Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Romney on Birth Control Decision: It's Wrong for Obama in 2012, but Right for Romney in 2005

    As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney made a similar decision about religious organizations and contraception.As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney made a similar decision about religious organizations and contracept …Calling it "a direct attack on religious liberty," Mitt Romney's campaign criticized the Obama administration's decision to require religious hospitals and universities to provide birth control coverage in accordance with the Affordable Care Act, even if it goes against the employers' religious beliefs.

    But what the Republican presidential hopeful didn't mention was the fact that, as governor of Massachusetts in 2005, Romney required religious hospitals to do nearly the same thing.

    Back then, he vetoed a bill requiring all hospitals -- even Catholic ones -- to offer emergency contraception to rape victims. But when the Massachusetts state government overturned the veto, he switched sides on the issue, insisting that requiring religious hospitals provide the so-called morning-after pill was "the right thing."

    "I think it's, in my personal view, it's the right thing for hospitals to provide information and access to emergency contraception to anyone who is a victim of rape," he said at the time.

    Though Romney is currently running for president as a pro-life candidate, he ran as an abortion rights supporter during a 1994 campaign for U.S. Senate and again during the 2002 race for governor of Massachusetts, justifying his then pro-choice position with a personal story about his brother-in-law's sister, whom he said died during a botched illegal abortion in the 1960s.

    "It is since that time my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter, and you will not see me wavering on that," he said during an Oct. 25, 1994, debate with Senator Edward M. Kennedy.

    But, since then, he's done more than waver. He's switched sides entirely.

    In an email to the New York Times on Monday, Romney spokesperson Andrea Saul wrote that Romney considers it "wrong" to require religious employers, including hospitals and universities, to provide birth control, including emergency contraception, to anyone. "This is a direct attack on religious liberty," she wrote, "and will not stand in a Romney presidency."

    Romney has also pledged to end Title X, which funds family planning services including screenings for breast cancer and cervical cancer. Though Planned Parenthood receives funding through Title X, federal law states that the funds cannot be used to pay for abortion services.

    The other GOP presidential candidates take the birth control issue a step further:

    • Rick Santorum says that health insurance plans should not be required to cover birth control at all, and favors allowing states to decide whether to ban birth control completely; he also says that abortion should be banned completely, even in cases of rape and incest, believes that schools should not be allowed to teach students about contraception, and has voted for legislation that would penalize states where high numbers of illegitimate children are born. He supports a federal "personhood" amendment which would define life as beginning at conception.
    • Newt Gingrich also supports ending Title X, specifically in order to de-fund Planned Parenthood, and, like Santorum, says he would back a federal amendment defining life at conception. He also supported the Federal Abortion Ban, which would sentence doctors who perform certain types of abortion to two years in jail.
    • Ron Paul, a former obstetrician, opposes insurance coverage of all forms of birth control and has said that, as president, he would veto "all government family planning schemes," including Title X. Though he supports abortion rights when a woman's life is at risk, he opposes it in cases of rape and incest.


    The Obama administration's rule about religious employers and contraception is part of the Affordable Care Act, which states that health insurers must cover birth control costs without a co-payment and calls birth control a form of "preventative care" for women. Places of worship have always been exempt from this portion of the act, but many religious groups feel that it should apply to organizations that are affiliated with religion, like Catholic hospitals and religious universities, as well. These other organizations now have an extra year to comply with the new law, but are not exempt from it.

    Copyright © 2012 Yahoo Inc.




    Also on Shine:

    What's the most important political issue to you right now?
    5 Affordable Care Act myths debunked
    Should you have to pay for other people's birth control?

     

