Healthy Living

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

SELF speaks out about Kelly Clarkson photo retouching

Sept09.SELF.cover.72dpi.jpg
DO WE RETOUCH? YES!

Last Friday, the Internet was abuzz with the fact that I answered the question, did you Photoshop the September issue cover photo of Kelly Clarkson? with the answer: Yes. Of course we do retouching (though it's technically not Photoshop, but that is semantics). We correct color and other aspects of the digital pictures we take and then publish the best version we can. Here is what I have to add to this conversation:

When I ran the marathon five years ago, I was so proud of myself for completing it in under five hours and not walking a single step. But my hips looked big in some of the photos (I was heavier then), so when I wanted to put one of them on the editor's letter in SELF, I asked the art department to shave off a little. I am confident in my body, proud of what it can accomplish, but it just didn't look the way I wanted in every picture.

This is still true even when I'm all dressed up at a party or wedding or other event—there are pictures where I think I was captured looking my best, and those when I look pretty awkward (midsentence or whatever). I only keep the pix where I look my best.

The same is true of vacation. I keep the pix that show us all happy and glowing and laughing and playing, not the ones where we are scowling or hungry or tired. The ones that make the Christmas card are the best of the best.

Find out what Ok! got wrong with it's Jessica Simpson cover.

THE COVER PORTRAIT

Pictures are meant to tell a story, express a feeling, convey an emotion or capture a moment. Portraits like the one we take each month for the cover of SELF are not supposed to be unedited or a true-to-life snapshot (more on that in a moment). When the cover girl arrives at the shoot, she is usually unmade up and casually dressed, and could be mistaken for a member of the crew or the editorial team in many cases. Once we do her makeup and hair, and dress her in beautifully styled outfits and then light her, we then set the best portrait photographer we can on a road to finding a pose and capturing a moment that shows her at her best. This usually involves music for her to relax to, props, painted backdrops or locations that create a natural context. Then the shoot starts and after about 100 images are snapped, there are outfit changes and more lighting adjustments, more hair touch-ups and fans blowing, etc. The scene is truly amazing to watch and there are often two dozen people on set.

Then we edit the film and choose the best pictures. This is done in tandem with the star; the creative director, Cindy Searight; the photographer; and myself. Then we allow the postproduction process to happen, where we mark up the photograph to correct any awkward wrinkles in the blouse, flyaway hair and other things that might detract from the beauty of the shot. This is art, creativity and collaboration. It's not, as in a news photograph, journalism. It is, however, meant to inspire women to want to be their best. That is the point.

See what Kelly actually looks like in the behind the scenes cover shoot video!

KELLY'S CONTAGIOUS CONFIDENCE

Kelly has this amazing spirit, the kind of joie de vivre that certain people possess that makes you want to stand closer to them, hoping that you can learn what they know. In this case, you get the feeling Kelly has not let fame spoil her, but also that she was just born confident, with a generosity of spirit that is all about others and rarely about herself. She is, like her music, giving and strong and confident and full of gusto. Did we alter her appearance? Only to make her look her personal best. Did we publish an act of fiction? No. Not unless you think all photos are that. But in the sense that Kelly is the picture of confidence, and she truly is, then I think this photo is the truest we have ever put out there on the newsstand. I love her spirit and her music and her personality that comes through in our interview in SELF. She is happy in her own skin, and she is confident in her music, her writing, her singing, her performing. That is what we all relate to. Whether she is up or down in pounds is irrelevant (and to set the record straight, she works out and does boot-camp-style training, so she is as fit as anyone else we have featured in SELF). Kelly says she doesn't care what people think of her weight. So we say: That is the role model for the rest of us.

See our tips: Self-confidence tips from successful women!

RETOUCHING MYSELF!

Oh, and by the way, today I would let my marathon picture run unaltered. Back when I started at SELF, I was always saying to photographers who would shoot me: "No pimples, no wrinkles, no thighs!" and they'd laugh and remind me I was the one editing the film! Then I realized I could always edit, crop out and correct anything I didn't like later. So I did. But now I video blog (with my little Flip camera) about triathloning and you see me looking like a nearly drowned kitten after a swim, or prerace nervous, or unlit and unmade up. Half the time I am shooting on zoom (inadvertently) and up my nostrils (can't get the angle right, got to hold camera higher!) and guess what? Now I don't care. Because I've gotten more confident in myself. I know what my body can do (thanks to training for triathlons) and that means more to me than how I look on any given day. Do I still get all made up and have my hair done for a portrait or TV appearance? You bet! (I try to even have my own pic taken at a cover shoot since that is when we have the best makeup and photographer and lighting. I'm no fool... use the best when you can get 'em! But I also know that there are times when you just want to be yourself, and that means no artifice. So pictures have different purposes...

