Love + Sex

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

My Prize Winning Submission

In my post last week, Are the Good Ole Days Over, Fools and Sages spoke about submission - an act he is clearly not in favor of:

"Submission is the act, instance, or condition of submitting. Submit means to yield to the authority of another, to defer. You can check dictionary.com. And if this is what some people think marriage is all about, y'all can keep it-- because I don't think anybody should SUBMIT in a marriage. I think it's about compromising, not yielding to the authority or deferring to the power of one spouse. In a marriage, the man and the woman should be equally empowered to express their thoughts and needs and find a common ground on which to exist as a couple."

I agree with a some of Fool's points, but not all, as I don't think he showed the full meaning of the word "submit".

Take the last definition, also in Dictionary.com, which states: "Law: an agreement between parties involved in a dispute, to abide by the decision of an arbitrator or arbitrators."

I interpret this to mean as long as both parties are in agreement over the rules, then some submission from both partners in the relationship is in order. (Fool's even says as much himself.)

I'll even go so far to say that sometimes submission is in order simply to keep peace. (I'm curious if Fool might agree.) For example, I don't always agree with Rex's conservative stance on money. I would have a lot more vacations, and a remodeled kitchen, if he loosened up his financial belt.

Did I let my opinions be known - loudly? Sure. Did it cause a lot of friction? Absolutely. Did I become an insolent crankpot sometimes? That'd be a, "Yes Mam With Jalapeno Peppers on Top."

Last year, I gave in. I submitted. Why? Because Rex wasn't going to. I didn't want to live with anger between us. I weighed the better of two evils, and decided that my stance wasn't worth forsaking peace in our home.

The upshot of my actions is that Rex started submitting more, too. We've had more social events, outings and flexibility in childcare than we've ever had in the past, despite this not being his nature. And yet, he's seen how happy it makes me, just like I see how much happier he is with a budget that will take us through retirement (even if the old kitchen follows us there, too).

A final thought on submission is stated in Dictionary.com's #4: "Something that is submitted: An application."

For the purposes of my marriage, I am attempting to submit patience and forgiveness over stubbornness and upheaval. This might not win me any bonus points for the "all must be 50/50" crowd, but it's gained me a prizewinning relationship with someone I adore - faults, warts, and all.

Thoughts on this delicate subject? And thanks, Fools, for a great discussion jump-off as usual!


Posted by Andrea Frazer

Good Housekeeping
* For More Tips & Tricks You Can Count On: Subscribe to Good Housekeeping & Save!
* New Year's Day Brunch Ideas
* Do You Need a Makeover?
* De-Draft Your Home Today
* What's Your Hairstyle Personality?

Reprinted with Permission of Hearst Communications, Inc.
Syndication:

From the Community…

Comments 1-3 of 3
  • fiction's Avatar
    Posted by fiction Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:45am PDT

    "fight club"

    This is funny because I used once the dictionary too to defend my points of view in front of a person who told me that the title of my novelette is wrong. And I searched in dictionary trying to explain that the meaning is right and the answer was "so?" And after this I understood that it is not about meanings at all but about a skill to avoid meanings. The dictionary like an arbitrage was only a tool for that person. If dictionary give me right there is a "so?" and also another tool. Where are not remaining tools, there is still the "so?" witch express also a meaning.

    Talking about an arbitrage this reminds me about the box fights. There are several approaches for a challenger when the arbitrage it is the "so?" itself.

    * First possibility: to pass trough all the box fight with the certitude that he will lose, no matter if he wined most or even all reprises

    * The secondary possibility is: knock out. And in this secondary case, probably, just probably, the arbitrage itself will interfere in the middle each time to protect the champion itself in front of all possible challengers. In the mid while the arbitrage will say to all: "Patience too all. My dear challenger there is time. There always is time: 1, 2, 100, 1000, 2000, 3000, 9999... are you ready my dear champion to beat this challenger for the sake of all once and for all?" And in the end, if the champion resists, see the first possibility lol

    *Because the champion usually is strong enough: there is also a possibility for the champion to knock out the challenger. And in this case you will see how the arbitrage itself jumps on the back of the challenger, does not interfere at all, and usually the count is: "1 2 3 4"

    Speaking about the arbitrage.

    just lol

    Report Abuse
  • instrumentjamlord's Avatar
    Posted by instrumentjamlord Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:02am PDT

    It is awfully nice when both parties in a marriage start going out of their way to do things that make the other person happy.

    Or to avoid a fight, especially if it's something petty. I used to get annoyed by having the toothpaste tube all crushed up. It's hard to get the last bit out, and sometimes the tube breaks open from being crumpled and makes a mess. Yes, I know it's hopelessly petty, but by the same token if it's such a small thing it shouldn't be a big deal to change the behavior, right? Grumble...

    I eventually realized this was a fight that I wasn't going to win, and it wasn't like she was doing it to annoy me. So I gave up on being ticked over it, and said, "Well, that's just evidence that the woman I love has been here ahead of me." I guess that counts as submitting. Now there are three toothpaste-tube crushers in the house. Oh well. It's called "family." It's a lot better than the alternatives.

    Report Abuse
  • Stacey's Avatar
    Posted by Stacey Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:59pm PDT

    Nowadays, "submission" is an ugly word, unless it is used to describe how mealy-mouthed, wet-noodle husbands are supposed to behave towards their over-bearing wives who lead them around my the nose. Personally, I love being a woman, and I love being married to a MAN who is confident enough to fearlessly lead our family. Ours is a monarchy, in which I am the queen to my loving and wise king, who adores me. My "submitted" position is one of honor. I would take our monarchy any day over, say, a "communist" marriage: two selfish comrades fighting for "equality," or rather supremacy, over the other. No thanks. I'm a happy queen, and the more I yield to my king, the more he cares about making me happy.

    Report Abuse
Comments 1-3 of 3

leave your comment

You must sign in to post a comment

Sign In for personalized information

New User? Sign Up

Love Byte

Skip the multiple-choice quiz, and read up on if you're a mom, a nag, too clingy, or perfect in every way. Aren't we all?