Female First
"Do You Wanna Touch Me (Oh Yeah)," but apparently the ad wizards overlooked one tiny detail amongst this seemingly awesome pairing: the song was written by glam-rock singer Gary Glitter, who was convicted of child molestation and child porn possession. So in effect, Glitter, a child molester fresh out of prison has earned $156,000 in royalties for his ad about… touching.
HP has since pulled the ad, but groups like ChildAbuse-watch.net are already outraged claiming the campaign "shows a distinct lack of sensitivity.”
While we’re kind of surprised that no executives caught this error along the way, the song really was so perfect for the commercial I remember taking note of it the first time I saw the ad. Are we going to start banning the use of artists who have committed a crime? Where should a line be drawn?
Watch the ad below and let us know what you think: are companies too concerned with being politically correct, or do you feel HP made the right move in pulling the ad? [Gawker]