ONE MORE THING ON THE KELLY FRONT

You will notice the snapshot of Kelly and her sister Alyssa inside the mag later this month, and she took it with her phone and sent it to us. We ran it. It's a very bloggy moment, and they are both happy, lovely and "normal" looking. It could be any two girls just having fun together, who happen to look almost identical as sisters sometimes do when they're together. In that shot neither looks like a "glammed-up rock star," and that's what I loved about the picture. It's just Kelly and her sis, being themselves. Frankly, those are my favorite pictures, the ones that are snappy happy. My husband has given me an appreciation for the beauty of a snapshot. But that isn't a cover. A cover's job is to sell the magazine, and we do that, every month, thanks to our readers. So thank you.

Your job: Think about your photographs and what you want them to convey. And go ahead and be confident in every shot, in every moment. Because the truest beauty is the kind that comes from within.

MORE FROM SELF:

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 39
  • Patrizio's Avatar
    Posted by Patrizio Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:49pm PDT

    Self is all about being in touch with who you are as a woman and a person, both good and bad. I am a 40 year old MALE psychologist and have two beautiful sisters, and our mother is 70 and has the body of a 30 year old Sophia Loren.

    Both of my sisters are models, and each have given birth to five children. They are tall and have beautiful bodies and all their friends hate that they were given these incredible genetics to be so slim and lovely after having so many children.

    I have also seen my sister with no skin on her face, and a broken neck and leg. Coming home from buying groceries she was hit by a drunk driver. They remove the skin off her once stunning face, as so much glass was in it as her face went through the windshield.

    But my sister is one of the strongest women I know and even though they told her she would never walk right with the broken neck, she let them drill holes into her head and place a metal Hale that she wore for several months. I am happy to say that she made a complete recovery, astounding doctors because she said she had five children to chase and play and spank:)

    Self Magazine...and to women EVERYWHERE!!!

    My sister was most beautiful when having a halo on and no skin on her face she bravely walked through a mall while people stared and bought a swim suit...it is called "Courage"

    Self Magazine, you sell magazines to women telling them they have to be 21 forever and weigh 42 pounds, eating salads for the rest of their life. But that is not beauty. If Kelly Clarkson has a fuller figure, so what? None of us are perfect, yet you try to convey the message that women (and now men's magazines) that we should look perfect.

    You do a terrible wrong by doing all this "Best Picture Possible" nonsense. People are at their best when they accept themselves as unique and beautiful, who do not need a radical makeover and then digital imaging to produce a product...and no longer a person.

    Sincerely,

    Patrizio Vannucci

    Report Abuse
  • Katie B's Avatar
    Posted by Katie B Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:31am PDT

    Patrizio, have you ever read this publication? I have for years and I have NEVER felt pressure from them to "be 21 forever" or "weigh 42 pounds" in fact they reinforce and encourage women to feel great and be great.... they tout happy weights and realistic weight goals, the encourage women to be healthier both physically, mentally and emotionally... I applaude their efforts to bring womens health issues to the forefront... and to help all of us women deal with common problems and themes that most women do... and one of them is weight... but never in my multiple subscriptions to this magazine have I seen women underweight (unless it's an article WARNING us about the dangers of disordered eating and other health issues) or going to extremes to look young..

    Personally I don't care if they retouch Kelly Clarkson or anyone else for that matter, and I have enough faith in this magazine and the editors of SELF to not retouch to such an extreme to make any woman look thinner and/or fitter than they really are.

    Report Abuse
  • Sophia Marie's Avatar
    Posted by Sophia Marie Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:29pm PDT

    I agree with the both of you! Most magazines do give other women negative images of what we should look like but on the other hand people do enjoy looking at beautiful things. The problem however, is not the magazine, honestly self esteem should be encouraged more by parents and I speak from experience. I was never taken to the side and shown how to do my make-up, cute hairstyles and wear flattering outfits. Yeah I know some will say "well beauty is on the inside" but sorry you dreamers that's not the world we live in. I wish it were like that but appearance is very very important these days. Now, that I'm older and do know these beauty tricks I have more self confidence then ever. Do we always look good and feel good? No, everyone has days they feel unnattractive. I have a few of them myselves and where I do not look anything like a model (I'm 5'1 and a chunky monkey) I have learned to appreciate myself and grow up and stop looking at magazines as a tool for what I should look at and take them for what they really are: ENTERTAINMENT!

    Report Abuse
  • marie's Avatar
    Posted by marie Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:47pm PDT

    They retouched this picture of Kelly C to look good and eye-catching...to SELL MAGAZINES. But its a BIG FAT LIE! She doesnt look this "slim" in person. And she's beautiful the way she is (Naturally).

    Sure, some of their article talks about health and loving who you are, this front cover is a total LIE ... a contradiction.

