Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Lily Allen is the new face of Chanel: Has the iconic label lost its class?

    Like many women, I grew up loving Chanel. Not that I could afford anything the label had to offer aside from a high-priced lipgloss, but I have fond memories of my mother dabbing on some Chanel No. 5 before going out with my dad. I viewed Jackie O. in her tweed suits as a style icon and longed for a handbag adorned with the double-Cs to call my own. I liked what Chanel represented and daydreamed about the lifestyle associated with the brand. Here in Manhattan, Chanel bags, sunglasses and ballet flats are in abundance, and if you're anything like me, you look at them in awe.



    When I got my first big promotion, I saved up and bought myself a present: a black quilted Chanel bag. I rationalized my expensive purchase by remembering how "classic" and "iconic" the item is in the fashion world, and insisting that I'd get loads of use out of it. Well, I still use it daily. But one little bit of fashion news I stumbled upon today has tainted my vision of Chanel just a smidge. And that is their choice of British singer Lily Allen as the face of their new handbag collection.



    When I think of Chanel I think of class, elegance and luxury. Women like Catherine Deneuve. Not pop stars like Lily Allen who are best known for nip slips, getting into fights, drinking too much and acting irresponsibly at parties. Oh, and she's always got a Chanel bag on her arm (though we doubt she's paid for them all). With shows like "The Hills" and "Gossip Girl" regularly featuring Chanel, a brand that was once considered the epitome of high-end chic seems to be appealing to a more mainstream market. Chanel has never been an attainable label, but an aspirational one. The only real reason to use a spokeswoman like Allen is because the company is pandering to a younger clientele. Designer Karl Lagerfeld said he cast her because, "she's fun." Ugh. And we thought the brand was slipping when it hired Keira Knightley.



    Here are some of the most memorable Chanel ads throughout the decades. Does Lily Allen's recent turn as the face of Chanel hold up the way these others do? I think not.

     

    82 comments

    • audi  •  2 years 8 months ago
      Because they're trying to keep Chanel from getting boring! Lily Allen is definitely an unexpected and unpredictable choice.
    • GG1000  •  2 years 10 months ago
      I disagree that she's a model. She's a celebrity (God knows why). When you use a model, he/she's supposed to just highlight the products. When you use a celebrity, the person brings his/her own image into the shot. Her image seems to consist of getting drunk in public, saying stunningly stupid stuff to reporters and swearing at inappropriate times, then insisting she's cool because she's "real" and bugger you if you don't like it. (Let's have some fake if that's what real is; yuck) Not my idea of "fun" but I guess Onkel Karl's the one signing the checks, so it's his business.
    • Rebekah  •  2 years 10 months ago
      Im not usually the one to call people out on content, but this article hits me as a bit snobbish. The Hills and Gossip Girl are very fashion forward shows, so it's only blatantly obvious Chanel would pop up. Do you even really know who Lily Allen is? Have you listened to a single song she's written? Heard her position on the fashion world vs. real woman? Sure she's royally messed up, but she's moved on from that, as have the rest of her fans, as well as the gossip mongerers. Your position on her character is completly irrelavent because it's all old news. She's on her way to bettering herself. She's worked very hard to get where she is today and has obviously earned the recognition of Karl Lagerfeld. What amazing things have you ever done, because writing a snarky verging on jealous column doesnt count.
    • W!LD CH!LD  •  2 years 10 months ago
      Talented singer and obviously a stunning face for Chanel! This blogger is pretty ridiculous...
    • A Yahoo! User  •  2 years 10 months ago
      Ouch, why would you say that the label lost it's class? I can see that Chanel might want to try to appeal to a younger crowd this way, but I don't think that it would make the label classless. Yes, Lily Allen is an odd choice, but she does have the same eccentric qualities Chanel has developed since Karl Lagerfeld has taken over.

