Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Talk about un-P.C.: HP “Touch” ad pulled after funding child molester Gary Glitter

Female First

Female First

We were loving the recent HP ad for its new touch-screen computers featuring Joan Jett’s
"Do You Wanna Touch Me (Oh Yeah)," but apparently the ad wizards overlooked one tiny detail amongst this seemingly awesome pairing: the song was written by glam-rock singer Gary Glitter, who was convicted of child molestation and child porn possession. So in effect, Glitter, a child molester fresh out of prison has earned $156,000 in royalties for his ad about… touching.

HP has since pulled the ad, but groups like ChildAbuse-watch.net are already outraged claiming the campaign "shows a distinct lack of sensitivity.”

While we’re kind of surprised that no executives caught this error along the way, the song really was so perfect for the commercial I remember taking note of it the first time I saw the ad. Are we going to start banning the use of artists who have committed a crime? Where should a line be drawn?

Watch the ad below and let us know what you think: are companies too concerned with being politically correct, or do you feel HP made the right move in pulling the ad? [Gawker]

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 40
  • ambi's Avatar
    Posted by ambi Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:45am PDT

    It's just a commerical, get over your selves.

    Report Abuse
  • skeme66's Avatar
    Posted by skeme66 Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:52pm PDT

    Of course they done the right thing pulling the ad. A child molester is a child molester. Regardless if they are famous they should be shunned for what they have done, that includes not using their material. With child abusers no good they've done can shine through that darkness they perpatrate, in my opinion. I believe we need to take a strong stance on all aspects of this issues.

    Report Abuse
  • joker's Avatar
    Posted by joker Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:14pm PDT

    hang the S.O.B. from a tall tree

    Report Abuse
  • whiteoakmiracle's Avatar
    Posted by whiteoakmiracle Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:00pm PDT

    Honestly, don't like the song. If a carpenter molests a child should no one ever live in a house he built? I agree with the concept but don't think its very practical!

    Report Abuse
  • G's Avatar
    Posted by G Fri Oct 31, 2008 8:09pm PDT

    I think the song has too much of a sexual meaning . It just does'nt seem right for the ad. I get the point but ,yeck! I also don't want it to benefit that b------ in any way.

    Report Abuse
  • Disgruntled's Avatar
    Posted by Disgruntled Sat Nov 1, 2008 7:29am PDT

    It kind of creeps me out knowing that Gary Glitter wrote that song. Eeeew! I didn't realize he had written it so I didn't originally find the ad offensive. However, if Gary Glitter gets royalties from it, I think it was good that they pulled it. Who wants to give more money to a pedophile? Yuck.

    Report Abuse
  • C.J.'s Avatar
    Posted by C.J. Sun Nov 2, 2008 6:53am PST

    BULL****, child molester do not desever to earn any money's.

    Report Abuse
  • Chris's Avatar
    Posted by Chris Sun Nov 2, 2008 8:37am PST

    So you just polished off a bag of Funions and you want to change songs. You use that greasy finger on the screen to scroll down to locate and play the song. Song plays and you have big greasy streak on your fancy new Touch pc. Then imagine all the other people at work (especially idiots) who walk up and start touching the screen after they have had their fingers who knows where. Smudges galore.

    Report Abuse
  • Carmelito's Avatar
    Posted by Carmelito Sun Nov 2, 2008 8:56am PST

    I don't think there is anything wrong with the song. Like many other comments, I agree that we shouldn't turn away from something just because it came from a molester. Using whiteoakmiracle's example, we'd have to stop sending our kids to school, and don't forget all the molesters you hear and read about in our churches! I completely agree with pulling the ad simply because it puts money in the dirtbag's pockets. With that kind of money, he can live like a king in a third world country. If/when he gets caught again I would bet that country may not be as forgiving and will deal with him very harshly.

    Report Abuse
  • Dianna D's Avatar
    Posted by Dianna D Sun Nov 2, 2008 10:04am PST

    I think they did the right thing for pulling the ad because if they didn't it would be a even bigger issue. I don't think HP meant to offend anyone and didn't put the two together because who wants to lose money???

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 40

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Health Byte

When you need to rehydrate, do you grab a Gatorade or automatically reach for a soda? We weigh the pros and cons of each drink.