only takes one slip up for it to occur.

    Report Abuse
  • Laura's Avatar
    Posted by Laura Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:36pm PDT

    I am curious as to what will happen if this goes forward and we wind up with a case about an overweight kid and it turns out to be something else (thyroid, etc.).

    I am also curious as to how many parents without health care are supposed to be able to afford the medical support it would entail.

    Something does need to be done, no question. I'm not sure how criminalizing the parenting of an overweight child is going to help prevent childhood obesity. It would help if as a society we were more concerned with helping and a LOT less concerned with blaming.

    Report Abuse
  • KoriLynne's Avatar
    Posted by KoriLynne Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:40pm PDT

    oh heck yes you are fully responsible for your child's size! Just like you are responsible for their clothing, roof over their heads, education and life's lessons, why would you not be responsible for the food you put in your child's mouth? If you can be charged and convicted of neglect and not feeding your child, wouldn't it make sense to be the other way around? Too much? That is a form of neglect to you know! Giving your child an overabundance of snacks just to quiet them instead of engaging them is common and just as wrong! I live in Corpus Christi, Tx and I see this every where I go. People are too big and their kids as well...too much eating is just as harmful as not eating enough. Yes, we are very much responsible for our kids size.

    Report Abuse
  • k. p's Avatar
    Posted by k. p Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:00pm PDT

    yes it is the parents responsibilty because they ( the parents ) NEED TO LEAD BY EXAMPLE AND ALSO THEY NEED TO STEP UP AND MONTIOR THE CHILDS FOOD INTAKE AS WELL AND ALSO THEY NEED TO GET THE KID OFF THE SOFA And GET OUT THERE AND MOVE AND FOR ONCE BY SOME HEALTHY FOOD AND MONTIOR THE WEIGHT LOSS AND WHAT THE CHILD DOES AFTER SCHOOL. i FEEL THAT THE MOM NEEDS MAJOR HELP And needs to GROW UP AND STOP AVOIDING HER KID

    Report Abuse
  • Mysterious Gryphon's Avatar
    Posted by Mysterious Gryphon Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:42pm PDT

    I'm sorry, but her work schedule kept her from throwing together a salad?

    How much can two people cost that this woman needs three jobs to keep a roof over their heads - oh yeah, the kid was eating enough for three.

    This is what happens when we try to raise children as single parents. Where is this boy's father? Why is he not playing football in the backyard with his dad? Why isn't this man holding down a job and protecting his family?

    And don't tell me that single parenthood "just happens." We choose to have sex before marriage and get pregnant with people we can't trust, and we choose to get divorces rather than just work it out. There are THREE people to blame for this kid's ill health.

    Report Abuse
  • Libby's Avatar
    Posted by Libby Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:44pm PDT

    The issue here is that this kid is not just 20 or 30 lbs overweight. He weighs 555 lbs!At 14 years old! That kind of extreme weight gain doesn't happen in a matter of months. We are taking about long term negligence on the part of this mother! She continuously took the easy way by providing fast food rather than nutritious meals, and by providing that, obviously, the kid surmised that it was ok to eat that crap on a daily basis. Then, when Mom isn't around (even though "soda and sweets" weren't provided in the home) the kid managed to get his hands on it anyway. The kid is a victim of abuse here! Just not the type we are used to seeing. Weight issues as severe as this cause serious health problems, and develop bad habits. YES, SHE IS GUILTY OF CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE OF A CHILD IN MY BOOK!

    Report Abuse
  • Robyn's Avatar
    Posted by Robyn Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:11pm PDT

    "She also said she had to bring home fast food for dinner because of her demanding work schedule." Bull s--- i had a full time job and full time school i found the steam fresh veggies and pasta meals in the freezer aisle those only take 10 minutes to cook if that. fast food is just being lazy.

    on another note yes ill agree that parents are responsible to an extent. if you feed your children non healthy foods and do out kick them out of the house to play then yes thats NOT OK. pregnant??? my mom had 80 hour work weeks there is no way in hell she could have everything that i did.... but that were you differentiate parents that are by defualt negligent or those who chose to be

    Report Abuse
  • SoxFan's Avatar
    Posted by SoxFan Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:18pm PDT

    Who are we all to judge? We don't know we were not living in her house with them. She was working and doing her best. How about let's try to think about that. Aren't we all doing the best that we can?

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 211

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Health Byte

Tune in to our fitness forecast! These are the top ten exercise trends for 2010.