Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (left) takes the oath of office.
Bath-time basics: soap, water ... formaldehyde? A recent
study finds carcinogens in baby-care products, and New York's
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand responds with legislation to ensure that
products are safe. We caught up with the senator to find out what
she's doing to make bathtime safe again.
By Lexy Schmertz
Are we exposing our kids to harmful chemicals in the bathtub? Turns out that many common baby shampoos and bubble baths contain known carcinogens—formaldehyde and 1,4 dioxane, according to a recent study by the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics.
Even more shocking is that the same companies that tout their products as "gentle" and "pure" are not required by the Food and Drug Administration to list these harmful chemicals, because they aren't considered ingredients in the products, but rather contaminants that develop post-manufacturing. Common preservatives release formaldehyde over time, according to the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. And 1,4 dioxane is a by-product of a chemical-processing technique called ethoxylation, in which cosmetic ingredients are processed with ethylene oxide.
Related:
BPA-Free Baby Bottles
Related:
Autism and Vaccines
If you're outraged, you are not alone. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, the 42-year-old Democrat from New York and a mother of two, is taking action. She recently introduced the Safe Baby Products Act, which directs the FDA to investigate and regulate hazardous contaminants in personal-care products marketed to or used by children.
We caught up with the senator to find out what she's doing to make bathtime safe again.
Q: What is the Safe Baby Products Act trying to address?
A: The Safe Baby Products Act is common-sense legislation to make sure the FDA has the authority and resources to protect our children from harmful chemicals in baby products. I have two young kids at home, a 1-year-old named Henry and a 5-year-old named Theodore. And when I received the report from the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, I was quite alarmed because many of the products that were mentioned in their report are products that I've been using on my sons since they were born. So as a parent and a legislator, I want to ensure that we have the oversight and accountability that's necessary to keep our kids safe.
Related: Toys with Lead
Q: The report from the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics shows wide ranges in the levels of the two contaminants. Are low levels relatively safe?
A: What we have is evidence that these chemicals exist in these products, so the next step is to find out whether it can affect children who use these products normally. This is what we want the FDA to determine: It is very good at assessing whether food and drugs are safe, and it should be doing the same for baby products.
Q: Why shouldn't all personal-care products (not just baby products) be required to list or ban these contaminants as in other countries?
A: All products should be safe for use, which is why I'm working on a comprehensive bill with Senator Diane Feinstein (D-California). However, because of the unique vulnerability of infants and children to toxic chemicals in personal-care products, my focus right now is to make sure those products are safe.
Continue reading about toxic baby care products...
More from Cookie:
The New
Pregnancy Weight Gain Guidelines
Mom Confessions:
"I'm Drowning in Debt"
Lose the Baby Weight
Postpartum Depression
The 19
Best Strollers
