Is it ever OK to call someone fat -- to their face?

People know when they are overweight and know of the health risks.They do not need Martha Stewart or anyone else telling them so.It is just plain mean and rude. I've witnessed a person comment to a complete stranger about her weight;The person did not care about the overweight womans health nor the national average of obesity;nor did the persons appearance affect anyone in any way.There was just some unexplanable need for the insult;Perhaps it was a way to deal with their own issues and insecurities.I'ts different if you care about someones health;Then gently show concern.But not with insults!! This will only cause more damage in several ways to both parties.

Sorry Martha but allowing such to occur on your show is akin to saying to you " You are a felon aren't you" on your show.

I was also upset when Kathy Lee Gifford carried on on the morning show with Hoda about Tiger Woods while she has her husbands skeletons in her closet.

Some time we would just like to can the politically correct bull and just have some common sense... I'm sure everyone who is fat knows they are fat. To characterize a person on National TV means there person who would allow it has no Character.

Why is it necessary to say it at all people have eyes!

What it all comes down to, is " RESPECT." Something I'm sure Martha expects from the people that work with and for her as well as friends and fans.She has to learn to do unto others as she would have them do unto her.

I don't think that commenting to someone about their weight is acceptable. It is just rude. You don't know that person's circumstances, and it is just hurtful to bring up something that they obviously already know about. It's really not your business.

I don't like Martha, I think she is rude and obnoxious. I would never call anyone fat.

Yes, yes it IS OK! And here is WHY:

JAMA
Mon, February 15, 2010

Vol. 303 No. 6, February 10, 2010
JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Ass'n)


CLINICIAN'S CORNER
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding in Severely Obese Adolescents
A Randomized Trial

Paul E. O’Brien, MD, FRACS ; Susan M. Sawyer, MBBS, MD, FRACP ; Cheryl Laurie, RN, BHSc ; Wendy A. Brown, MBBS, PhD, FRACS ; Stewart Skinner, MBBS, PhD, FRACS ; Friederike Veit, MBBS, MD, FRACP ; Eldho Paul, MSc ; Paul R. Burton, MBBS, FRACS ; Melanie McGrice, BSc, M Nutr Diet ; Margaret Anderson, BHIM, Grad Dip HA ; John B. Dixon, MBBS, PhD, FRACGP

JAMA. 2010;303(6):519-526.

ABSTRACT

Adolescent obesity is a common and serious health problem affecting more than 5 million young people in the United States alone. Bariatric surgery is being evaluated as a possible treatment option. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (gastric banding) has the potential to provide a safe and effective treatment.

Objective To compare the outcomes of gastric banding with an optimal lifestyle program on adolescent obesity.

Design, Setting, and Patients A prospective, randomized controlled trial of 50 adolescents between 14 and 18 years with a body mass index (BMI) higher than 35, recruited from the Melbourne, Australia, community, assigned either to a supervised lifestyle intervention or to undergo gastric banding, and followed up for 2 years. The study was performed between May 2005 and September 2008.

Main Outcome Measures Weight loss. Secondary outcomes included change in metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, quality of life, and adverse outcomes.

Results Twenty-four of 25 patients in the gastric banding group and 18 of 25 in lifestyle group completed the study. Twenty-one (84%) in the gastric banding and 3 (12%) in the lifestyle groups lost more than 50% of excess weight, corrected for age. Overall, the mean changes in the gastric banding group were a weight loss of 34.6 kg (95% CI, 30.2-39.0), representing an excess weight loss of 78.8% (95% CI, 66.6%-91.0%), 12.7 BMI units (95% CI, 11.3-14.2), and a BMI z score change from 2.39 (95% CI, 2.05-2.73) to 1.32 (95% CI, 0.98-1.66). The mean losses in the lifestyle group were 3.0 kg (95% CI, 2.1-8.1), representing excess weight loss of 13.2% (95% CI, 2.6%-21.0%), 1.3 BMI units (95% CI, 0.4-2.9), and a BMI z score change from 2.41 (95% CI, 2.21-2.66) to 2.26 (95% CI, 1.91-2.43). At entry, 9 participants (36%) in the gastric banding group and 10 (40%) in the lifestyle group had the metabolic syndrome. At 24 months, none of the gastric banding group had the metabolic syndrome (P = .008; McNemar 2) compared with 4 of the 18 completers (22%) in the lifestyle group (P = .13). The gastric banding group experienced improved quality of life with no perioperative adverse events. However, 8 operations (33%) were required in 7 patients for revisional procedures either for proximal pouch dilatation or tubing injury during follow-up.

Conclusions Among obese adolescent participants, use of gastric banding compared with lifestyle intervention resulted in a greater percentage achieving a loss of 50% of excess weight, corrected for age. There were associated benefits to health and quality of life.

Trial Registration ANZCTR Identifier: 12605000160639

INTRODUCTION
Adolescent obesity is a serious health challenge globally affecting both high- and middle-income countries.1 More than 17.4%, or more than 5 million, adolescents in the United State were obese in 2004, an increase from 14.8% in 2000.2 It is associated with both immediate and late health effects.3-4 Type 2 diabetes in adolescents has increased more than 10-fold in prevalence over the last 2 decades.5 Diseases commonly associated with the metabolic syndrome, such as obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, dyslipidemia, polycystic ovary syndrome, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, were previously almost unknown in adolescence but are now commonplace,3-6 as are serious psychosocial disabilities.6-7 Life expectancy for obese adolescents is reduced.7-8

Systematic reviews of lifestyle programs addressing changes in diet, exercise, and behavior to promote weight loss have found mostly poor results.9 A recent Cochrane10 collaboration meta-analysis that included 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of lifestyle programs involving adolescents suggested that adolescents experienced modest weight reduction for up to 12 months and weight regain afterward. Methodological heterogeneity, inadequate sample size, and short-term follow-up reduced the quality of the studies precluding a calculation of an estimated mean effect.

