Healthy Living

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Is high-fructose corn syrup really worse than sugar?

Is sugar just sugar, even if it's high-fructose corn syrup? I thought the answer was no, that high-fructose corn syrup is worse than regular sugar or honey or even plain corn syrup and I should avoid it. And let's not even get into sugar substitutes.

But last night I was watching TV and saw a commercial from the Corn Refiners Association saying that high-fructose corn syrup is no worse for me than regular sugar. (See the commercials for yourself at www.sweetsurprise.com.) Could it be true?

I asked one of EatingWell's nutrition experts to help me sort out fact from hype. We recently wrote about high-fructose corn syrup, and it generated an overwhelming, and impassioned, response from our readers.

Author Joyce Hendley's piece helped me get my facts right and hopefully will help you sort out fact from fiction. I've included the report here so you can see the facts for yourself:

• High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is a manmade sweetener that's found in a wide range of processed foods, from ketchup and cereals to crackers and salad dressings. It also sweetens just about all of the (regular) soda Americans drink. HFCS used in foods is between 50 to 55 percent fructose-so chemically, it's virtually identical to table sugar (sucrose), which is 50 percent fructose. Metabolic studies suggest our bodies break down and use HFCS and sucrose the same way.

• Yet, after HFCS began to be widely introduced into the food supply 30-odd years ago, obesity rates skyrocketed. And because the sweetener is so ubiquitous, many blame HFCS for playing a major role in our national obesity epidemic. As a result, some shoppers equate HFCS with "toxic waste" when they see it on a food label. But when it comes right down to it, a sugar is a sugar is a sugar. A can of soda contains around nine teaspoons of sugar in the form of HFCS-but, from a biochemical standpoint, drinking that soda is no worse for you than sipping home-brewed iced tea that you've doctored with nine teaspoons of table sugar.

• Even Barry Popkin, Ph.D., a nutrition professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who previously suggested, in an influential 2004 paper, a possible HFCS-obesity link, stresses that the real obesity problem doesn't lie just with HFCS. Rather, it's the fact that sugars from all sources have become so prevalent in our food supply, especially in our beverages. He scoffs at the "natural" sweeteners sometimes added to upscale processed foods like organic crackers and salad dressings. "They all have the same caloric effects as sugar," he explains. "I don't care whether something contains concentrated fruit juice, brown sugar, honey or HFCS. The only better sweetener option is 'none of the above.'"

At EatingWell, it's our philosophy to keep any sweeteners we use in our recipes to a minimum-and likewise, to limit processed foods with added sugars of any type, including HFCS. We recommend you do the same.

By Michelle Edelbaum

Michelle is the associate editor of interactive for EatingWell Media Group. In between editing and writing, she enjoys sampling the tasty results of the easy, healthy recipes that the EatingWell Test Kitchen cooks are working on.



Related Links from EatingWell:

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 71
  • DeAnn's Avatar
    Posted by DeAnn Thu Sep 11, 2008 3:02pm PDT

    The thing about HFCS is it bonds to the "sweet" receptors ten times stronger than sucrose, regular table sugar. I don't remember the actual table (I sold back almost all of my college textbooks - Biology is expensive!), but it's probably online somwhere. Fructose is the sweetest natural sugar out there.

    What happens with HFCS's is companies can buy them for relatively cheap and use LESS of it than acutal sugar to make things as sweet as they are. This was a revolution in the breakfast ceral industry, as the competition for sweet, sugary products heated up, this provided a way to keep costs down, keep the sweetness, and maximize profit.

    Well, we now regulate breakfast cereals because we realized they were downright bad for us. But the legacy continues. It's just smart business to use HFCS instead of sugars because you use less of it to make it much sweeter than you could otherwise.

    Now, the problem may be that this trigger works on the pleasure center in the brain and ultimately feeds an addiction to sweet. People really should avoid it like the plague and train their brains to taste natural sweet and less sweet tastes than the artificial sweeteners.

    By the by, did you know the stuff that makes aspertame sweeteners (NutraSweet, Equal, etc) is actually an amino acid? Yup, for some reason it binds to sugar receptors.

    Report Abuse
  • Alex's Avatar
    Posted by Alex Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:21pm PDT

    Yes, it is worse than sugar. And I don't agree that a sugar is a sugar. I don't know if it's the enzymatic process or what but it tastes different and it has gotten to the point where we are so used to the overtly sweet products that when we travel to other countries, we think it's not sweet enough!

