Manage Your Life

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Proud of your multitasking? Think again.

Today’s post comes out of desperation.

I spend my days toggling between computer windows. I start reading something, take a break to check email or Twitter, chase a link and open another window, telling myself I’ll get back to that first window later. I return to the item I was working on, many moments later, only to have completely lost my train of thought. At the end of the day, I close down the computer with some 20 or 30 windows open. If I’m using Firefox, my good fortune (or punishment) is that the next time I start up, those windows greet me anew, creating a virtual to-do list that I’m just as unlikely to get to as I was when I first opened each of them.

My multitasking is not confined to my laptop. While preparing my morning tea, I might be paying a bill and getting it ready for the mail, fixing the dog’s food and my own cereal, and trying to pay attention to the morning news. (After all, we should be able to do things while just “listening” since that’s we do while driving.)  As my fiance passes me on his way to the shower, I kiss him and half-heartedly engage in a “what are we doing tonight” exchange while still trying to listen to the news. I’m waiting for the day the dog’s kibble ends up in my cereal bowl.

I knew I had a problem when I was on the phone with my mother and had to ask her to repeat what she’d just said about a recent visit to her doctor because I had momentarily left the conversation to read an incoming text message on my cell phone. That’s when I picked up Dave Crenshaw'sThe Myth of Multitasking: How Doing it All Get’s Nothing Done,” a little book that has been taunting me, for many months.

I’m usually wary of business books told in fable form, but I was immediately sucked into this one with its cast of office characters designed to debunk the myth that multitasking is a smart way to get things done.

Sally, the frazzled CEO, hires Phil, a business coach, because she knows she has a problem but can’t quite put a name to it. In a scene-setting opening chapter, we get a glimpse of Sally’s work environment where she can barely engage in a conversation with Phil because Sally, her right-hand-gal, is always dropping by Sally's office with “one quick question,” and unexpected phone calls take her off task.

Phil, the coach, makes a quick score with Sally by having her perform a simple exercise. He asks her write a six word sentence on one line and a numerical strand on the line beneath it by adding one character at a time to each row. Then he has her write the sentence straight through on the first line before moving to the row of numbers. Phil times Sally both times and the result is stark -- when she moves between the two lines, it takes 63 seconds. When she writes each line straight through, it takes only 29 seconds. Lesson number one, the cost of "switchtasking," has been taught.

Helen, the constantly interrupting subordinate, knocks on Sally’s door throughout the day because she has no idea when she might next get time with her boss. Which provides a nice setup for the book’s next big lesson -- the proper use of a calendar to organize time for recurring meetings and to block off chunks of time for big tasks. This is an area where I already have some good systems in place, but the book’s oversimplified approach to calendar management left me feeling that my extreme dependence on my calendar was a healthy rather than obsessive relationship.

My only complaint about this book was that the sidebars scattered throughout the book offering time management data or quotes from the ages distracted me. Was I supposed to interrupt my reading of the chapter text to process these or catch up with them all once I finished the chapter? I alternated between the two approaches (without timing myself or testing my comprehension), but still, I know that I had a momentary disconnect with the text each time I paused to read something like a Russian proverb telling me that when I chase two rabbits, I’ll not catch either one.

By the time I was just halfway through the book, I was able to stop myself from switchtasking by telling myself that the task I was drawn to, that link I wanted to read, that awaiting email, would still be there once I finished the project at hand. I didn’t get out the stopwatch but it was obvious that the saved minutes were racking up. I’ve even decided that there are times during my day where I can indulge in some switchtasking, moving between the comments on this blog, various news sites, Facebook, Twitter, IM, and email. But those times are not when I’m trying to write or engage in focused thought. And those times are now on the calendar. If not the real one, then the one in my head. At least for now.

We’ll see how long I go before I have to pick up this little book again.

Anyone have any other good tips on how to avoid multitasking?
Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 17
  • Rowdygirl's Avatar
    Posted by Rowdygirl Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:40am PDT

    I understand exactly what you're saying. I think all this multi-tasking in really hurting us instead of helping. I have found that I REALLY have to concentrate when I'm reading. Especially, if I'm reading a real book. Sounds weird, but I used to be able to just zone into the book and push all the outside distractions away. Now I find that I have to re-read passages, or sometimes whole pages because I realize I just skimmed the page. I click, click, click all day at work and my brain is starting to auto-pilot normal tasks too. Scary.