Bariatric surgery is now extensively used for adults and is being evaluated for adolescents.11 The most common procedures are laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (gastric banding) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (gastric bypass) surgery. Randomized controlled trials involving adults have shown gastric banding to be more effective and cost-effective than optimal lifestyle treatment.12-14 Gastric banding has been proposed for treating obese adolescents.15 A systematic review of bariatric surgery—8 studies involving 352 adolescents who underwent gastric banding and 6 studies involving 131 adolescents who underwent gastric bypass—reported observational data, which by its nature precludes making definitive conclusions about whether adolescents would benefit from bariatric surgery.15 Thus, a need exists for appropriately controlled RCTs to investigate whether surgical procedures would benefit adolescents.11, 16

We hypothesized that gastric banding would induce more weight loss and would provide greater health benefits and better improvement in the quality of life of obese adolescents than the optimal application of the currently available lifestyle approaches. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial in a group of severely obese adolescences. The trial was conducted between May 2005 and September 2008 in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were recruited from the community through newspaper advertisements. Eligibility criteria included age between 14 and 18 years; body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) greater than 35; identifiable medical complications such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, asthma, back pain; physical limitations such as an inability to play a sport, difficulties with activities of daily living; or psychosocial difficulties such as isolation or low self-esteem, subject to bullying that stems from obesity and evidence of attempts to lose weight by lifestyle means for more than 3 years. Participants and their parents were informed of the 2 study groups and consented to randomization to either treatment program. We excluded 3 applicants with intellectual disability and 1 with Prader Willi syndrome.

Consultations and adjustments of the gastric banding were carried out at a community clinic dedicated to obesity management or at a special clinic at the Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital. Gastric banding procedures were conducted at a private hospital. Patients did not pay any medical costs. The study was approved by the human ethics committees of Monash University, the Royal Children's Hospital, and the Avenue Hospital, in accordance with the guidelines of the National Health and Medical Research Council of 1999, as revised in 2007 (available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e35syn.htm).

Assessment, Initial Program, and Randomization

At initial telephone contact, potential participants and their families were invited to attend a patient information session followed by a clinical assessment by 2 physicians experienced in the management of obesity in adolescents. At this time, the nature of the study and the proposed management of the 2 study groups was carefully explained, and the suitability of the participant was clarified. Participants were asked to complete a 2-week food diary, record activity for 2 weeks using a pedometer, and complete several questionnaires. A second consultation occurred no less than 4 weeks later with a detailed clinical assessment, confirmation of satisfactory completion of the tasks, and further discussion of the trial methods. Clinical assessment included measurement of weight and height, neck, waist, and hip circumference; history of the weight disorder; and diet and weight loss efforts. Clinical features of comorbidities of obesity were sought. Laboratory analyses included fasting blood glucose, serum insulin, C-peptide, hemoglobin A1c, iron status, liver function tests, lipids, and thyroid function tests.

Potential participants undertook a 2-month program that involved best practice recommendations around eating and physical activity. At a third clinical appointment, the randomization process was again explained and the consent form was signed by the participant and the parent or guardian. After a cooling-off period of 7 days, the desire to enter the study was reconfirmed and randomization was performed using a computer-derived random allocation sequence to allow orderly admission into both programs. There was no stratification or blocking, and the study was not blinded.

Lifestyle Program

This program centered on reduced energy intake (individualized diet plans ranging between 800 and 2000 kcal/d, depending on age and weight status), increased activity (target of >10 000 steps per day on pedometer) with a structured exercise schedule of at least 30 minutes a day and behavioral modification. Compliance was monitored intermittently with food diaries and step counts. Consultation occurred approximately every 6 weeks throughout the 24-month study period by an adolescent physician and a dietitian or exercise consultant, the study nurse coordinator, and a sports medicine physician.

The participant's family was included in activities and education where appropriate. Exercise and activity recommendations included decrease of sedentary activities with a limit of 2-hour computer or television screen time, increase of formal exercise including bicycle riding, walking, and swimming plus informal individual and group activities. Group outings to fun parks, bike rides, hiking trips, walking, jogging, kickboxing, indoor bowling, and outdoor reunions were scheduled. A personal trainer was provided to each participant for a 6-week period. Parents were invited to participate in a specific educational program that included sports motivational talks, nutritional education, and discussions of the psychological aspects of adolescence.

Gastric Banding Program

Participants in the gastric banding group had the procedure performed within a month of randomization. The LAP-BAND Adjustable Gastric Banding system (Allergan, Irvine, California) was used in all cases. Detailed instructions on the requirements for correct eating and exercise after gastric banding were provided by discussion as well as in written form before the procedure. Eating rules centered on having 3 or fewer small (approximately 125 mL), protein-containing meals per day, eaten slowly (1 min/bite) and chewed well. Each participant was encouraged to undertake at least 30 minutes of formal exercise per day and to maintain a high level of activity through the day. Clinical reviews were conducted approximately every 6 weeks for 2 years by experienced medical staff. Adjustments to the volume of fluid in the band were conducted in the office, without use of x-ray imaging, based on weight loss, sense of satiety, and eating pattern and symptoms.17

Outcome Measures

The primary end point of the study was whether participants could lose 50% excess weight. We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth charts18 and defined excess weight as the weight above the 85th percentile of BMI for age and sex. We calculated the total weight loss (kg), percentage of total weight lost, percentage of excess weight lost, change in BMI, and BMI z score.19 BMI z scores are the number of standard deviations that a patient's BMI deviates from the reference mean BMI for that age group. Anthropometric measures included neck, waist, and hip circumference. Adjustment for change in height was made when appropriate. Secondary end points were health, quality of life, and adverse events resulting from treatment or from failure of compliance with the protocol. Health status was documented by clinical assessment and investigations at the initial assessment before randomization, and at 12 and 24 months after randomization.

