Love + Sex

Saturday, September 6, 2008

Infuriating, bogus claim: HPV vaccine promotes sexual promiscuity

Getty Images

Getty Images


Although sometimes we here at Shine question certain studies (like you know, ones that say smart ladies can't have orgasms), this one is legitimate and very, very serious. The latest news is that HPV (or human papillomavirus) has now been linked to lung cancer, which is just one more organ in a long list of ones susceptible to cancer caused by this extremely common STD (it's primarily known to cause cervical cancer, but new findings also link it to penile, vulva, vaginal and anal cancers). HPV is so very common, in fact, that yet another well established study found that one in four teenage girls are infected with the disease, making it a substantial, life-threatening epidemic. According to the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, 20 million (20 MILLION) Americans have HPV, and 6.2 million become infected each year.

The wonderful news is that it can now be prevented. Last year, the FDA approved the Merck vaccination Gardasil which is now widely available. Unfortunately some conservative groups and activists say that vaccinating their sons and daughters against the dangerous, cancer-causing disease is tantamount to making condoms accessible to teens and encourages promiscuity. This is not only ludicrous, it strikes me as very possibly insane.

As far as I'm concerned, this vaccine is a no-brainer and should be administered alongside traditional ones for measles, influenza and Hep B, among others. Many diseases have thankfully been eradicated in the United States (smallpox, polio) due to widespread vaccinations, and until HPV becomes less pervasive, there should be no question about whether or not we protect our kids from it.

While some of the vaccine's opponents claim that vaccinating children and teens gives them a license to have sex (WTF!?), physicians and advocates say concerns about HPV's association with sex shouldn't trump the health issue at hand. In the words of OB/GYN and professor Dr. Lauren F. Streicher, who calls such associations irrelevant: "Anyone opposed to the vaccine doesn't understand it, or has an agenda. The vaccine is grounded in solid science."

I have to agree with her. I understand that some parents want to discourage premarital sex, and that is another issue entirely, but wake up and smell the statistics: Turns out, millions and millions of teens are having sex anyway, despite their parents' protests. More to the point, what parent wouldn't do whatever it takes to protect their child from harm?

And for the record, I do think teens should have access to condoms. Especially with all that HPV going around!!! Oh wait, a condom cannot totally prevent HPV. But a vaccine can.

See also: "Is chivalry dead?"; College Confessional: A case for Gardasil"; "Get lippy for HPV & AIDS awareness"; "Journey through having cervical cancer"; "The doctor is in: Do I tell him I have HPV?"
Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-10 of 90
  • LCP's Avatar
    Posted by LCP Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:44pm PDT

    Just my opinion and 2cents...I think is is wrong to say "it is a no-brainer and should be administered alongside traditional ones for measles, influenza and Hep B, among others." You cannot get HPV by being in the same room as someone or having someone just breathe in your direction. You get HPV through sexual intercourse...this should NOT be a standard traditional vaccine which would then be stating that EVERYONE, whether they have sexual intercourse or not...can get this virus. Not the case. It should be considered along side a consultation with your gyno doctor (who has to be the one to administer the vaccine) and/or your parent (not that it would always be the case).

    I do agree with you though in the case that the vaccine itself does not promote sexual promescuity. But consideration and discussion needs to be made with regards to the administering of the vaccine...not just a blanket "everyone should have it".

    Report Abuse
  • KittCatt's Avatar
    Posted by KittCatt Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:46pm PDT

    HPV is a virus that is transmitted through oral, anal, and vaginal sex; however, it is also transmitted skin to skin. While I can't say that everyone must have the vaccine, I do believe that everyone should research it and make an informed decision.

    Report Abuse
  • ernestine83171's Avatar
    Posted by ernestine83171 Thu May 1, 2008 6:10am PDT

    My 10 year old daughter got the HPV vaccine. Why, because as a mother I'll do what ever it takes to protect my child. As parents, if we see a danger to our children, it's our responsibility to protect them. My daughters pediatrician recommended she get the shot now, in the course of her other shots, so that she is protect early and not when she is more likely to be sexually active. I figure if we are forced to give our kids shots for chicken pox, then I will choose to protect my child against cancer (which is much more likely to be fatal if you get it) as well. My daughter did want to know why she was getting an extra shot, so the nurse explained all the types of cancer she was being protected against ---- even at nine (when she got the 1st shot) she decided that the bit of pain now was worth the protection in the future.

