Manage Your Life

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Where have all the sick days gone?

One in six workers say they or a family member have been fired, suspended, punished or threatened by an employer due to illness.

More than three-quarters of workers polled in a national survey view paid sick days as a basic right of employment that should be guaranteed by the government. The survey was conducted by the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago and funded by the Public Welfare Foundation in Washington , DC .

Having paid sick days was seen as "very important" by 77 percent of those surveyed and 86 percent think that employers should be required by law to provide them. Respondents ranked paid sick days on a par with a minimum wage, overtime pay, and family and medical leave, and considered it more important than maximum hour limits and the right to join a union. At least 80 percent rated paid sick days highly as a basic worker's right and a basic workplace standard.

The strong support for paid sick days crosses all political and demographic lines and includes approval of pro-rated paid sick leave for part-time workers. The new survey also finds that workers without paid sick days are significantly more likely than those with paid sick days to report to work when they are contagious.

The survey also found that people are substantially more likely to vote for a candidate who supports paid sick days for all workers. Forty-six percent of those surveyed say they are more likely to vote for a candidate who supports paid sick days, while only 10 percent would be less likely to do so.

"Supporting paid sick days is a plus for political candidates," concluded Dr. Tom W. Smith, a Senior Fellow at the National Opinion Research Center and director of the survey. "Both before and after hearing arguments for and against paid sick days, voters indicate they are more likely to vote for a candidate who backed this requirement."

More than 40 percent of private sector workers, and 75 percent of low-wage workers, lack paid sick days. San Francisco and Washington , DC are the only jurisdictions with paid sick day laws in place, although a dozen states considered legislation this year and the issue will be on the ballot in Milwaukee and Ohio in November. It is expected to be taken up in more states next year, and at the federal level Congress is considering the Healthy Families Act, which would provide seven paid sick days annually to workers in businesses with 15 or more employees.

Other survey findings demonstrate why paid sick days are important. According to the survey:

    * One of six workers reported that he/she or a family member had been fired, suspended, punished, or threatened with being fired for taking time off due to personal illness or to care for a sick child or other relative.
    * 68 percent of workers without paid sick days reported going to work with the flu or some other contagious illness, compared to 53 percent of workers who received paid sick days.

Survey respondents rated concern about sick employees spreading diseases at work as the most convincing argument for paid sick days legislation.

"The lack of paid sick days has real consequences for Americans forced to choose between losing a day's pay or going to work sick," said Deborah Leff, president of the Public Welfare Foundation. It's difficult for employees to be productive when they are not well. They also expose co-workers and customers to illness. Providing paid sick day, which this survey shows is favored by the vast majority of Americans, is a simple matter of good employer practice and good public health."

"Across all socio-demographic groups, majorities endorse paid sick days as a fundamental workplace necessity that employers should be required to provide. The lack of paid sick days is a concern to those lacking coverage and is associated with dissatisfaction with one's job," survey director Tom W. Smith added. Support runs strongest among women, African-Americans, Hispanics, and lower-income workers.

At least 70 percent of respondents favor requiring both small and large businesses to provide paid sick days and more than 80 percent also agree that part-time workers should receive sick days proportional to their working hours.

Read more about the survey at WorkingMother.com.

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 22
  • HOSSANA's Avatar
    Posted by HOSSANA Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:19am PDT

    hello, it is good to pay for the sick days and every other benefit as well.

    Report Abuse
  • Aurora's Avatar
    Posted by Aurora Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:24pm PDT

    what are sick days? i wouldn't know. at my job, you have to work whether your sick or not.

    Report Abuse
  • mommietoo's Avatar
    Posted by mommietoo Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:35pm PDT

    Sick day is where you call in to work, sick of course, and you still recieve full days pay. I have been in both situations, not having paid sick days at one job and accumulating 3 sick days per month at another job. There is a difference believe me. Being able to call in sick or take paid hrs because a child or myself is sick, and in other situations having to work with pink eye for instance. In the weeks to follow several people reported having pink eye. But because of the time of the month the next pay day fell on, being able to pay my rent was more important than infecting everyone. Its a tough decision to make when youre paid hourly, and dont have any other benefits. In that case going home sick would have meant just that, because I couldnt afford the co-pay for the dr.

    Report Abuse
  • Angela's Avatar
    Posted by Angela Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:24pm PDT

    Here again, countries that take care of their people also take care of their workforce. In nations where there is free health care, there are also paid sick days and more vacation time for workers. These same nations also have laws that force corporations to treat ALL of their workers fairly, so those that state, "if you make these laws, companies will just take their business to China" don't have a leg to stand on.

    Report Abuse
  • Jezabel's Avatar
    Posted by Jezabel Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:39am PDT

    It should be a basic right, up there with the 40 hour work week, for guarenteed sick days. When you are severly sick you cannot do your job properly, when you are contagious you can infect the entire company. At worse if you would in the food service industry you can easily cause the restaurant to be closed for a few days a large group of patrons suddenly get a presumed food born illness from an employee, and as we all know it doesn't take much for a stomach virus to be passed around.

    Come on US, its not the year 1908 anymore, lets not breed Bolshevicks, lets protect our hard working citizens AND consumers.

    Report Abuse
  • DeAnn's Avatar
    Posted by DeAnn Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:17am PDT

    Can you believe that in other countries with better healthcare systems and even in CHINA of all places, women are guaranteed PAID time after having a baby? Not just job protected leave without pay, but they can AFFORD to have food and rent money after having a baby. I had to go back to work 4 months after having my daugheter and it was hell. I was eventually fired for poor performance because I kept falling asleep at work and pumping breastmilk. But, I couldn't afford to lose the apartment because I was the breadwinner at the time, and the 6 weeks of leave after I was bedridden 2 weeks before I had her was enough of a hardship.

    Report Abuse
  • DeAnn's Avatar
    Posted by DeAnn Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:18am PDT

    Gah! 4 weeks*

    .

    Report Abuse
  • Girl With Kaleidoscope Eyes's Avatar
    Posted by Girl With Kaleidoscope Eyes Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:10am PDT

    Let me tell you, those Republican company executives don't give a cr@p if you or your kids are sick. They don't care if everyone in the office is sick, they can go hide elsewhere. They don't WANT to pay anyone to begin with, why would they volunteer to pay someone who isn't even working? These employers are taking more and more from workers as time goes on, and unless the government steps in it is going to get very ugly for all us working moms out there. Why not just give everyone two or so weeks of paid vacation time (but no "sick" time) to be used at the employee's discretion? With three kids I would be happy to give up "vacation" time to just stop being harrassed every time one of my kids gets sick. The workers with no kids would get just as much time off. But I suppose it is asking to much of these greedy corporate entities - sad, but we will have to force them to do the right thing.

    Report Abuse
  • SavvyChic's Avatar
    Posted by SavvyChic Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:59pm PDT

    my company told me to drive myself to the hospital while I had chest pain, told me I should be more flexible with my schedule when my mom was sick. My response, fire me and I sue...you want me to flex MY schedule...I will, through FMLA. Use the benefits against them as a weapon. It has kept me from being fireable altogether for the past 5.5 years...that and doing my job so well it squeaks gives them absolutely no ammunition against me...take that big corporation!

    Report Abuse
  • AmericanGirl97403's Avatar
    Posted by AmericanGirl97403 Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:45pm PDT

    What do Republican company execs have to do with it? They aren't even mentioned in the article...

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 22

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Updates Chatter on Shine…

manage your life byte

from Target

All kinds of wonderful. Gifts, solutions and savings all in one place. Find every merry solution at Target.