We defined the metabolic syndrome by the age-specific adolescent criteria of Joliffe and Janssen20 linked to the Adult Treatment Panel III21 criteria. The definition of hypertension was adjusted for age.22 Insulin sensitivity and pancreatic β-cell function were measured to estimate risk of diabetes, and we used the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)23 incorporating computer-derived nonlinear solutions.24 HOMA correlates closely to insulin resistance as measured by euglycemic clamp.25 We used a HOMA insulin resistance value of 2.6 as the upper limit of normal.26 Adverse events included perioperative complications, revisional or other gastric banding procedures, protocol violations, adverse drug or treatment effects, hospitalizations, new disease diagnoses, and loss to follow-up.

We measured quality of life using the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ CF-50).27 This has been tested and standardized in more than 17 countries including Australia.28 The questionnaire was administered to each adolescent alone, prior to randomization, and at 2 years after entry. The CHQ CF-50 has 11 validated subscores.29 Each item was scored and transformed into 10 final subscores with values ranging from 0 to 100, and 1 subscore (change of health) with 5 levels.

Statistical Analysis

Sample Size. The study was powered assuming that, using an intention-to-treat analysis, more than 60% of patients of the gastric banding group would achieve an excess weight loss of more than 50% at 2 years30 and that less than 10% of the lifestyle group would achieve this weight loss. Using these expected proportions, we required 17 participants in each the study group to provide an 80% power and a 2-sided P value of .05. On the basis of a possible loss of 30% after randomization, 50 adolescents were recruited.

Data Analysis. We analyzed the weight change data according to the patient's randomly assigned program (intention-to-treat analysis) and used completer's analysis for the health and quality of life data. Demographic data were compared using the 2 test, independent sample t test, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate. Comparative outcomes of follow-up data of anthropometry, blood pressure, quality of life, and biochemistry were analyzed using the McNemar 2 test for categorical data and t test for paired samples for continuous data. All tests were 2-sided. The laboratory and questionnaire represent data provided by only those who completed. SPSS statistical software 16 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois) and SAS software version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina) were used for statistical analysis.31 No adjustments were made to account for multiple secondary outcome comparisons. A 2-tailed P value of less than .05 was considered significant.

Longitudinal data analysis was performed using SAS software to estimate weight measures allowing for missing data. This analysis was performed using the PROC MIXED procedure in SAS with each participant treated as a random effect. Main fixed effects of the treatment and time were fitted to the model with changes over time determined by an interaction between treatment and time. To facilitate specific comparisons, time was treated as a categorical variable. Age, sex, and baseline weight were considered as potential covariates, with baseline weight being the only variable found to be statistically significant. All observed data were considered for analysis, with the mixed-effects models assuming noninformative dropout such that the probability of dropout may depend on a participant's previous response but not on current or future responses.32

RESULTS
Study Participants

The flow of participants through each stage of the study is shown in Figure 1. Twenty-four of 25 participants in the gastric banding group and 18 of 25 in the lifestyle group completed the study. The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups are shown in Table 1. There were no statistically significant differences in demographics, anthropometric, clinical, or biochemical values except for higher systolic blood pressure and HOMA β-cell value in the lifestyle group (Table 1). The participants were at a mean of 99 BMI percentile (range, 97.9-99.9) according to growth charts.18 Extreme obesity (>99th percentile) was present in all but 4 participants. The participants showed physiological maturity with secondary sexual characteristics in all and most had completed bone growth. The mean increase in height during the 24-month study period was 1.4 cm. Recruitment began in May 2005. All patients were randomly assigned by August 2006. The final patient follow-up was completed in September 2008.

Weight Loss

The primary outcome of greater than 50% of excess weight loss was achieved by 21 of the 25 participants (84%) in the gastric banding group and 3 of 25 (12%) in the lifestyle group. The eFigure shows the weight loss, as change in BMI, percentage of total weight loss, and the BMI z score. At 2 years the gastric banding group had lost a mean of 34.6 kg (95% CI, 30.2-39.0). This represents an overall mean loss of 28.3% (95% CI, 24.9%-31.7%) total body weight, 78.8% (95% CI, 66.6%-91.0%) excess weight loss, and 12.7 BMI units (95% CI, 11.3-14.2). The BMI z score decreased from 2.39 to 1.32, a mean difference of 1.08 (95% CI, 0.86-1.31). The lifestyle group lost a mean 3.0 kg (95% CI, 2.1-8.1), which represents a mean 3.1% (95% CI, 0.7%-6.8%) total weight loss, 13.2% (95% CI, 2.6%-21.0%) excess weight loss, and 1.3 BMI units (95% CI, 0.4-2.9). The BMI z score for this group decreased from 2.41 to 2.26, a mean difference of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.05-0.39). The differences between groups was significant for all weight measures at 24 months (P < .001). All analyses are based on intention-to-treat model. Figure 2 shows the weight change of each participant that ranged from a loss of 81.4 kg to a weight gain of 17.0 kg.

Figure 2. Individual Weight Change at 2 Years
Each line segment indicates the weight change for each study participant and are ordered by baseline weight (highest to lowest). Baseline weight is indicated by a round data marker; final weight, by the opposite end of the line segment.