    I don't know if you have ever had a coke product from Mexico. They use real sugar in their soft drinks and they are way tastier. The bad thing about hfcs is that it is in the most unimaginable places. Why would anyone put hfcs in bread? Really. This is just another way for these industries to lure us back so that they can continue to turn a profit while feeding us garbage.

    Report Abuse
  • mike d's Avatar
    Posted by mike d Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:22pm PDT

    Sooooooo, the moral of the story it...quit eating so much sugar.

    Report Abuse
  • Isky's Avatar
    Posted by Isky Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:57pm PDT

    I avoid HFCS because it's politically correct to do so. Yes, I know companies who use this sweetener claim that it's no different than sugar, but they are feeding us too much sweetness, and just for profit! Aside from my comments above, can anyone tell me why I find white corn at the supermarkets, but cannot find any fresh yellow corn? Is all the yellow corn being used to produce HFCS?

    Report Abuse
  • WilliamM's Avatar
    Posted by WilliamM Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:39am PDT

    And as if what DeAnn mentions isn't bad enough, salt gets added in quantity to just about everything containing HFCS, to neutralize some of the cloy. So now we also have high sodium content in processed foods, with sodium being a major contributor to hypertension...

    Report Abuse
  • Nini Poo's Avatar
    Posted by Nini Poo Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:56am PDT

    Those commercials are BS. They say that HFCS is fine in moderation and it's the same as sugar.... well if HFCS wasn't in EVERYTHING you can purchase at the grocery store maybe we COULD actually eat it in moderation. Go vegetarian!!! and get rid of the processed foods!! Read Skinny b---- , it will open your eyes!!

    Report Abuse
  • Rowdygirl's Avatar
    Posted by Rowdygirl Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:20am PDT

    The commercials are made from the viewpoint of the Corn Refiners Association, so it makes sense that they would promote this as a "healthy choice". I try to avoid HFCS whenever I can,(Splenda is my sweetner of choice) but it's increasing difficult since it seems to be in almost everything. It's even hard to find a whole grain loaf of bread without it.

    Report Abuse
  • Disgruntled's Avatar
    Posted by Disgruntled Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:14am PDT

    Very interesting article. I'd seen the ads and also heard my mother and sister preaching at me about the horrors of HFCS. I have been curious as to why HFCS is so bad.

    I really don't know much about the science of the whole thing but I'd think that the main reason obesity is skyrocketing in America has more to do with the fact that we eat more processed foods, more sweets and in larger portions than we used to. I remember when bottles of soda were 16 oz. and they were considered a lot of soda. Now they're 20 oz. and people treat them as a single serving. When I was a kid, soda was a rare treat. Now kids drink it every day. Yes, HFCS is part of the problem since it seems to be in everything, but I think our eating habits are the real issue.

    Report Abuse
  • badgerdog's Avatar
    Posted by badgerdog Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:04am PDT

    Ahh, DeAnn, you took the words right out of my mouth! My point on HFCS exactly. Also, as some other commenters pointed out, one of the main problems with this is that it is in EVERYTIHING. As an example, why should Lasagne have HFCS in it? Why should Breads, crackers, etc. etc. etc. The list is endless! Sugars used to be a "luxury" item, a treat, only trotted out on special occasions. Now we can't get away from it. If you could really just have it "in moderation" or as a "treat", it would probably be okay. However, it has permeated all our foods except whole, natural-state foods. We have become a society addicted to sugars and for what? There's no nutritional benefits, we are just addicted to the sweet taste. If you really want to do your body a favor, cut out all sugars.

    Report Abuse
  • badgerdog's Avatar
    Posted by badgerdog Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:16am PDT

    After going to the website and watching those commercials, I had to come back and make another comment. (Well, my first one hasn't even appeared yet, so maybe this will be my first comment, lol.)

    That website (www.sweetsurprise.com) disgusts me. It's sheer propaganda. They have the people saying "it's fine in moderation!" while offering fruit punch or a popcicle, but what they don't say it that it's also in the sandwich bread, the chips, the lunchmeat, the drinks and everything else at that little picnic and party!! What a disgusting snow job. Thanks, but no thanks. They are obviously banking on the public being "sheeple".

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 71

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Updates Chatter on Shine…

Health Byte

Who doesn't want to look hot at all those holiday parties? ExerciseTV shares how to get in skinny jeans-shape -- and quickly!