Manage Your Life

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Obama proposals include 401k, 403b, 457, and IRA changes

<p><img src="http://knol.google.com/k/-/-/jktyd5jujhex/4k169q/01468x601.gif" alt="" height="60" width="468"><br> </p> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.erollover.com/index2.php?id=122"><strong style="color:#ff0000;">Sign up here for a chance to win </strong><br> <strong style="color:#ff0000;">an Online and Print Wall Street Journal Subscription!</strong></a> <br> <br> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.erollover.com">www.eRollover.com</a> <p><strong>Obama proposals include <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink3" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;">retirement</span></a> plan changes</strong></p> <p>Referencing the article By David Pitt, AP Business Writer </p> <p>We have gotten fervent feedback to our recent articles about the changes to your <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink16" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;background-color:transparent;">401k</span></a> , 403b, 457, and IRA accounts that may change under the Barack Obama Presidency. eRollover is striving to keep you up to date on these possible changes. I am actually referencing an article by David Pitt to delve a little bit further into possible 401k and retirement changes. The original article can be found <a rel="nofollow" href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081106/401k_insight.html?.v=1">here</a>.<br> <strong><br> Retirement initiatives among economic priorities in Obama administration </strong></p> <p>The election is over and the message is clear — the economy is priority one. The big question now is how some of President-elect Barack Obama’s campaign proposals will affect retirees and workers with 401(k) and other <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink4" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">retirement </span><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">accounts</span></a> . Looking at them a bit closer may reveal some clues.</p> <p>Q: What are some of the ideas Obama has proposed that could impact my <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink5" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;background-color:transparent;">retirement </span><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;background-color:transparent;">planning</span></a> ?</p> <p>A: One issue Obama has endorsed may get serious consideration before he takes the oath of office in January.</p> <p>Obama proposed a temporary suspension of the required minimum distribution rule, which forces tens of millions of retirees to take money out of their IRA and 401(k) accounts once they turn 70 1/2. The rule is designed to give the government its share of the <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink7" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">taxes</span></a> on the money, which has been accumulating <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink8" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;background-color:transparent;">tax </span><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;background-color:transparent;">free</span></a> . Failure to take out the money results in a 50 percent penalty assessed by the IRS.</p> <p><br> </p> <p>Suspending the mandatory withdrawal would allow people to keep the money in the account and possibly recover some of their losses when the market recovers.</p> <p>Obama’s plan would temporarily waive the penalties and taxes on withdrawals made after age 70 1/2. There’s interest in Congress to get it done — sooner rather than later.</p> <p>The chairman of the House Committee on Education and Labor, Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., has asked Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to suspend the <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink9" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">tax </span><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">penalty</span></a> immediately.</p> <p>AARP, the Washington-based group that represents 39 million people aged 50 and older, also has urged Paulson to take the action right away.</p> <p>David Certner, the group’s legislative policy director said the required withdrawals essentially force retirees to take money out of the market at the bottom, recording large losses, rather than letting them keep their money in the account to potentially recoup the losses when the market improves.</p> <p>Department of Treasury spokesman Andrew DeSouza said Wednesday he had nothing to report on the issue and declined to comment further.</p> <p><br> </p> <p>“There’s absolutely no reason to force people to take out a larger share of their current account at the bottom of the market,” said Monique Morrissey, an economist with the Washington-based Economic Policy Institute. “It doesn’t make any sense at all.”<br> A second proposal made by President-elect Obama would allow workers to make hardship withdrawals of up to 15 percent of their balance from <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink10" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">individual </span><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">retirement </span><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">accounts</span></a> or 401(k) plans this year and in 2009. A withdrawal of up to $10,000 would not be subject to the 10 percent <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink11" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">early </span><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">withdrawal </span><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">penalty</span></a> charged by the IRS, but normal <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink12" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">income </span><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">tax</span></a> would be due.</p> <p>Some economists believe too many 401(k) plans already are underfunded and too frequently tapped for <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink13" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;background-color:transparent;">loans</span></a> or early withdrawals, and making such a change sends the wrong message.</p> <p>“I know people are feeling pain, but if you raid the piggy <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink14" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-weight:400;font-size:12px;">bank</span></a> every time there’s market downturn or recession, you will not have enough left in the piggy bank for old age,” Kra said.</p> <p><strong>Please visit our site for more Retirement, 401k, and <a rel="nofollow" id="KonaLink15" style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://erollover.com/blog/obama-401k/obama-401k-403b-ira-change#"><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;background-color:transparent;">Insurance </span><span style="color:#009600 important;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;background-color:transparent;">information</span></a> :</strong><br> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.erollover.com">www.erollover.com</a></p>
Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-5 of 5
  • RobR's Avatar
    Posted by RobR Fri Nov 7, 2008 11:02pm PST

