Wow, this story is amazing to me. A thirteen-year-old girl in the
Netherlands is planning to spend two years sailing around the world
alone but is being blocked by social services who feel that A.) her
father is not acting in the way a concerned and cautious parent
should in allowing his daughter to go on such a perilous journey,
and B.) that she is not old enough to make such a huge and
certainly life changing decision on her own.
Here's the link to the story:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090828/ap_on_re_eu/eu_netherlands_young_sailor
I think it's great that she wants to do this and feel its sad
that they are so far blocking her attempts. The girl is a national
of Holland, but because she was born in New Zealand and her mother
is German, she is a citizen and national, respectively, of those
countries as well. She has determined to flee to New Zealand and
sail from there if Holland will not allow her to sail alone from
her home country.
Personally, I think she should do it.
Already an accomplished sailer, Laura Dekker sailed to England,
where she was detained by officials who called her father and told
him to help her sail home. I almost burst out laughing when I read
that though he did meet her in England, he let her sail home
alone!
This makes me wonder if adults really have the wrong idea about
children. With all this research and medical information we have
about the way teenagers' brains work and the idea that their
minds are not fully developed until they are 18 years old, do we
unjustly underestimate their potential? In centuries past boys
hardly older than 10 were sailing on ships, working as adults do
and getting along just fine. If Laura were a boy, would the Dutch
government be reacting the same way? I grant that a young girl
probably does face a lot greater danger than a boy does, and
that's just disgusting — but it's nonetheless true.
That's the way it is. Still, do you think she should be allowed
to sail around the world if she wants and is able (which it seems
she is), whether she departs from Holland or New Zealand? And, do
you think that teens are generally underestimated? A 13-year-old,
centuries ago, used to be allowed to marry and begin the trying
task of parenthood. Why should it be such a stretch of the
imagination that the same girl should be up to the task of sailing
around the world?
Just something else to consider: Laura was detained in England
after sailing solo across the English Channel. The current holder
of the World Record for youngest person to sail around the world is
a 17-year-old boy. When he was 14, he became the youngest person to
sail alone across the Atlantic. How come he can do it, at 14, but
she can't at 13? Is there that great a difference in brain
function between a 13-year-old girl and a 14-year-old boy? I
don't know his story, so I don't know if officials in his
country (England) initially tried to prevent him from sailing. Nor
do I know the story of Zac Sutherland from California, who made a
similar journey across the Atlantic at the age of 13. But why can
he do it and Laura can't?
Would you, as a parent, allow your child to make a landmark
journey, whether on land or by sea? Would you support your child in
achieving his or her dream, whatever it might be, assuming he or
she had the skill and experience to achieve it successfully?
Encouraging children to be heroes
- Let’s talk: Comment (0) | Blog
- Email to a Friend
- Print this Page
Syndication:
From the Community…
Be the first to comment on this post.
leave your comment
You must sign in to post a comment
