Manage Your Life

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Have you experienced the "motherhood penalty"?

Getty Images

Getty Images

We know there is still work to do to close the wage gap between women and men. But researchers at Cornell University say there is another gap to close between two groups of women--mothers and their peers without children. They call it the "motherhood penalty" because they found through an experimental study that if two women with similar experience and skills apply for a job, the one who is a mother is less likely to get it.

Using fake resumes for two equally qualified candidates–one childless, one a mom—the researchers found that the mother was 100-percent less likely to be hired when she applied for a position. Mothers were consistently ranked as less competent and less committed than women who were not moms. "I was not surprised to find that mothers were discriminated against, but I was very surprised by the magnitude of the discrimination," wrote Shelley Correll, now an associate sociology professor at Stanford University and one of the lead researchers. "With gender or race, we often talk about the subtle ways that stereotypes are disadvantaging. With mothers, the effects were huge, such as being about 100% less likely to be recommended for hire than
childless women and being offered much lower starting salaries."

As for men, fathers got higher ratings than guys without kids.

In another study by the researchers, fake resumes were used to apply to 638 real jobs (entry-level and mid-level marketing and business jobs) during an 18-month period. Tracking interview requests, childless women got 2.1 times as many callbacks as mothers with similar credentials. There was no difference among fathers and childless men.

Any work that shines light on discrimination against any group of workers is valuable. My only concern with the first part of this particular study, which received a prestigous work-family research award, is that the fake resumes of fictional women were reviewed and acted upon by "paid undergraduate volunteers." Sure, some of the undergrads may one day work their way into hiring manager positions, and that's a big concern if they look at mothers negatively when they get there. I think (and hope) you'd get a very different outcome if all of the resumes were placed before seasoned HR professionals, though the second part of the study is truly discouraging. If the women's experience and skill sets were truly similar, a good hiring manager would not see a negative in motherhood. A really good one would see the added value that a parent's perspective can bring to a job.

Still, plenty of research studies have documented a wage gap between mothers and nonmothers. Ann Crittenden, author of "The Price of Motherhood," found for women under the age of 35,
the pay gap between mothers and nonmothers is larger than the pay gap between men and women. So, despite the experimental nature of the research, the results are still unsettlng. Have you felt the effects of a "motherhood penalty"?

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 220
  • Lisa's Avatar
    Posted by Lisa Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:21am PDT

    As a supervisor, I totally understand the bias. All the things that make a woman a great mother also make her a problem employee. It is nature for a mother to need to be with her sick child rather than leave the child with another family member. Often there is no one else who can watch the child and day care will not take a child who is sick or running a fever. So, the mother has to miss work to be with her child. And all that is just if the child is sick. If the child gets in trouble at school, Mom once again has to leave work to fix the problem. Employers understand that they come in second to a mother's obligations to her children so they tend to hire women who aren't mothers or have already raised their children.

    Report Abuse
  • amym's Avatar
    Posted by amym Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:33am PDT

    As a childless career woman, I've often had projects handed to me at the 11th hour because a coworker has to leave to pick up the kids, get home to their family, etc. I choose to put my career first and if employers recognize that, then so be it. Mothers in the workplace get much more lenience, and are not penalized for days off to care for sick children, can leave early at the drop of a hat, etc. so if they think they are being discriminated against, I can assure you they are not. Not from my perspective anyway.

    Report Abuse
  • oohay's Avatar
    Posted by oohay Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:47am PDT

    There is no doubt that kids pull on a mothers time and thus makes them miss days of work and have to take off early more often. But that’s part of mothers role, the kids are more important and come first; nothing wrong with that. When my wife and I planned to have our first child we decided ahead of time that in order for our kids to be raised right we would need to make some financial sacrifices, she cut her work to part time so to have more time with our child. That’s the trade off we choose to make, our kids are our most important investment and are worth the cut in household income.