    Report Abuse
  • yaya's Avatar
    Posted by yaya Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:55am PDT

    I agree with this to a certain extent (I think its good to keep this in mind when you're at work for example) however, I also think that some people can actually get more things done this way. I remember when I was in college multitasking was perfect for me, when I would get bored with one subject I would study the next and so on, so that I was never really behind in any of them. So its all in your personality, some people never really learn how to multi-task, like a boss I had once who could never ever remember to do anything and when she did would do it half-ass. The character Sally reminded me of her. Good post though.

    Report Abuse
  • Donna's Avatar
    Posted by Donna Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:09am PDT

    I never multitask at home. When I sew, I sew; when I read, I read; when I clean, I clean and etc. Not only am I very functional, but I am also very efficient. However, multifunctioning is expected at work. I literally run my rear-end off at work, doing too many things at work. It is mentally, physically and emotionally exhausting.

    I think that the high-paid managers of these companies should read this book. They actually view the stress they are creating by over-tasking their workers, as getting their money's worth out of us--Maybe not.

    Dayra I understand about getting bored with something, and then putting it down to do something else, but that really isn't multi-tasking. It was your choice to put it down to do something else. That means that you put it down at a good stopping place, and you know where to pick it up at, when you get back to it. When you are right in the middle of something, and you have to stop, answer the phone or a question, of begin a second or third task--when you HAVE to, and then collect your thoughts to get back to the first task and finish it before a deadline. It it keeps up all day long--that is what employers mean by multi-tasking. Your brain gets fried fast--and invariably things get messed up or forgotten.

    Report Abuse
  • Susan's Avatar
    Posted by Susan Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:27am PDT

    I've always admitted that I can't and won't multi-task. I'd rather do one thing at a time and do it well. Some people are better at it. I don't know if it is a good thing or not.

    Report Abuse
  • Jett's Avatar
    Posted by Jett Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:36am PDT

    No, because I multitask too! :) I can't offer any help at avoiding it, other than to only multi-task with things that can safely be done at the same time.

    What you're describing doesn't sound like multitasking, because you’re not actually doing all those things at the same time. To me, multi-tasking is listing to a French CD while driving home from work, reading a book while waiting in line for a prescription at CVS, calling a friend while on your morning walk, or making the bed while talking on the phone to the credit card company — you know, actually accomplishing two things at the same time. What you’re describing sounds more like absent-mindedness or zoning out...or just plain boredom. Then again, maybe you’re trying to multi-task two things that can’t be done at the same time, which, again, is not really multitasking. Obviously reading a book and talking on the phone cannot be done at the same time.

    I think multi-tasking is good and needed and efficient, if you do it right.

    The following is an example of multitasking that can work:

    To-do list:

    Call mom to cancel dinner

    Call Chase to check on refund

    Look up recipe for dinner online

    Put away dishes

    Make dinner

    Practice choir music

    Turn on the computer. While it's booting, run to kitchen and put away dishes. Call Chase. While waiting for automated system to hook you up to someone living, look for recipes online. Print one out. Talk to Chase customer service to check on refund. Then call Mom and talk to her while you go to kitchen and pull out ingredients for dinner. Hang up phone, turn on CD of choir music you need to learn and listen while preparing dinner. That's multitasking.

    Report Abuse
  • anuushu's Avatar
    Posted by anuushu Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:53am PDT

    Multi Tasking usually doesn't get you anywhere - especially in business. It's always better to take your time and crank out quality rather than quantity.

    Report Abuse
  • Jett's Avatar
    Posted by Jett Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:23pm PDT

    Here's another example: Walking on treadmill while watching your favorite TV show — killing two birds with one stone.

    Report Abuse
  • shannonp's Avatar
    Posted by shannonp Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:06pm PDT

    Multi-tasking gets such a bad rap. I multi-task everyday because I have ADD and cannot do just one thing at a time. If you do several things at once that are related, you can accomplish alot!

    Report Abuse
  • Ms. Science's Avatar
    Posted by Ms. Science Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:07pm PDT

    I teach high school science. My students think they can multi-task better than anyone. To a point I beleive they can. However, they are not mastering their content nor getting as much out of homework as in years gone by. I beleive when something is difficult it requires one to focus on that one thing. Maybe take a break but do the difficult work without distractions.

    Report Abuse
  • Teki's Avatar
    Posted by Teki Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:45pm PDT

    I agree with Gracious. It's the employer's way of getting the most productivity out of the "little people". What they fail to understand is that quantity doesn't equal quality. In fact it does cause mistakes, burn out and survival mode which is basically just looking busy.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 17

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Updates Chatter on Shine…

manage your life byte

from Target

All kinds of wonderful. Gifts, solutions and savings all in one place. Find every merry solution at Target.