    I had heard on Sean Hannity's radio show and also on Rush Limbaugh's show that Obama plans to take all of our 401k's, 403 b's IRA's Roth IRA's etc...and SLAM them into our social security......and guarantee us 3% on the money. Is this true? Is this a possibility? It smacks of socialism. I'm already retired....not drawing SS yet.....and am counting on my $150,000 in my IRA's to help me live a comfortable lifestyle before I get my ss. I NEED information on this!

    Report Abuse
  • Mike R's Avatar
    Posted by Mike R Sat Nov 8, 2008 10:04am PST

    We are all concerned about these developments. You may want to subscribe to my Blog or RSS feed at www.erollover.com/blog

    Also, membership to our website www.erollover.com is free and we have a bunch of qualified advisors to assist.

    Report Abuse
  • JustSayNO's Avatar
    Posted by JustSayNO Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:22pm PST

    Congress has been unwilling to touch Social Security (SS). The problem now is the crushed stock market. Any chance we had to reform SS to allow individuals to manage some of their SS money is shredded beyond recognition. Congress will use this as an excuse not to make changes to the SS "Trust Fund", which is a false term as there is no "Trust Fund", and raise the taxble limits to potentially no cap.

    Surplus cash collected by SS taxes is put in the General Fund and replaced by an IOU note. Each year, for the past 10+ years, there has been a $300B surplus in SS collections. Imagine if that money had been put into an interest bearing account? Think of the money we'd have to fund SS.

    But no, this is not how the government works. Trust them, they know what is best. Bush didn't do anything on SS either. This is just plain and simple government inefficiency at its dullest best, and it impact those who need the money the most; retirees on with very limited savings. SS is more a minimum wage for retirees and not something to be dependant on after retirement.

    The ONLY way to prosperity is less government, not more, and that means Obama-nomics are only going to make things worse. Yes, there will be change, more like we'll have to change an over-flowing diaper in 4 years.

    Government has proven it can't and won't do everything it says it can. They are not Big Daddy, more like Forest Gump; stupid is as stupid does. Of any of the canidates on each side, only Mitt Romney had the management skills we needed to have any decent chance of good change, and less of a load in the ol' Huggies.

    Report Abuse
  • MrJuly4th's Avatar
    Posted by MrJuly4th Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:55pm PST

    "Bush" didn't do anything on SS either."

    While the President can directly propose legislation, he must rely on supporters in Congress to promote and support his legislative agenda. The Constitution grants numerous powers to Congress. These include the powers: to levy and collect taxes, provide for common defense and promote the pursuit of liberty; to coin money and regulate its value; provide for punishment for counterfeiting; establish post offices and roads, promote progress of science, create courts inferior to the Supreme Court, define and punish piracies and felonies, declare war, raise and support armies, provide and maintain a navy, make rules for the regulation of land and naval forces, provide for, arm, and discipline the militia, exercise exclusive legislation in the District of Columbia, and make laws necessary and proper to execute the powers of Congress.

    The Executive Branch cannot make laws IRT to SS only Congress can do that. Both Republicans and Democrats have controlled Congress during the Bush Administration with nothing be accomplished to fix the problem. Let's what a Congress controlled by the Democrats and the Executive Branch led by a Socialist, Obama will bring us. It only scares me to death.

    Report Abuse
  • David K's Avatar
    Posted by David K Tue Mar 3, 2009 11:33am PST

    Your all screwed anyways..... I voted for McCain and am financially secure so it won't drain me. Nobama and all of the (looking thru the straw) liberals will suffer greatly. Too bad he was voted in office. Its change they wanted and change their gonna get! Too bad he has no experience also. Well considering 90% of the liberals don't even know who Nancy Palosi is make me wonder why they were even allowed to vote in the first place. Shows how naive this country really is!

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-5 of 5

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

manage your life byte

from Target

All kinds of wonderful. Gifts, solutions and savings all in one place. Find every merry solution at Target.