    Report Abuse
  • Máirín's Avatar
    Posted by Máirín Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:46pm PDT

    Wow, what an impressive, over-the-top attempt at covering up a bald-faced lie.

    You can't be a typical magazine and also be about 'inspir[ing] women to want to be their best' - Pick one and stick with it. Don't pretend to be both. You can't say you're inspiring women to be their best while in the same breath excuse your using an erase tool to erase pounds off of your cover models by citing it as a standard industry practice.

    Inspiring women to want to be their best? You're inspiring women to be anorexic by pulling these typical media practices. Color correction is one thing, 'hip surgery' IS NOT of the same type of standard photomanipulation as color and gamma corrections. Get real.

    "(and to set the record straight, she works out and does boot-camp-style training, so she is as fit as anyone else we have featured in SELF). Kelly says she doesn't care what people think of her weight."

    Then why did you do this?

    What a shame, you had a real opportunity and you squandered it. I've lost my trust in your magazine. I will likely cancel my print subscription.

    Report Abuse
  • Fab-U-Lous!'s Avatar
    Posted by Fab-U-Lous! Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:52pm PDT

    As much as I love magazines and Self. ( I am not going to lie, I never picked up a copy until Ashley Tisdale and Vanessa Hudgens were on the cover...BUT that is irrelavant!) My senior year of high school I did a project titled "How do teen magazines affect a girls social life and self esteem?", even though I focused on teens, this still applies to all magazines.

    I think it's amazing that you are trying to teach Women to love who they are. But you lost my vote once you admitted that 1) You did touch up Kelly and 2)You touch up your own photos to enter the magazine. I understand it's your own personal choice, but what exactly are you teaching these stars and your team that works at Self? "Ohh...we are going to put in a gorgeous setting, with beautiful clothes, make-up hair and you look fabulous! BUT WAIT! These photos aren't good enough to go public! Let's edit them!"

    It's just a never ending cycle that needs to stop. Please don't get me wrong, I love the whole point of Self Magazine. But you have even lowered your own self-confidence by not allowing a photo of you after job well done to run in a magazine because it's not good enough or you aren't in a proper attire or whatever. It actually really sad.

    If all these ladies (stars on the cover) are behind the whole process, good for them. But I definitely do not support it, and I think it only shows how one's appearance is more important than anything else about them.

    Report Abuse
  • Máirín's Avatar
    Posted by Máirín Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:52pm PDT

    I just canceled my subscription.

    Report Abuse
  • Beth's Avatar
    Posted by Beth Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:45am PDT

    I am sorry, but I disagree. You're trying to cover the ball in all parts of the field; that is to say, wherever you THINK it may land. Did KELLY ask you to reduce her size on the cover? If she is happy and confident as is, why change her appearance? You changed her appearance because you thought she was too heavy to be on your cover the way she truly is, and that is the bottom line. You thought it wouldn't sell magazines. If she works out and is "as fit as anyone in (your) magazine" as you say, why wasn't she acceptable as is? You say she's happy and confident and has joie de vivre- well, then why do you feel the need to change this? People who aren't model slim work out and try to look their best, and your blatant message to all of us is, if you don't look like a size 2, you don't belong on our cover- in other words, Kelly, how great that you're talented and happy and confident, but you're much too fat, so let's alter your appearance so you appeal to what we THINK the readers want. Isn't one's personal best just that- personal? Perhaps you can get Victoria Beckham for the cover- she seems to fit what you need and what you THINK readers want.

    Report Abuse
  • TAY's Avatar
    Posted by TAY Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:02am PDT

    I assume every magazine image is altered, so it came as no surprise to me.

    The one thing that stood out to me in this article is that you say you are confident in your body, yet you had picutres altered because, "it just didn't look the way I wanted in every picture." So, it seems to me that you are not/ were not confident in your body. You were confident in the preceived image of your body, the ideal that you held. Once a photo came along that shattered that image, you felt the need to correct it.

    As a photographer, former model, and artist I understand the logistics of taking a picture thinking you look one way, and seeing the picture realizing you look another.

    Report Abuse
  • Gayathri's Avatar
    Posted by Gayathri Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:55am PDT

    I agree with mairindubh, your attempt at explanation has raised a few more questions that justified your stand. For a magazine that claims to help women improve their self-esteem and confidence you just fell down the pedestal when you air-brushed the cover pic, especially when the person in question is Kelly Clarkson who has this amazing confidence of who she is.

    Your favourite pic might be the one untouched one but by choosing to select an airbrushed piece for the cover, you have just conveyed one message that you are just people pretending to talk about confidence when your personal ideal is no different from what the media is pushing young people to look like.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 39

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Health Byte

Get healthy foods for your family that won’t take a bite out of your budget.  Healthy living costs less at Walmart.