Markers of Increased Health Risk

At study entry, 19 of the 50 participants (38%) had the metabolic syndrome. Nine (36%) of these were in the gastric banding group and 10 (40%) in the lifestyle group. All participants had central obesity, 27 (54%) had hypertension, 22 (44%) had an abnormally low level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 13 (26%) had elevated triglyceride levels, and 1 had an elevated fasting blood glucose level. The values for these measures are shown for each group in Table 1. At 24 months, none of the 24 completers in the gastric banding group had the metabolic syndrome (P < .008; McNemar 2). Four of the 18 completers in the lifestyle group still had metabolic syndrome. The proportions with metabolic syndrome were different between groups at 24 months (P = .025, Fisher exact test).

HOMA insulin resistance, the reciprocal of HOMA insulin sensitivity percentage and an established estimate of insulin resistance,25 was abnormally high in 28 participants (56%) at study commencement, with a mean (SD) of 3.06 (1.5). After 2 years, the gastric banding group reduced this to 1.04 (0.6) with no abnormal values, while the lifestyle group reduced to 2.06 (1.3) with 11% still elevated at study completion. The improvement of insulin sensitivity in the gastric banding group (Table 2) was greater than in the lifestyle group (P < .001). β-Cell function or insulin secretion, as estimated by total HOMA β-cell function, was elevated at study entry in both groups and decreased in line with improved insulin sensitivity.


Clinical and Adverse Events

Gastric Banding Group. The gastric banding placement occurred without any complications during the perioperative period or within 30 days. The mean length of hospital stay was 26 hours (range, 23-32 hours). The gastric banding group had a mean of 20.4 visits (range, 10-31) during the 2-year follow-up and had 9.5 adjustments made to the volume of saline in the band (range, 5-18). Twelve participants (48%) experienced a total of 13 adverse events in the gastric banding group (Table 3), 8 of which required a revisional procedure among 7 patients (28%) during the 2-year period. Six proximal pouch dilatations caused symptoms of heartburn, reflux, or vomiting, and 2 needlestick injuries to tubing. Revision consisted of removal and replacement of the band or replacement of the access port. These procedures occurred without complication, and the length of stay was less than 24 hours. This subgroup had a mean (SD) weight loss of 83.3% (9.9%) of excess weight loss at 2 years, which did not differ from the 77.7 % (37%) excess weight loss among the rest of the members of the gastric banding group. One patient developed acute cholecystitis treated by cholecystectomy. Another patient, who had depression and trichotillomania at study entry, required hospital admission for depression at 8 months of follow-up, subsequent to parental divorce. There were 2 pregnancies. One ended at 6 weeks from spontaneous abortion, while the other delivered a healthy infant after completion of the study. There was 1 loss to follow-up.

Adverse Events

Lifestyle Group. Adolescents visited the adolescent physician, study dietitian, study nurse practitioner, or other physicians a mean 15.5 (range, 7-31) times. There was also a mean of 5 telephone consultations per patient and each participant had 6 sessions with a personal trainer. Eighteen adverse events occurred in 11 participants (44%; Table 3). Seven patients withdrew from the study (Figure 1). Six had gained weight at the time of withdrawal.

One patient had 8 hospital admissions for headache, depression, and tonsillitis. After multiple psychiatric assessments and 3 lumbar punctures, the diagnoses of bipolar disorder and benign intracranial hypertension were made just prior to completion of the study. One patient required cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis. There were 2 pregnancies. One had a termination of pregnancy, while the other delivered a healthy infant.

Quality of Life Measures

Eight of the subscores of the CHQ are shown in the eTable in which values are compared with community norms derived from Australian data.33 The subscores for behavioral, emotional, and physical limitations are not shown because these did not differ from community values at entry into the study and were not different within or between groups over the 2-year follow-up period. No significant differences existed in any measures between groups at the commencement of the study. At follow-up, the gastric banding group showed improvements in physical functioning, general health, self-esteem, family activities, and change in health. Both groups experienced significant improvement in general health. Both groups had 6 subscores below the community norm at commencement. At 2 years, members of the lifestyle group scored lower than the community norm for general behavior, general health, physical functioning, and self-esteem, whereas the gastric banding group remained below the community mean for general behavior and family cohesion but significantly higher for change in health and family activities. No changes occurred for either group in general behavior, mental health, or family cohesion during the study.


In this randomized controlled trial of treatment with the gastric banding procedure vs a lifestyle weight loss program for adolescents with severe obesity, weight measures and health status improved in both study groups. However, the extent of the weight loss was substantially greater for those in the gastric banding group, which also showed improved health with complete resolution of the metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance and quality of life as measured by the CHQ.

Despite a comprehensive, behaviorally focused intervention, those in the lifestyle group were not able to achieve substantial weight loss. Indeed, keeping adolescents and their parents involved in the trial for its 2-year duration proved challenging. The extent of weight loss in this group is consistent with published literature, although most studies have only 1 year of follow-up.13

In contrast, there was substantial weight loss in the gastric banding group. All but 1 lost more than 10% of their total body weight and 84% achieved more than 50% of excess weight loss. The effect was durable over the 2 years of follow-up (eFigure).

A key end point of the study was evidence of better current and future health. The study was not powered to enable evaluation of any single health problem but did demonstrate reduction of the risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes through measurement of the metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. Both became normal for all gastric banding participants. There was also an improvement in quality of life for the physical activity, self-esteem, and general health domains.