      Joanna, I think you need to get a real job. This is just mean.
    • chelseyk  •  2 years 10 months ago
      if you know anything about lily allen, maybe LISTENED to her songs before judging her you would know that she is actually very talented and sings about very controversial issues. her song "f*ck you" is her showing her disliking for closed minded people. she is singing against racists and biggots. and her song "the fear" is about how materialistic society has become.
    • Beth  •  2 years 10 months ago
      "her song "the fear" is about how materialistic society has become"

      And I'm assuming by singing about it she's disapproving? So she does a spread for Chanel? LOL! Well, money makes the world go round, right?
    • Lindsay  •  2 years 10 months ago
      Okay Im sorry but looking through the pictures of "classy" women Chanel has used in the past and you picked Kate Moss?? To me she is the last in line. She smokes like a chimney, is crack head skinny and has been accused of doing drugs but you say she is classy?? Please! I think Lily Allen looks great in her picture, not that I know who she is exactly but who cares if Chanel is trying to attract a younger crowd good for them! It is still the classy brand its always been just rolling with the times.
    • J M  •  2 years 10 months ago
      I agree with the author. And I also agree that we must change with the times as a means of product survival. But I would not have used Lilly Allen. Maybe a french actress??? Audrey Tautou or Marion Cotillard would be good choices in my opinion.
    • Alee  •  2 years 10 months ago
      That's a beautiful photo of Lily Allen. I don't see the author's reasoning behind this article.
    • India J  •  2 years 10 months ago
      the photo of ms. allen is nice , but why her? i'm sure chanel could have chosen someone else, someone with class and beauty i was very happy when they finally chose nicole kidman a few years ago to be the new face of chanel 5. they could have chosen someone such as vanessa williams , she's came a long way from when she was miss america, they could have even chosen hallee berry , naomi watts. i think chanel just could have done a better job picking someone
    • HuneysuckleLuv  •  2 years 10 months ago
      I have to say I'm a tad surprised that Chanel chose Lily Allen, who is still a very young woman in my opinion. Chanel has always appealed to the very classy and seasoned WOMAN, not the trendy 20 year old.
      However, if Chanel is trying to broaden its horizons, then perhaps we'll see Brittany Spears holding a bottle of Chanel sometime soon....?
    • Zelda  •  2 years 10 months ago
      I love the photo of Lily Allen.It"s fun and classic with a twist.It"s time for change.
    • Jacci  •  2 years 10 months ago
      I think Lilly's shoot actually brought the class back in comparison to the previous Kira and Kate shoots, so I have no idea what you are talking about.
    • Beth  •  2 years 10 months ago
      I get what the authors saying. Chanel was upscale and exclusive, something to envy and strive for. It represented success, class and style.

      Now, it's everywhere and on some pretty average and some might say tacky people.

      It's disappointing. I completely understand.
    • brown  •  2 years 10 months ago
      I like Lily Allen but as far as making her the new face for Chanel, that seems questionable to me. It seems as though they could have picked someone better. And all this Kate Moss bashing, please. Kate got into a bad situation where someone took private pics of her doing something that Lily Allen openly admits to doing. Simply put: Kate got caught. Bummer. At least she doesn't purposely broadcast her drug use to those who will listen.
    • Destiny  •  2 years 10 months ago
      To me this article comes off as very snobby, nobody in life is perfect and who are you to judge a person's past or present actions. I think its smart that Chanel is marketing to a wider range of people, and not just to who you think deserves to buy it and wear it.
    • slam  •  2 years 10 months ago
      You can dress someone up and make them "look" classy. That doesn't mean they are. We've gotten so far and away from any sense of social responsibility for one's actions in their personal life, which is the point I think the author was trying to make. This girl acts trashy, but is the face of what was once the epitome of a classy lady--not just looking the part but actually living it. It's almost as if celebrities are celebrated for how badly they behave in public (and private)--not very good role models.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  2 years 10 months ago
      What about Kate Moss? Hasn't she been in her fair share of trouble? Is she really the best role model?
    • starfedra  •  2 years 10 months ago
      I am sure it was a very conscious and thought thru decision, Karl Lagerfeld might have had an input but there are a lot of people involved in picking a new face, Chanel has a whole team of PR and marketing for sure and would not take a step without doing research and weighing the pros and cons, after all it is a business. I still think Chanel as iconic, just go to the store and the cheapest handbag you will find is $2,000 and up, I just was there this weekend and I love to go and see what's new, I grew up admiring all about Chanel and was ecstatic the first time I bought one, so them having Lilly Allen has not tarnished their image for me.

    Join us on Pinterest

    DAILY SHOT VIDEO

    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.