    Report Abuse
  • Erin Flaherty, Shine staff's Avatar
    Posted by Erin Flaherty, Shine staff Thu May 1, 2008 6:22am PDT

    I definitely agree that it is a parent's decision whether or not to vaccinate. But Ernestine, that is wonderful news. I think you've made a very wise decision! The thing I'd really like to convey in this post is awareness. Despite some ignorant claims, HPV is not just some STD contracted by teenage sex. Because it is so common, many husbands and wives and others in committed relationships have inadvertently infected one another as well. That's why it's become such a widespread epidemic. My heart really goes out to the millions of infected people who missed out on Gardasil and now it is too late for them. (Yearly paps are essential as early detection can help!)

    Report Abuse
  • allee's Avatar
    Posted by allee Thu May 1, 2008 6:44am PDT

    A few yrs back the schools system in our area said all children HAD to have the new chicken pox vaccine... I SAID NO. And signed a paper or two for the school. WHY? you ask? Just because the FDA said so does not mean I am going to jump on the bandwagon. I waited a few yrs, and after not seeing or hearing about reactions or anything bad happening, then they got the shot.....

    As for this new HPV vaccine, again I SAY NO!!!!!!!!! Really I say OH HE** F**** NO!!!!!!

    When in ten yrs it is shown that there are no adverse side effects, or bad happenings, I may reconsider. Just because this new drug was tested by god knows who, and approved by again god know who, DOES NOT mean I will jump on the badwagon. -purposely misspelled-...

    I love my girls, but long term I love them more...

    Report Abuse
  • threerovetos's Avatar
    Posted by threerovetos Thu May 1, 2008 6:47am PDT

    As a parent of 2 daughters ages 10 and 2 I am all for the Gardisil vaccine. My 10 year old is about to get her third and final Gardisil shot nest week. As soon as my 2 year old is old enough she will get this vaccine also. I watched my Dad and Grandfather die from cancer and I will do everything in my power to protect my girls from as many cancers as I can.

    I do not see this vaccine as promoting promiscuity. Teenagers are going to have sex if they want to regardless if they have or have not had the vaccine. It is a parents responsibility to make their teenager aware of the risks of having sex. Parents need to make their teens aware of the fact that this vaccine doesn't protect them from all STD'd and is not a form of birth control.

    Report Abuse
  • she with the little feet!!!!'s Avatar
    Posted by she with the little feet!!!! Thu May 1, 2008 6:50am PDT

    Wasn't the same group of conservatives claiming that abstinence-only based sex education would lower rates of teenage sexual activity?

    If nothing else can be learned from my generation (aka "The 'Just Say No Drug Campaign' kids") it should be that just trying to scare us and telling us not to do it does not mean that we will do just that.

    Yes, it is true that it is an STD - BUT it doesn't necessarily have to be contracted in a promiscuous (from the female standpoint) situation; one of my friends contracted it from her husband, with whom she first had any relations with on her wedding night. Husband had been forthright that she wasn't his first; he didn't know that he had it either (asymptomatic), until she was diagnosed.

    Would it still rankle as many people if it were formulated so that it could be given after having sexual contact? That would allow it to be postponed til we were no longer giving it to children. (And no, I am not against this vaccine in the least. I feel that using religious or moral indignation as a reason to NOT provide protection for a child down the road is not the best path.)

    Report Abuse
  • Beth's Avatar
    Posted by Beth Thu May 1, 2008 7:33am PDT

    I bet this can be passed on between children from their parents at birth as well. When I was a teenager, I had at least 3 friends who had pre-cancer cells in their uterus as well as problems with cysts. I had wondered why it was so common, and I'm glad they finally recognized it as a problem as well as found a solution. One of them has already battled through lukemia (sp?), and I just hope the others aren't as unlucky. I'm all for this vaccine and I wish they had found it earlier because it's hard hearing that your best friend might have to have a hysterectomy at age 20.

    Report Abuse
  • elissyann's Avatar
    Posted by elissyann Thu May 1, 2008 8:21am PDT

    Because kids won't have sex if they think they might get HPV that might lead to cancer later in life? ...uh huh

    Report Abuse
  • Tiffani E's Avatar
    Posted by Tiffani E Thu May 1, 2008 8:40am PDT

    Did the conservatives ever stop to think that THEY should inform their kids about safe sex and not having sex at a young age?? Then maybe the thought of thier kids going to the doctor (with their parent) wouldn't be such a big deal...and if they were in a situation where condoms may be handed out they wouldn't freak out and think they needed to run out and try it??? Get real, people. This is about PROTECTING our next generation from a possible life threatening disease. Pull your heads out and find a real issue to complain about.

    I will do anything to protect my child, I will also fill her with the knowledge she needs to make informed decisions about her life. That is what a parent does.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-10 of 90

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Love Byte

"Um, should I quit trimming my bikini landscape?"