The gastric banding approach to weight loss is not a quick fix. For optimal effectiveness, it requires long-term supportive follow-up by trained health professionals. The need for revisional procedures for enlargement of the stomach above the band or injury to the tubing is intrinsic to the gastric banding procedure and was required in 28% of the patients in that treatment group. Although this incidence is within the range of other studies,34-35 it is higher than what has been reported in recent articles.36 Eating small meals slowly is central to avoiding this problem after the gastric banding procedure. This was repeatedly stressed during the study. For adolescents, additional education and supervision of eating may help reduce the need for revision. The need for a revisional procedure did not compromise the weight loss outcome or lead to additional adverse events. The incidence of pregnancies was higher than we anticipated and suggests sexual counseling may be appropriate in association with weight loss programs.37

There are several limitations of the study. We cannot be sure how well the participants reflect those of the general obese adolescent population in the community. The recruitment methods were used to minimize bias toward one or other treatment but may have drawn on a subset of the community attracted by the availability of free treatment. The study was powered to measure differences in weight outcomes rather than differences in other health measures or adverse events. We used an intention-to-treat analysis for the primary outcome of weight change but have used the completer's analysis for secondary outcomes. The 2-year duration of the study may not be sufficient to measure the durability of the gastric banding approach. However, previous experience with adults followed up for as many as 8 years30, 38 and adolescents followed up for as many as 5 years39 provides a reasonable expectation that the effect at 2 years will be durable.

It has been argued that adolescents with severe obesity need treatment during adolescence rather than deferring until adulthood.40 Severe obesity in adolescents is associated with multiple serious diseases, impaired quality of life, and an increased risk for later cardiovascular and other diseases that would reduce life expectancy.7, 41 This study confirms that lifestyle treatments can achieve weight loss and improvement in health for some. Diligent application of these approaches should remain the first option for obese adolescents.

However, if these measure fail, should gastric banding be considered for adolescents with severe obesity? Recent reviews16, 40 and health surveys of adolescent obesity11, 41 support the consideration of bariatric surgery during adolescence for those above the 99th percentile if nonsurgical approaches have failed. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding was selected as the bariatric surgical procedure of choice for this study because it is an effective procedure12 that is safer than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery42 and is adjustable and reversible. With a final outcome of 79% excess weight loss in the gastric banding group, the present study contributes data on the efficacy of 1 of the candidate bariatric options.15 Reversibility is important because better therapies are likely to become available during the active life of the adolescent.

In this study, gastric banding proved to be an effective intervention leading to a substantial and durable reduction in obesity and to better health. The adolescent and parents must understand the importance of careful adherence to recommended eating behaviors and of seeking early consultation if symptoms of reflux, heartburn, or vomiting occur. As importantly, they should be in a setting in which they can maintain contact with health professionals who understand the process of care. This study indicates that, in such a setting, the laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding process can achieve important improvements in weight, health, and quality of life in severely obese adolescents.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author: Paul E. O’Brien, MD, FRACS, Centre for Obesity Research and Education, Monash University Medical School, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, 3004, Australia (paul.obrien@med.monash.edu.au ).

Author Contributions: Dr O’Brien had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: O’Brien, Sawyer, Laurie, Dixon.

Acquisition of data: O’Brien, Sawyer, Laurie, Brown, Skinner, Veit, Burton, McGrice, Anderson, Dixon.

Analysis and interpretation of data: O’Brien, Sawyer, Brown, Paul, Burton, Anderson, Dixon.

Drafting of the manuscript: O’Brien, Sawyer, Burton.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: O’Brien, Sawyer, Laurie, Brown, Skinner, Veit, Paul, Burton, McGrice, Anderson, Dixon.

Statistical analysis: O’Brien, Paul, Burton.

Obtained funding: O’Brien, Sawyer, Dixon.

Administrative, technical, or material support: O’Brien, Sawyer, Laurie, Brown, Skinner, Veit, Burton, McGrice, Anderson, Dixon.

Study supervision: O’Brien, Sawyer, Dixon.

Financial Disclosures: Dr Dixon reported that he has a consultancy with Allergan and is a member of the Allergan diabetes advisory board, has consultancies with Bariatric Advantage, Scientific Intake, and SP Health Co; serves on the Optifast medical advisory board, the diabetes advisory board for Allergan Inc, and the medical advisory board for Bariatric Advantage; has served on speakers' bureaus for Abbott Australasia, Allergan Inc, Bariatric Advantage, Eli Lilly Australia, Merck Sharp & Dohme Australia, Nestle Australia, and Roche Products Australia. No other authors reported disclosures.

Funding/Support: The study was funded by grant NHMRC-GA05-384215 from the National Health and Medical Research Council. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands used in the study were provided by the manufacturer, Allergan. The Centre for Obesity Research and Education receives an unrestricted research support grant from Allergan.

Role of the Sponsor: NHMRC and Allergan had no role in the design or conduct of the study, collection or analysis of the data, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Contributions: We thank Michael Bailey, BSc, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Monash University, for his statistical analysis of the data, for which he received no compensation. We thank the patients who took part in the study.

Author Affiliations: Centre for Obesity Research and Education (Drs O’Brien, Brown, Skinner, Burton, and Dixon and Mss Laurie, McGrice, and Anderson); Obesity Research Unit, Department of General Practice (Dr Dixon); and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University (Mr Paul); Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital (Drs Sawyer and Veit); Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, and Murdoch Children's Research Institute (Dr Sawyer), Melbourne, Australia.



