Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Was Gabourey Sidibe's skin lightened for the cover of ELLE?

    Getty ImagesGetty ImagesIn the world of American fashion magazines, women of color have notoriously been underrepresented, pretty much since the birth of print. Ditto the plus-size population, who go almost entirely absent from the pages of big-name publications, as if they don't exist. So it was a boon for both groups this summer when ELLE magazine announced that full-figured African-American actress Gabourey Sidibe would grace the cover of its 25th anniversary issue.

    For its special October edition, ELLE produced four separate covers, each one meant to celebrate a different mid-20's female star--in addition to Sidibe, 27, it included actresses Amanda Seyfried and Megan Fox and reality star/fashion entrepreneur Lauren Conrad. But here's where things got tricky:

    While each of the other three (all oft-used, not to mention skinny and Caucasian) cover girls are shown off in full-body glamour shots wearing stylish clothes, Sidibe is cropped at the mid-chest, with a swath of ruched green fabric hiding her curvy frame. Plus, her skin appears to be lighter than in most photos of the actress we've seen, which has stirred reactions on the Web.

    Gabourey hits on Gerard Butler at Oscars

    This is the first big fashion magazine cover for Sidibe, who became famous last year after an Oscar-nominated turn as an abused teen in the Oprah-backed film "Precious." Since then, she's received raves for her appearance on "Saturday Night Live" and a new role in the Showtime drama "The Big C." Similar claims about skin lightening were made in 2008 about the possible whitening of Beyonce's face for a L'Oréal Paris ad and in 2009 for an ad with Indian actress Freida Pinto.

    Magazine explains retouched Kelly Clarkson cover

    For their part, the folks at ELLE deny any dramatic lightening or retouching of their cover girl. They sent us the following statement via email: "Nothing out of the ordinary was done. We have four separate covers this month and Gabby's cover was not retouched any more or less than the others. We had 25 cover-worthy subjects in our portfolio and we chose Gabby because of who she is. We shot this as a story of exuberant young women changing the world. If you take a look at the portfolio, each of the women were shot in different ways and for different reasons."

    UPDATE: On September 16 the actor's representative responded to the Elle controversy by saying, "Gabourey is absolutely thrilled to be on the cover of the magazine's 25th anniversary issue."

    Hmmm. The images are above. You be the judge.

    Source: Colorlines, The Week
    Like this story? Follow me on Twitter!

    Other popular stories on Yahoo!:
    Jeopardy' record shattered by student
    Oprah's generous gift results in hefty bill
    Video: Angelina and Johnny Depp's movie kiss

     

    5,251 comments

    • A Yahoo! User  •  1 year 4 months ago
      It is possible that they lightened her skin but as a woman of color I also know that our skin tone changes during winter months. When I am out the sun for a few months I get lighter and then much darker in the summer. I do think think that they were "hiding" her body, but at the same time as a plus sized girl myself I would want the best most flattering shots and if that means you have to omit my rolls LOL so be it.
    • Silvia M.  •  1 year 4 months ago
      It's DEFINITELY the lighting. But, I think she looks beautiful on this cover. To compare her to jokes like Lauren Conrad and Megan fox, who have done nothing but make total fools of themselves, is insanely shallow AND offensive to women of color.
    • dr  •  1 year 8 months ago
      She uh beutiful blacks woman why iz dey hatein!!! she way finner den uh white gull. she aint fat, she juss thicks yo.
    • Janet B  •  1 year 8 months ago
      People are not admiring her for being morbidly obese. People are admiring her for still having dreams and going after them. Should she stay at home and do nothing because she is overweight? No. That is why she is a role model. Yes, she has to lose a lot of weight, but she is indeed a role model for those of us who have been made to feel we should stay home and in the dark because we are not thin. It is easier to lose weight when one is overweight than to become a good-hearted person when one is mean and ugly like some of you are. Being mean is a horrible, horrible trait. I imagine she is in a much happier place in life than most of you mean people. I absolutely think she should lose weight, but I also think she has every right to be on the cover.
    • hollander  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Easier than lightening her body, that is for sure. Will she also be a "plus size" mode. Good grief, let us not celebrate morbid obesity.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  1 year 8 months ago
      I can't stand a LOT of this. Sidibe's relevant and funny and gorgeous and effervescent, etc. etc. etc. And she is an incredible actress. Which makes her perfect for a magazine cover. The lighting? The cropping? What? I think people are looking for issues, here. It's a non-issue until people make it one. She's gorgeous, she deserves to be on the cover, I dig it, I'll buy Elle (probably even more now that I know we're on the same "page")... Some people should start looking into their own psyches before they start making issues (not of the magazine variety) out of non-issues. Ugh.
    • dbltrplx  •  1 year 8 months ago
      i am a photagrapher and that pic is photoshopped. i guarantee it. has nothing to do with the lighting. if it did the movie she was in would have shown the same results. in the movie she was black. in real life she is black. its just like everything else these days. b@llsh!t
    • L.T.  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Let's put the shoe on the other foot for a moment, shall we?

