Parenting

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

The Benefits of Having a Baby in Your 40s

If you’re around age 40 and trying to get pregnant - take hope in the fact that women who have babies in their 40s have longer lives! The benefits of late motherhood are physical, social, and emotional.

I'm pushing 40, and am finally really ready to have a baby. In my 20s I didn't want kids, in my 30s I started to see the wonder and miracle of having babies, and now I'm hoping to be pregnant within the next month or two! Though that itself may be miraculous...

Having a Baby in Your 40s Equals a Longer Life

According to the University of Utah, women how have babies naturally in the 40s or 50s tend to live longer than other women (it may be different for women coping with infertility and using in vitro fertilization or other solutions for infertility).

“If women in your family give birth at older ages, you may well have a chance of living longer than you would otherwise,” says the study’s lead author, Ken Smith, a professor of family and consumer studies at the University of Utah. “If you have a female relative who had children after age 45, then there may be some genetic benefit in your family that will enhance your longevity.”

Heredity - far more than environmental factors - plays a role in prolonged fertility and longer lifespans.

Having a baby after age 45?! This study shows that women who had “late fertility” - a birth at age 45 or older - were 14 to 17% less likely to die during any year after age 50 than women who did not deliver a child after age 40. Smith says scientists believe genes account for up to 25% of differences in longevity.

Other studies found that late menopause also is associated with women having prolonged fertility and longevity. So the later your menopause is, the longer you may live! And the more chances you have to conceive a baby (especially important if you’re coping with unknown infertility, or are trying other ways to get pregnant).

To read the rest, go to The Benefits of Having a Baby in Your 40s .

Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 31
  • Joyce's Avatar
    Posted by Joyce Tue May 12, 2009 12:37pm PDT

    I think it is a bit short sighted to only consider the benefits from a mother's point of view when considering having a baby. Yes, while it may be the right time for you, it puts the baby in a considerably higher amount of risk of other birth defects or gestational diabetes. This is not to say that having a baby in your 40s is wrong-- with proper preparations such as folic acid and exercise, the outcome can be pushed in a more favorable direction. However, the fact of the matter is that having a baby when you're younger is always going to be better for the baby in the grand scheme of things. It would be wise to mention this point while listing all the benefits for the mother to paint a complete picture.

    A useful reference: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article567189.ece

    Report Abuse
  • Sunshine's Avatar
    Posted by Sunshine Tue May 12, 2009 12:52pm PDT

    This article was great. There are so many negative articles out there about having babies in your 40's, its nice to read something positive. Most of us know the risks, its nice to know the positive too. I am told constantly about the risks....I don't need to hear or read them any more. Thank you!!!

    Report Abuse
  • tina's Avatar
    Posted by tina Tue May 12, 2009 1:30pm PDT

    Yikes, no way! I would be heart broken if I didn't have my first by the time I'm 27. It is so important for me to be able to be a younger Mom. My best friend's parents didn't have her until they were in the 40s and she was emabarrased about them a lot because the age gap was so severe. I just cannot imagine pushing retirement as my first born is getting ready to graduate HS. I mean I'm 21 and my grandma is 67, it would be terrible to think my parents could be that old and me this age. You may live longer, but you will be in your child's life a shorter amount of time. I should have about 60 years of love with my parents... starting so late it'd be more like 40 years and will your child remember their grandparents?

    I do wish you the best of luck with your child, and I do truely believe that no one should have a baby until they are ready, I just think there are a lot more negatives than postives to becoming a parent so late....

    Report Abuse
  • Lucky's Avatar
    Posted by Lucky Tue May 12, 2009 5:43pm PDT

    I miscarried twice so when my beautiful baby arrived, I was 36 years old. Luckily for me, most of his peers also had older moms. So when he was pre-teen I was late forties. Experience and values change for the better (usually) as you mature, so I think it is a Big plus for children in many ways to have older parents. More financial stability is also a big factor. But in reality it is an Individual choice and a huge blessing at Any age. I wish you all the best.