1. Ebbeling CB, Pawlak DB, Ludwig DS. Childhood obesity: public-health crisis, common sense cure. Lancet. 2002;360(9331):473-482. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA. 2006;295(13):1549-1555. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Freedman DS, Khan LK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Relationship of childhood obesity to coronary heart disease risk factors in adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 2001;108(3):712-718. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Deckelbaum RJ, Williams CL. Childhood obesity: the health issue. Obes Res. 2001;9(suppl 4):239S-243S. PUBMED
5. Rocchini AP. Childhood obesity and a diabetes epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(11):854-855. FREE FULL TEXT
6. Daniels SR, Arnett DK, Eckel RH; et al. Overweight in children and adolescents: pathophysiology, consequences, prevention, and treatment. Circulation. 2005;111(15):1999-2012. FREE FULL TEXT
7. Ludwig DS. Childhood obesity–the shape of things to come. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(23):2325-2327. FREE FULL TEXT
8. Olshansky SJ, Passaro DJ, Hershow RC; et al. A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(11):1138-1145. FREE FULL TEXT
9. Connelly JB, Duaso MJ, Butler G. A systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to prevent childhood obesity and overweight: a realistic synthesis of the evidence. Public Health. 2007;121(7):510-517. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
10. Oude Luttikhuis H, Baur L, Jansen H, Shrewsbury VA, O'Malley C, Stolk RP, Summerbell CD. Interventions for treating obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD001872. PUBMED
11. Inge TH, Xanthakos SA, Zeller MH. Bariatric surgery for pediatric extreme obesity: now or later? Int J Obes (Lond). 2007;31(1):1-14. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
12. O'Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C; et al. Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(9):625-633. FREE FULL TEXT
13. Dixon JB, O'Brien PE, Playfair J; et al. Adjustable gastric banding and conventional therapy for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299(3):316-323. FREE FULL TEXT
14. Keating CL, Dixon JB, Moodie ML; et al. Cost-effectiveness of surgically induced weight loss for the management of type 2 diabetes: modeled lifetime analysis. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(4):567-574. FREE FULL TEXT
15. Treadwell JR, Sun F, Schoelles K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of bariatric surgery for pediatric obesity. Ann Surg. 2008;248(5):763-776. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
16. Pratt J, Lenders CM, Dionne EA; et al. Best practice updates for pediatric/adolescent weight loss surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(5):901-910. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
17. Favretti F, O'Brien PE, Dixon JB. Patient management after LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg. 2002;184(6B):S38-S41. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
18. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM; et al. CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data. 2000;(314):1-27. PUBMED
19. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320(7244):1240-1243. FREE FULL TEXT
20. Jolliffe CJ, Janssen I. Development of age-specific adolescent metabolic syndrome criteria that are linked to the Adult Treatment Panel III and International Diabetes Federation criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(8):891-898. FREE FULL TEXT
21. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285(19):2486-2497. FREE FULL TEXT
22. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004;114(2 suppl 4th report):555-576. FREE FULL TEXT
23. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412-419. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
24. Levy JC, Matthews DR, Hermans MP. Correct homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) evaluation uses the computer program [letter]. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(12):2191-2192. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
25. Bonora E, Targher G, Alberiche M; et al. Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity: studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(1):57-63. ABSTRACT
26. Ascaso JF, Pardo S, Real JT, Lorente RI, Priego A, Carmena R. Diagnosing insulin resistance by simple quantitative methods in subjects with normal glucose metabolism. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(12):3320-3325. FREE FULL TEXT
27. Landgraf J, Abetz L, Ware JE. The CHQ User's Manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1996.
28. Landgraf JM, Maunsell E, Speechley KN; et al. Canadian-French, German and UK versions of the Child Health Questionnaire: methodology and preliminary item scaling results. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(5):433-445. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
29. Waters E, Salmon L, Wake M, Hesketh K, Wright M. The child health questionnaire in Australia: reliability, validity and population means. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000;24(2):207-210. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
30. O'Brien PE, Dixon JB, Brown W; et al. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (Lap-Band): a prospective study of medium-term effects on weight, health and quality of life. Obes Surg. 2002;12(5):652-660. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
31. SPSS for Windows [computer program]. Version 10.0.5. Chicago, Illinois, USA: SPSS. Inc; 1999.
32. Diggle P, Kenward M. Informative dropout in longitudinal data analysis. Appl Stat. 1994;43:49-93. FULL TEXT
33. Waters EB, Salmon LA, Wake M, Wright M, Hesketh KD. The health and well-being of adolescents: A school-based population study of the self-report child health questionnaire. J Adolesc Health. 2001;29(2):140-149. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
34. Allen JW. Laparoscopic gastric band complications. Med Clin North Am. 2007;91(3):485-497. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
35. Mittermair R, Aigner F, Obermuller S. High complication rate after Swedish adjustable gastric banding in younger patients < or =25 years. Obes Surg. 2009;19(4):446-450. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
36. Brown WA, Burton PR, Anderson M; et al. Symmetrical pouch dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: incidence and management. Obes Surg. 2008;18(9):1104-1108. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
37. Roehrig HR, Xanthakos SA, Sweeney J, Zeller MH, Inge TH. Pregnancy after gastric bypass surgery in adolescents. Obes Surg. 2007;17(7):873-877. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
38. O'Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston T, Dixon J. Systematic review of medium term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16(8):1032-1040. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
39. Fielding GA, Duncombe JE. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in severely obese adolescents. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1(4):399-405. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
40. Garcia VF. Adolescent bariatric surgery: treatment delayed may be treatment denied. Pediatrics. 2005;115(3):822-823. FREE FULL TEXT
41. Freedman DS, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. The relation of overweight to cardiovascular risk factors among children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 1999;103(6 Pt 1):1175-1182. FREE FULL TEXT
42. Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC; et al, Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium. Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):445-454. FREE FULL TEXT

RELATED ARTICLES

Surgical Treatment of Obesity in Adolescence
Edward H. Livingston
JAMA. 2010;303(6):559-560.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

Bariatric Surgery
Janet M. Torpy, Cassio Lynm, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2010;303(6):576.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Surgical Treatment of Obesity in Adolescence
Livingston
JAMA 2010;303:559-560.
FULL TEXT

-----------------------------------------------------------------

FAT KILLS FAT KILLS FAT KILLS FAT KILLS FAT KILLS FAT KILLS

He might have said, "Yes I am and you are a convicted felon, are you not?"