      1. What if the other three girls' photos were cropped, but Gabby's photo was not? I can hear it now... "How come the other girls got close-ups, but not Gabby? Elle is just trying to make Gabby look fat!" or "They don't think she's pretty enough for a close-up!"

      2. SO WHAT if the other three girls were white? If they were black and/or Asian and/or Latina, none of us Caucasians could (or would) say a word (because that would be racist, right?).

      3. What if Elle had decided AGAINST putting Gabby on the cover at all? Then what? It would probably be less of a debate.
    • Ginger  •  1 year 8 months ago
      This is totally absurd. She looks amazing on this cover and the people who have to dig all the time need to change their focus.
    • tee  •  1 year 8 months ago
      You people kill me. Why get on here and put the girl down? If Elle chose to have her on the cover of their magazine because they feel like beauty isn't just reserved for a specific type of people, then so be it. Why would it bother any of you? And to say she belongs on the front of National Geographic is just downright mean and cruel...but of course, what should I expect from people who have nothing else to do besides sit behind a computer and throw insults at people based on how they look? Not much. Get a life, PLEASE.
    • Mommy of 3  •  1 year 8 months ago
      She's on the cover, she should be happy they chose her. Always a complaint I swear. Would they have preferred a full body shot where she just looks plain huge? I think they were being nice and courtious to her.
    • Eric  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Hogger!
    • Tara  •  1 year 8 months ago
      I think she looks lovely and I doubt they could have done a better job at making her look nice if you look at the cover her hair is lighter too!!! Give us a break, if she was white and her skin looked darker would this even be article worthy?
    • PDH  •  1 year 8 months ago
      They did a re-touch. Lights can make a difference but not that much of a difference. What bothers me is that Elle thought so low of the general public. They assumed people are racist and therefore, showing her true color was going to be a problem. Come on.
    • Bruiser  •  1 year 8 months ago
      maybe its also discriminating that the other three are slender and beautiful
    • Jason UU  •  1 year 8 months ago
      She is obese and unhealthy and too dark to be marketable. That is why they did the cover like this.

      They are trying to sell magazines.
    • Salamah  •  1 year 8 months ago
      There are some hateful people out there. STOP HATING!!!!!! Just because you are not a size 2 does not mean you are not beautiful. The issue of what is a healthy weight is separate from the issue of beauty. Not everyone thinks skinny chicks are the only females that have a right to be beautiful. She made the cover and I am happy for her. I am a little upset that they did not do a full body shot though.
    • R  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Whoever wrote this article should be laid off at once. They have too much time on their hands and should get a real job. You sound like the people who held a paper bag to the face of blacks and if their coloring was darker then the bag wouldn't use them. Grow up.
    • R  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Whoever wrote this article should be laid off at once. They have too much time on their hands and should get a real job. You sound like the people who held a paper bag to the face of blacks and if their coloring was darker then the bag wouldn't use them. Grow up.
    • K  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Maybe she requested that her whole body not be in the shot. As a photographer I would have to say my heavier clients do NOT like to show off their body and when they are showing more body we find much different poses than with the skinny girls. Why would they want an unflattering picture of her on a big magazine? And for the skin- My darker colored clients also look a lot lighter depending on what light source is used and how the images are shot. Stupid article if you ask me.

    Join us on Pinterest

    DAILY SHOT VIDEO

    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.