Healthy Living

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Why Michael Jackson's doctor may not be to blame

Within the past 48 hours, Michael Jackson's death has been ruled a homicide by the LA County coroner's office.  This tells us simply that the actions of someone else contributed to, or caused, Mr. Jackson's death, which we more or less already knew.  That someone else apparently was Mr. Jackson's personal physician, Dr. Conrad Murray.

The conclusion of homicide was based partly or wholly on the confirmation of the medication propofol in Mr. Jackson's system at the time of his death. Propofol is an anesthetic agent administered intravenously, the only approved use of which is inducing and maintaining an unconscious state in intubated (i.e., placed temporarily on a respirator) patients undergoing medical procedures such as surgery.

So, at first blush, use of propofol as a sleep aid is  not simply creative—it is clearly inappropriate and out of bounds.  A responsible medical practitioner shouldn't do such a thing.  In Mr. Jackson's case, propofol use was compounded by the use of benzodiazepine sedatives, including Valium and Ativan, habit-forming and potentially dangerous drugs in their own right.  These, at least, however, are legitimately used in the out-patient setting as a matter of routine. In light of the irresponsible and dangerous administration of drugs he oversaw, Dr. Murray is easily cast as the villain here.  And, indeed, there is a good chance he will be prosecuted.  But I think we should be cautious about a rush to judgment. Here’s why:

Between any doctor and patient there is something of a pact, an implicit if not explicit agreement to respect the relationship and make it work.  The patient, ultimately, is the boss—deciding when he or she is satisfied, what he or she is willing to do, what he or she needs. But the patient should respect the doctor's role, which is all about expertise.  A patient's requests and demands should be tempered by a doctor's advice. Otherwise, the pact breaks down, and the relationship ceases to work in the patient's best interest.

Maintaining this effective interaction can be challenging under ordinary circumstances—and let's face it—taking care of Michael Jackson must have been anything but ordinary.  Mr. Jackson's idiosyncrasies, iconic status as one of the world's best-known celebrities, and rather bizarre medical history all suggest he was likely a very atypical patient, requiring atypical care. For the moment, let's assume that Mr. Jackson found  ordinary sleep aids insufficient, and demanded something more.  Any doctor caring for him would presumably know that what Michael Jackson wants, Michael Jackson gets—if not here, then elsewhere.  

While I have never done anything nearly so off-the-reservation as administering propofol for insomnia, I have—many times—given in to patient demands and done things about which I felt ambivalence at best.  My job is always to find a way to help my patients, and sometimes none of the options left is all that terrific.  There have been times I felt: better to try something a little uncomfortable than hit the wall now, and lose this relationship altogether.  No one likes to fail in the mission to which they have dedicated their lives.

Did Dr. Murray callously prescribe potentially lethal medication to Mr. Jackson with wanton disregard for the potential consequences?  Did he reluctantly, resistantly, and incrementally yield to Mr. Jackson's insistence?  Or was it something in between?

Documentation emerging from the on-going investigation certainly does not suggest indifference or neglect by Dr. Murray.  In fact, he apparently was at Mr. Jackson's bedside throughout the night prior to the star's death, administering medication and monitoring the effects.  On the one hand, this places Dr. Murray at the “scene of the crime,' as it were, and figures in his implication.  On the other, what was in it for him, other than a sleepless night?  Continuous treatment of insomnia from 1AM to 10AM does not sound like fun, and is certainly beyond the call of routine medical duty.  Perhaps this is the level of devotion required to be Michael Jackson's doctor.Certainly, there is no suggestion that Mr. Jackson's death was anyone's intention. And I suspect if Dr. Murray did not acquiesce to Mr. Jackson's requests, someone else would have become Mr. Jackson's personal physician.

Some of this tale is unique to the world of high-profile, high-powered celebrity.  But some is not.  Here are the implications for the rest of us:

1. It takes two to tango. The doctor-patient relationship is just that—a relationship.  It works only as well as the interaction.  The best analogy may be an athlete and coach.  The coach coaches, but the athlete decides what he or she is willing to do.  Mutual respect, mutual trust, and mutual effort are crucial for success.

15 ways to have a better relationship with your doc

2) You can't always get what you want. But you just may find, to quote Jagger, you get what you need.  As a patient, find a doctor you can trust—and then do just that.  If you want “more,” ask for it—but don't assume that everything you think you want is a good idea.  Propofol-induced sleep may sound tempting, but it's a bad idea if the chances are high that sleep will be permanent rather than temporary!  Doctors will sometimes have to say “no” not because they don't want to help, but because they do.

Are you taking the wrong med? (Up to 50% of patients may be!)