Audrey good for you for losing weight ,and now it's ok to talk down to people,maybe you should learn how to spell now...I'm a personal trainer and have never called someone fat,you being 5'2" are short and Martha looks like a tranny so save your high regard for your weight loss success and encourage don't discourage to make yourself feel even better about your weight loss accomplishment...People who are overweight use food as a cruthch and depressing them further will not help the matter it just makes you feel better since you can't get on the rides at Great Adventure(six flags)...Have a great day everyone...

I am always told that I am too thin.....funny thing is, when I weighed 300 pounds no one ever told me that I was fat.....

Also, forgot to say...I think it is perfectly fine to tell someone they are overweight. As long as you present it in a tactful way, and back it up with something encouraging. My fiance is 6'2" and 134 lbs. All the time he is harassed by people telling him he is "too skinny", or shouted horrible things at him while we walk down the street, once "fag", and "eat a cheeseburger!". Even one time at a bar, a girl walked up to him and asked him how much he weighed. Could you even imagine if it were reversed and he we obese? Why do people think its ok to harass slender people, but be so hush hush about fat people? And yes, I just said fat.

If people can shout these horrible things, and say to his face in a disgusted tone, "youre too skinny!" I dont see why others cant tell someone they are overweight. Again, dont be rude about it. And find a tactful way to say it, if you truly feel you must. I personally, dont say anything. About fat people, or slender people. I just dont see the need to make comments about it.

My nephew told me my ass was getting really big...and it was! That was a turning point and since then I am down about 60 pounds. Got 20 more to go to get to my healthy goal.

Don't get offended, get off your couch and move. Stop using a shovel instead of a fork.

Do you see any fat old people walking around? No, they are all dead. Think about what you deserve and it will become clear.

I have loved being round and healthy. Thirty years now. Yes, such a thing exists. My doctor gave me perfect scores. I love round and healthy people like the dance troupe where you have to be at least 200lbs and in good (muscle) shape. Or the man who runs marathons at 250 lbs. I know we need to believe that everyone who is round has a problem and should be ashamed. What I wonder is why we need to believe that? The diversity is so much more fun.

Martha's tactless moment remind us that there will always be those who surprise us with their total lack of tact in public situations. Visiting my in-laws a few years ago, they had a cocktail party at which one of their friends, having seemingly misplaced her list of acceptable conversation-starters, asked my wife and I directly, word for word: "So how come you two don't have kids yet?"

Rather than preach to her about the immense difference between personal family matters and acceptable topics for small talk, I sincerely wanted to reply, "Good question. You first; how come YOU don't have kids yet?" Unfortunately, with her being grotesquely overweight and over 60, there's no doubt her icebreaker would have been considered innocuous while I would have been seen as the rude one. I was in a lose-lose situation and I did nothing to deserve it.

Isn't there some sort of electroshock therapy we can do to these people that would stop them from humiliating others in public?

LOVE MARTHA MORE THAN EVER. YES I HAVE NOT WATCHED IN A WHILE I WATCH BONNIE. LETS GET REAL. WHY SENSITIVE? I LIVED A LIFE OF TOUGH. MOSTLY INFLUENCE BY DAD. WHY SO TOUGH I AM A WOMAN HERES WHY. I GAVE AND GAVE TAUGHT TO BE A GENTLE WOMAN EVEN PUT DOWN BY MOM ABOUT MY NERVES. SHE IS THE NERVY ONE. SHE IS IN GOOD COMPANY PLUMP CHUNKY BIG PERSONALITY DEPRESSED. NOW DAD AND HER ARE 75, AS AN ITALIAN AMERICAN I WOULD LOVE TO GET MY SMOOTH CURVES BACK I HAVE BY HEARTBREAK LAST YEAR JUST REGAINED POUNDS. IF LIFE IS SO HEARTBREAKING MUST YOU MAKE IT THAT WAY FOR ME. IF SOMEONE WANTS TO BE FREE LET THEM. NOT ENSLAVED. MY DAD WAS A GREAT POP MUSIC PRODUCER THEN MILITARY AND JACK OF 2OTHER TRADES. HE GAVE MY CONTRIBUTIONS TO TV AND FILMS AWAY TO HIS OTHER DAUGHTER. WHO MOM HAS BEEN IN TEARS OVER MANY YEARS AGO. NOW ITS BEEN MY SACRIFICE OVER THIER LIES. A WASTED LIFE. THE OTHER DAUGHTER, HER FAMILY WITH HOLLYWOOD PULL TOOK WHAT I OFFERED TO MAKE THAT FAMILY RICH. DAD IS A CLOSET OUTED CONFESSED BI-SEXUAL. BAGGAGE? SURE! MOM GETS TO LIVE IN THIER APARTMENT LIKE A HORDER. DAD IN THIER MASTER BEDROOM. THIS IS ONE DYSFUNCTIONAL ADULT FAMILY. I GAVE MY LIFE TO MENIAL JOBS SUPPORTING MYSELF IN MANY APARTMENTS NOW I PAID YEARS OF MORTGAGE WITHOUT MY NAME ON ANYTHING... HERE IS A CASE OF THROWING YOUR WEIGHT AROUND. LAZY COUSINS THAT NEVER FESSED UP ABOUT THE SISTER I THOUGHT WAS A NEIGHBOR FRIEND OF DADS BY THE SHAKING OF MOMS BODY RED FACE EPISODES IN BROOKLYN NEW YORK APT. BUILDING. TWO WOMEN ONE HUSBAND. ME ONE TEENAGER GETTING VERBAL ABUSE BECAUSE MOM WON'T TALK WITH ME ABOUT IT.
SURE THEY SEEM DISTURBED. YES I CAN'T BE PEACFUL WITHOUT A GREAT FLAT STOMACH. MY LIFE WENT TO SHAMS JUST LOVING MY CHAMPION CATS. A NEIGHBOR NOW IN PRISON FOR DRUGS. HER SISTER AND NEICE TRESPASSED ON MY PATIO INJECTING CATS WITH ??? THEY DIED. I WANTED THEM TO GO TO 20YRS OLD. I PLAYED THE OBEDIENT GAME. I ALWAYS HAD A FREE CAR THOUGH I PAID FOR RENT IN MANY PLACES. THIS PLACE WAS OWNED BY DAD. HIM AND HIS GLUTTONOUS HOBBY OF RESTARAUNTS FASTFOOD STOPS FOR HIS LIFE MAKING ME MOMS BUDDY SLAVE. LOOK A WRITERS LIFE NOT MUCH. THE ESTRANGED SISTER YES SHE IS THE ACTRESS ON MY CREATION I SUGGESTED HER GAVE HER A STAGE NAME BY FRIENDSHIP AND CREATED GREAT TV. NOT POSTED ON CREDITS FRONT NAMES THATS ALL PRODUCTION.... SCRIPTS ARE BROUGHT FORTH BY A HAWKER A SALESMAN WITH THE PRODUCT... I CASUALLY MET THIS GEORGE MARSHALL THE SISTERS STEP DAD MANAGER AND HAVE SEEN ALL MY TENDER TOUCHING HILARIOUS FILM TREATMENTS TURNED INTO MEGA HITS. WRITERS GET THE FIRST PAY AND THATS IT BUT I GOT FREE TRANSPORT HMMM???? MY BIG BUM WAS CONTENT. FOOLISLY. WITHOUT COPYWRIGHT. I GAVE UP. DON'T GIVE UP BE THIN. A NEW SCRIPT A NEW LIFE I HOPE. MY ANTISOCIAL PHONEY PARENTS ENJOYED THIER LIES BESTOWED UPON ME KEEPING MY FRIENDS FOR THIER OWN SECRETS PROBLEMS! NO MORE. GOOGLE DADS WORK PUBLIC DOMAIN VINNYCATALANO/STORY YAHOO MUSIC. TRY MINE AT giacalini/myspace