    Report Abuse
  • Mysterious Gryphon's Avatar
    Posted by Mysterious Gryphon Tue May 12, 2009 7:35pm PDT

    Being a "young mom: is, frankly, a stupid, selfish decision. Sure, you have more years to spend with them - but you will be coming into parenthood with virtually no life experience to offer your kids, to say nothing of financial and emotional stability.

    Parents who are in their late thirties and forties when they have kids have lived their lives and are fully prepared in all senses to become parents. Thus, they are BETTER parents because of all they have been able to experience. They are able to offer considerably more of everything, especially time and love, because they are already established in life.

    Thank you, Shine, for publishing an article supporting this important truth.

    Report Abuse
  • DizzyEmu's Avatar
    Posted by DizzyEmu Wed May 13, 2009 12:49am PDT

    While the article was interesting, some of these comments are really off-track! Why are people debating whether it's better to be a "young" mother vs a "old" mother? Who cares?! The fact of the matter is that there is NO perfect age to become a parent. There are benefits to both age groups. The author was simply trying to point out a positive aspect to later parenthood. I really do not think she was implying that everyone should wait to have children until they are 40. Like anything, it works for some people and for others it doesn't. Some women do well (like Halle Berry for instance) while others can't even conceive at that age.

    Report Abuse
  • Laurie PK, Quips & Tips for Achieving Goals's Avatar
    Posted by Laurie PK, Quips & Tips for Achieving Goals Wed May 13, 2009 5:46am PDT

    Thanks for your comments -- and DizzyEmu, you're exactly right! Some women are happier waiting until later to have kids, while others want them earlier. But, not all women have the choice because of fertility issues, relationship issues, career choices, etc.

    And brwneyes, I appreciate your view from the child's perspective. Yes, late motherhood brings more risks, but many women in their 40s have perfectly healthy babies. Your comment also made me think that maybe a 12 year old wouldn't want a 52 year old mom! Too old? I think it depends on the energy level and lifestyle of the mom.

    Report Abuse
  • yaya's Avatar
    Posted by yaya Wed May 13, 2009 7:59am PDT

    mysterious gyphon-

    so not true! I hate it when people act like they know everything, I know from MY life experience that everything you said is NOT true in every case. Do not mistake your OPINION as an "important truth" geez people these days

    Report Abuse
  • Lois's Avatar
    Posted by Lois Wed May 13, 2009 8:49am PDT

    I had my son at 41, with no birth complications. He's healthy. I'm glad to see this article because from everything you read, you might as well be dead if you are 40 and TTC. I also got "the talk" from the OB. You know the one that says "You're old, and because of that here are all the terrible things that you or your child are at risk for."

    I know there's no perfect time for everyone to become a parent, but I can tell you now that I am a lot better off becoming one now than when I was younger. I have more patience, I don't feel cheated since I had plenty of time to shop, travel, go out, work longer hours etc. Plus my mortgage will be paid off in 8 years by the time he starts middle school so that also gives me options for going part time and volunteering to chaperone his activities.

    Report Abuse
  • ashley's Avatar
    Posted by ashley Wed May 13, 2009 9:09am PDT

    I absolutely agree with brwneyes1210. This article seems remarkably selfish, it only lists benefits for the mother, and there really aren't any for the child. Like this poster said, there are risks with having a child at this age, and they aren't exclusively complications.

    Also worth noting: My parents were in their very young 20s when I was born. I had a wonderful childhood, and now I am in my young 20s and my parents are still happy and healthy. My sister and I are very happy and healthy as well, completely loved the ages of our parents growing up. Of course, it is important that would-be parents are responsible and prepared, but when they are, I truly believe that having children while reasonably young has a lot of benefits for the child.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 31

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

parenting byte

Keep your family healthy without changing where you shop.  Healthy living costs less at Walmart.