    Report Abuse
  • cutebanker's Avatar
    Posted by cutebanker Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:58am PDT

    i don't find it odd that companies would hire the childless woman first. from a company's perspective- they probably feel they are getting more work for their dollar. i know plenty of hard working mothers but i also know many that would quit their jobs in a heartbeat to stay home if they could or work shortened shifts or have to leave constantly because their babysitter called off. this is probably the only time i've heard of any special treatment going towards the non-mothers, and there most certainly is a bias in the business world that mothers don't work as hard.

    i find this study to be skewed because there is no way 2 resumes can be exactly the same except for motherhood. i don't believe a potential employer even has the right to ask you if you are married or have children. that is not information you have to disclose. that's like them asking a woman if she's pregnant!!! and as for that, employers are still taking the risk that their childless female employees will have children too.

    of course this issue does not affect men as much! duh! it's not rocket science. most men are not the primary care givers and being a husband/father shows stability and dedication. although i have had single male friends get a job because it required extensive travel and the company did not feel that a married man would be as open to that.

    Report Abuse
  • Rowdygirl's Avatar
    Posted by Rowdygirl Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:28am PDT

    Being child-free myself, the only discrimination I've ever seen has been against those who DON'T have children. I agree with Amym... parents have way more leniency when it comes to personal matters than those without children. Could I bring my sick cat to work with me? Of course not... now parents will say that a pet and a child are completely different, but my point is valid. You can't justify special treatment for someone just because they popped out a kid or two.

    I used to work for a local newpaper, where I was the only person in the dept. without kids. Guess who worked all the holidays? Yep.. me. I was actually told that since I didn't have kids, it shouldn't matter as much to me. Think that's fair?

    Report Abuse
  • j's Avatar
    Posted by j Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:42am PDT

    100% less likely to be hired?? Someone needs to revisit basic math. 100% less likely to be hired means that a mother never gets hired when competing with a non-mother. Then looking at the statement that childless women are 2.1 times more likely to be hired than mothers, this means that a childless woman is 110% more likely to be hired than a mother. That doesn't mean a mother is 110% less likely to be hired than a childless woman.

    Report Abuse
  • j's Avatar
    Posted by j Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:43am PDT

    By the way, this means that a mother is 48% as likely to be hired as a childless woman, not 100% less likely.

    Report Abuse
  • eccc's Avatar
    Posted by eccc Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:46am PDT

    It's unfortunate but I do understand employers hiring women without children. I don't have children and I work with with a lot of women that do have children of their own. It seems that their children are always the go-to excuse for not working the crap hours and who has to cover said crap shifts? The women that don't have children...i.e. me! Sometimes I wonder why some of these mothers' children get "sick" so often. But the point is that some mothers are unpredictable as to how often they will call in.

    Report Abuse
  • Sandy's Avatar
    Posted by Sandy Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:50am PDT

    As a mother, I think it gives me an advantage to be an ideal employee because I am not focusing on myself, but rather making sure that I have enough money to be able to feed my child. Then again, I also have a husband and family around that can help if she gets sick. But, I can see why employers would discriminate since children do get sick so much. The thing that bothers me is that as a result of the Anti-Discrimination laws that are in effect, it is illegal to even ask someone if they are married and have children in an interview, so why would anyone discuss their personal life on a resume? To me that would show more interest in personal life than a professional life which in my opinion could have biased the people who reviewed the resume from the get go. To say you are an Eagle Scout is one thing, but to put that you are the mother of an Eagle Scout is another.

    Report Abuse
  • Beth's Avatar
    Posted by Beth Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:51am PDT

    It irks me to no end how many times I've ended up having extra work because a co-worker had a kid related issue. And then when I have something that keeps me from meeting a deadline or out of the office I catch flack the mom never caught. Yeah, I have no issue with companies hiring the woman without kids first.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 220

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

manage your life byte

from Target

All kinds of wonderful. Gifts, solutions and savings all in one place. Find every merry solution at Target.