3) Stay the course. There are many reasons why medical care might run off the rails, but a common one is doctor shopping: Patients who keep looking for a doctor who will do what they want.  I advise against this.  Instead, find a doctor whose knowledge, compassion, commitment and judgment you value—then stay the course.  If that doctor won't give in to what you want, it's probably for good reason.  And finding one who will may be a bad idea.  Even ... lethal.

What everyone should know about second opinions

4) Balance the power. When you seek medical care, it is about you, your body, your life.  So you should be the boss.  But. Your doctor has years of training, and rarefied knowledge and expertise you lack.  And visiting Wikipedia or searching the Internet for an hour does not make up the gap!  As the saying goes, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing!  Doctors must respect their patient's autonomy, and final authority over their choices.  Patients must respect their doctors' expertise, and show some humility.  I can't know, of course, but I suspect this pact broke down in the care of Mr. Jackson.

4 times you should never self-diagnose

More Smart Advice on Staying Healthy

14 health mistakes even smart women make
Tired all the time? 7 signs it’s something serious
5 vitamins you’re not taking, but should be



Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 155
  • kc's Avatar
    Posted by kc Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:15am PDT

    The patient does bear responsibility as well.

    Report Abuse
  • Life's Avatar
    Posted by Life Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:10am PDT

    Michael Jackson had many issues which can be seen even in his personal appearance over the years.

    Yes, Michael had to agree to whatever meds he was taking or requesting.

    Report Abuse
  • another hockey fan's Avatar
    Posted by another hockey fan Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:11am PDT

    "Any doctor caring for him would presumably know that what Michael Jackson wants, Michael Jackson gets—if not here, then elsewhere." This is the most conclusive sentence in the post. He was on a road to self-destruction before his death and the ironic part is, it's about sleep deprivation and not something more serious like before, with his pain meds. It was just a matter of time, folks. The same thing could be said for Elvis, and any other famous person who can't function without a constant barrage of drugs in their system. It's not an excuse, it's not an attack on MJ, or a blame-game, it's the truth. I think the doctor is NOT at fault. He was doing the best he could under the circumstances.

    Report Abuse
  • Jen's Avatar
    Posted by Jen Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:54am PDT

    Although, it sounds like you make many legitimate medical points, I believe your comments are skewed toward sympathy for Dr. Murray. I would love to hear a legal expert's opinion which I believe might suggest that the legal responsibilities lie with the "last man standing," which would unfortunately be Dr. Murray. At any rate, he was the person who had the last, best chance to keep Michael from dying. From what I have read and heard about this, if they don't find him totally criminally liable, he will most likely could be found partially so.

    Report Abuse
  • RS's Avatar
    Posted by RS Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:12am PDT

    Im sorry I know we all do the best we can but at what point will the Oth take over and we realy understand their was a greater responability. I dont realy know what to say but I would have rather been the cook hopefully Michale would not have died from my bad cooking...

    But sometimes money talks and wisdom ?....

    Report Abuse
  • Frantastic's Avatar
    Posted by Frantastic Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:19am PDT

    Bull dookie. I have been saying this and will continue. Oath over-rides what the patient thinks. So yeah the doc screwed up. Why do you think MJ had to find the ones that were willing to compromise. Well he finally (no pun at all intended)did.

    Report Abuse
  • Queen eliene b.'s Avatar
    Posted by Queen eliene b. Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:10am PDT

    This is crap! What happened to just say no? Now, the doc has lost his life style as well as Mr. Jackson losing his entire life! Sometimes, I have personally found, you have to JUST SAY NO to ridiculous behavior! PERIOD!

    Report Abuse
  • Dr. David L. Katz's Avatar
    Posted by Dr. David L. Katz Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:30am PDT

    I quite agree with those suggesting that a doctor needs to take responsibility for decisions in such circumstances- and I am not writing to defend the decisions that were made, or the doctor that either made them, or went along with them.

    But I am noting that if great responsibility comes with the great power of medical decisions, then this age of patient-centered care and shared decision-making inescapably imposes a burden of shared responsibility. None of us has ever had to say 'no way!' to Michael Jackson. I am guessing it might have been rather hard to do, and make it stick. And doubtless, Mr. Jackson was well aware of that.

    Report Abuse
  • sam's Avatar
    Posted by sam Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:55pm PDT

    come on! honestly... did you have to use that picture? i mean, it's been definitely tampered with in order to make him look more pale than he really was...

    Report Abuse
  • RobynM's Avatar
    Posted by RobynM Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:25pm PDT

    Its all about money, Michael Jackson knew he could get the Doctor he was paying to get him the drugs and administer them. Michael Jackson should take personal responsibility for what was happening in his own life. I'm sure he knew of the dangers. To prosecute this doctor with homicide is just wrong in my opinion.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 155

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Updates Chatter on Shine…

Health Byte

How likely are you to be a workout drop-out? Take our quiz to size up your chances of exercise success.