as an overweight person, it does irritate me when people point out the obvious. my weight harms no one but me and it is not up for discussion. i have had strangers make "helpful" comments to me over the years and my usual reply is something that will cut them just as deep.
i don't think obesity is a disability. i do not use a wheel chair or have a handicapped sticker for my car so i can park close to businesses. i work a job where i am on my feet 8-10 hours a day. i move! i do not eat cakes, candy, or drink soda. i am just a big person and i would appreciate it if people would just let me and others like me be. isn't there anything else going on in the world to talk about?
had i been on the show, i would have said "yes martha, i am overweight. and you, you are a single, lonely, bitter woman who happens to be a felon."

Look, the issue isn't whether or not the person is overweight. Trust me, we know what we are ... good or bad. The problem is that people use "fat" to describe a person's intellect. I can't tell you how many times I've heard the phrase, "oh he is just so fat" or "she's a fat pig" when weight has never been an issue. These things are said when a person annoys another. Then there are the fat jokes. Really? Are they really necessary? I heard a student going off about the funny thing he said about a girl in class and how she was a fat reindeer. It wasn't funny and yet the whole class erupted in laughter and the girl was nearly in tears.

See, there are two types of people that society hates - smokers and fat people. It's ok in society to speak against them; ostracize them; and judge unwarranted. You don't know WHY someone is obese. There are a million reasons, a million factors. I myself have been steadily growing in size. Diets haven't worked. My doctors have been stymied as to what the reasons were. No one could help. Finally the weight just got so bad that everyone was saying that I was lazy. Family members would tell me to get off the couch and do more. Coworkers wouldn't look me in the eye. Forget about trying to get a better job even though I was clearly more qualified than most. There was always that look. In other people's eyes, I was stupid, lazy, and incompetent. Obviously if I were smart, I could get a better handle on my weight.

And then I started only sleeping 20 minutes a night. I'd fall asleep in the oddest locations and I was so rundown. When I did a sleep study upon the urging of a new doctor, who'd given up hope about dieting, I found out that I not only had severe sleep apnea but I had narcolepsythat was ascerbated by the apnea. And this wasn't something I developed by being "fat". I'd had it since I was born. I've always had breathing issues. Back then they didn't know what it was.

But, for me, the light at the end of the tunnel is a little clearer now because I not only could sleep a full night but I dropped nearly 20# the first week ... without changing my diet or exercise. My doctor said, of course. Without the right levels of oxygen in the system, the body cannot chemically work properly. Now, I'm not where I need to be yet, but I'm working on it. My neurologist says that it will take years before I stop being so tired ... and every day gets better. I have more energy and I'm taking advantage of it. But it doesn't erase those years or even the current bias.

"Gaining weight along with much of the world’s population is neither shameful nor embarrassing." Nothing to be ashamed about when its a health problem. Yes, totally embarrassing when it's not. Shoveling massive quantities of food into yourself is not healthy and it's not a pretty sight. Sorry not to be p.c.

Blah I made what I thought was a really decent comment on this subject and I guess it didn't post for some reason?

A bit of a public setting to call someone out on their weight isn't it? It seems to me that if you were truly trying to help someone, you would do it in a private setting rather than one that might increase your ratings.