Healthy Living

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Should We Be Eating Way Less?

Last week, two interesting studies were published: Our rate of obesity continues to climb and now 25% of adults in 31 states are clinically obese; some states classify almost a third of their population as obese. Add that population to the one that is termed overweight and we are talking about more than two-thirds of Americans as somewhat or very overweight.

The following day, an article on the front page of The New York Times revealed that rhesus monkeys that have followed 20 years of a calorie-restrictive diet (30% less calories than the norm) were in much better health than those primates who ate a regular diet. "The monkeys are showing many beneficial signs of caloric resistance, including significantly less diabetes, cancer, and heart and brain disease," writes author Nicholas Wade. What are we to make of this? To me, what this all signifies is that it's important to keep the spare tire off, and to exercise as much as possible, and eat as healthfully as possible. BUT, I would never want to (or even be able to) live life without a few caloric pleasures, like chocolate, ice cream, and butter. What about you? Would you consider giving up your favorite foods if it could add a year or two to your life?


by Tanya Steel

MORE HEALTHY FEATURES FROM EPICURIOUS.COM

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 23
  • Jett's Avatar
    Posted by Jett Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:06am PDT

    No. Plain and simple. I'm not saying chocolate is more important to me than life. I'm saying I'm not going to give up having fun (like eating a slice of birthday cake or having a cinnamon roll on Christmas morning) just to squeeze out every single drop of life. I'd rather have a good life full of enjoyment that ends when I'm in my 60s than have a boring, strict one that gets me to 90. That's just me. That doesn't mean I'm going to just toss health out the window, but then I don't think that's what you're asking, either. :)

    Report Abuse
  • Jett's Avatar
    Posted by Jett Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:07am PDT

    What do you mean by a "normal" monkey diet, by the way? The monkeys aren't eating chocolate and butter. Why would their "normal" diet be unhealthy for them?

    Report Abuse
  • Eddieslilangel's Avatar
    Posted by Eddieslilangel Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:48am PDT

    dude, just live life to the fullest!!

    Report Abuse
  • Eva's Avatar
    Posted by Eva Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:09am PDT

    NO. I will not give up chocolate. I may minimize them but I will not deprive myself. Same with other food. The key is moderation. I sometimes over indulge but I also cut back the next day and I do walk and dance a lot.

    Report Abuse
  • HawkeyeGirl's Avatar
    Posted by HawkeyeGirl Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:42pm PDT

    Those macrobiotic diets and super-restrictive diets are creepy and unhealthy. Eat in moderation and you'll live a heathy life.

    And like other's have noted, how can a monkey's diet compare with a human's?

    Report Abuse
  • cindy's Avatar
    Posted by cindy Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:03am PDT

    Eating a strict diet doesn't always mean you will live to be 100. YOu may have a strict boring live and then be killed in a freak accident. You should live, laugh and love to the fullest! Have a drink and a candy bar, and live like there is no tomorrow, because tomorrow is not garaunteed.

    Report Abuse
  • Joy in Seattle's Avatar
    Posted by Joy in Seattle Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:21am PDT

    About 6 months ago, I severely changed my diet. I've already lost 5 inches on my waistline, but the amazing thing is how much better I feel! I think the point of a restrictive diet isn't adding 5yrs, it's about adding health to your life. One study said that it puts aging back about 16yrs. Isn't feeling great worth getting rid of that soda, cake, chips, and junk?

    As for those super restrictive, almost starvation diets... I don't agree with those, but if you think you "should" eat 2000 calories, maybe you shouldn't be eating 2100 every day and might want to try 1800 instead.

    Report Abuse
  • Val's Avatar
    Posted by Val Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:05am PDT

    If it would only add 1 to 2 years to your life it is not worth it. Taste buds need to be satisfied. I do restrict my calories to 2000 a day for weight management. This does not mean no chocolate or ice cream. When I eat a pint of Ben & Jerrys I just eat less the rest of the day!

    Report Abuse
  • Ms. L's Avatar
    Posted by Ms. L Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:49am PDT

    I am constantly surprised when people comment on topics they have no knowledge about. I really should get over that.

    Living on a calorie restricted diet DOES NOT mean depriving yourself of all food pleasure.

    It simply means that in total fewer calories are taken in, with a focus on eating vegetables and fruits (among other super nutritious foods). Veggies and fruit have more nutrients per calorie which makes them ideal for the human body (along with lean proteins like fish and chicken).

    The focus of a calorie restricted diet is to live a long HEALTHY life. Yes, you may make it to 80 on an average American diet, but as my grandfather can attest, they most likely will not be healthy years. He has battled his weight for decades, had a heart attack, had bypass surgery, has type 2 diabetes, takes meds for his diabetes and high blood pressure, and has recently had surgery to clear clogged arteries in his neck. His doctor tells him constantly: eat better and exercise.

    I am on a calorie restricted diet. I eat dessert. I eat bread and cheese. I eat wonderful meals that consist of meat, veggies and pasta.

    I focus on eating mostly vegetables, fruit and lean protein. I try to avoid sugar, most oils (olive and coconut excluded), and most processed foods.

    I would also like to point out that once you brain and mouth adjust, fruits and veggies are what you crave. Right now I am thinking of a nice big peach on my counter at home. Candy and cake sounds pretty gross.

    Does this diet mean I can't eat mac and cheese out of a box? Yep. Candy? Sure. But in exchange I feel great. You would too, if you let go of the lollipop long enough to find out.

    Report Abuse
  • EnCee's Avatar
    Posted by EnCee Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:47am PDT

    Forget the monkeys! They make a pretty good point, but that's not what the article is about.

    Just remember that you should never eat more than your body needs every day. If you have a treat it should not make you feel like you're about to bust open at the seams. Would you keep pumping air into a balloon even through it was full? If you did it would eventually pop. Just like the human body. Eventually, too much food makes us sick one way or the other.

    When we talk about giving up foods, it's more about giving up huge portions that none of us work off. Yes, I agree that 90% if us would be much better off if we shaved our calorie count by 200 to 400 calories per day.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 23

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Health Byte

Get healthy foods for your family that won’t take a bite out of your budget.  Healthy living costs less at Walmart.