    60 comments

    • Natalie  •  Nashville, Tennessee  •  17 days ago
      These men are truly sick, they want to make birth control required, but allow states to decide to ban it (or just ban it all together huh? god), ban abortion (no matter what), punish illegitimate states and not teach about contraception?????? but you all want women who have been raped by their brother, father, cousin, uncle, etc. to have illegitimate incest rape babies and keep them?! Do we not realize that children born of incest usually develop certain diseases, related to the fact that the genes are sooo much alike from the two parents, that it causes recessive genes to become dominant (heart diseases, negative traits, mental issues, etc.) and can truly be harmful for the child and in adult life...plus, it's wrong...with so many people in our country (let alone in the world), we don't have the evolutionary needs to reproduce with family members of any kind, and I believe we are evolving out of that need completely. So, why condone the obviously damaging (truly to children and society) behavior instead of condoning acts that might create a more intelligent, healthier, happier human being? For example, make incest illegal if you have to, but advocate programs that bring appreciation to all our differences, maybe teach children about learning to accept people, especially in romantic relationships, rather than focusing solely on sex, sex, sex and then throw in condom at the end. I mean, come on, the government is the one who opened the floodgates for multicultural interaction and now, someone (or many someones) who wants to segregate families through incest tactics and taking illegitimate children is even allowed to stand on that podium and speak? I am appalled, seriously. This country and it's government, and it's people, we all need to wake up and figure out who we are, and defend that,and stop running down these useless rabbit trails made by idiot politicians who have been trained to do nothing but distract us.
    • Switchrat  •  Suwanee, Georgia  •  3 months ago
      If a fetus is considered a person, then I can sue my newborn baby for sexual assault. If any other individual causes that much damage to my ladyparts (especially against my will) they're going to jail for years. And if complications of an unwanted childbirth kill a woman, the fetus should be charged with murder. If you want a baby to be a person, it can go both ways.
    • jd2009  •  Tokyo, Japan  •  3 months ago
      Soooo let's get this straight.... Santorum does not want contraceptive education in schools and he wants to penalize states that have high rates of illegitimate children - Do these clowns not realize there is a cause and effect balance here?
    • Mr. Z  •  Houston, Texas  •  3 months ago
      Let's review - the teabaggers want to ban sex education, ban free condoms for teenagers, ban birth control pills, ban Constitutionally protected abortions, and punish states that have an increase in out of wedlock babies. Yet I haven't seen one of them talking about all of the unwanted babies they've adopted. They have firmly planted their craniums in their sphincters.
      • Harley 3 months ago
        I can talk about unwanted babies...if you don't want them, don't get pregnant.
      • LBC 3 months ago
        Exactly Mr. Z.
      • LBC 3 months ago
        Harley - how can you not get pregnant if you were never taught about how pregnancy happens and how to prevent it, and were never given the opportunity to get preventative contraceptives?
    • Tiffany  •  3 months ago
      This is joke right? am I being punked? if not then wow just wow, no one can be that stupid. I mean do you want all these teenagers to get pregnant just because they can't afford birth control because some #$%$ passed a law? I mean when I was that age birth control protected me from that and I am very very grateful. I have done everything I wanted to. If I would have gotten pregnant I would not be where I am today that's for sure.
      • James 3 months ago
        how about abstinence? works 100% of the time.
      • Tiffany 3 months ago
        That too but how likely are teenagers going to do that?
    • Julie  •  Carson City, Nevada  •  3 months ago
      If women can take birth control then we will just stop having sex with men! That'll teach you!
      • Julie 3 months ago
        opps Cant take
      • Fiffie 3 months ago
        YAY! just use good ol B.O.B
    • John  •  Vero Beach, Florida  •  3 months ago
      Republicans SAY that abstinence is the only real birth control. But they don't LIVE like that.
    • John  •  Vero Beach, Florida  •  3 months ago
      Conservative men just want to control women's bodies. It is simple.
    • pcs  •  3 months ago
      Did you all catch that part of the article where Santorum says he favors states being able to decide whether or not they will ban birth control???? That guy is wack!
    • AA  •  Austin, Texas  •  3 months ago
      It's funny how Stanton say's he wants to ban schools from teaching about contraception and then penalize states with a high number of illegitimate children. If you aren't teaching kids how to use contraception, of COURSE there's going to be a high number of illegitimate babies! I know that we're supposed to wait until we're "married" but now a days that stuff doesn't cut and while it's appalling that kids my age and younger are having sex, at least some are doing it while on birth control or with a condom. Take that away and there's going to be a big jump in teen pregnancies and illegitimate kids.
      • flutegirl 3 months ago
        Many studies have shown that abstinence is a more effective teaching method. Sure, there will be rebel kids, but if kids in general think they know about contraceptives (and of course they won't know every detail), they'll think they're more protected than they are and more of them will engage in sexual behavior.
      • Word Up 3 months ago
        where are these studies, flutegirl?
      • Ann 3 months ago
        Flutegirl is talking our of her rear; there are no such studies that come from any scientific peer reviewed source - they're all religious sources with skewed data. Our government has spent over $1.5 billion on abstinence-only education over the last 15 years, and yet the U.S. teenage pregnancy rates remain at the top of the list of developed countries. Aside from that, almost half of all teenagers are sexually active. What does that tell you?

        She's just saying what she wants to believe.
    • U.S. ARMY RETIRED 1971-91  •  Birmingham, Alabama  •  3 months ago
      Old Mitt talk about FLIP/ FLOP. I'LL SAY ANYTHING TO GET ELECTED!!!!!
    • U.S. ARMY RETIRED 1971-91  •  Birmingham, Alabama  •  3 months ago
      Sounds like were about to go back to the old ways. Women have no say If I'M Elected President. I'LL say anything to get Elected. And I'll not waver on that.
    • Carol K  •  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
      Wow, this must be a joke, right? Insurance companies just started covering birth control. How about they stop covering Viagra instead.
      • erika 3 months ago
        because penises dont cause pregnancies, only womens vaginas... smh
      • Word Up 3 months ago
        men. seriously right? i hate them all sometimes.
      • Khilasa 3 months ago
        The government is all about giving 80 year old men boners, doncha know?
    • Jodi  •  Alpharetta, Georgia  •  3 months ago
      What happened to small government?? Why does the government feel it is any of their business? They want us to have babies but fail to help after that.
    • Cherrie  •  Raleigh, North Carolina  •  3 months ago
      Birth control pills is used to treat conditions completly unrelated to pregnacy. I know several women who were put on birth control (one had her tubes tied) to treat other conditions. These MEN obviously dont understand much about women's health issues- so why do they think they are qualified to pass these laws? I agree with one of the other commenters... make birth control over the counter medication.
    • Ellen  •  3 months ago
      All of the above are men. Anyone else see a problem with that? Maybe if we had some WOMEN in charge things would be better and birth control would be available to anyone who needs it.
    • Jon  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  3 months ago
      This is why we need to keep a democrat in office the republicans flip their stories so much half of the time im not sure if they even remember anything that they say or are they just clod hearted backstabbers? The republicans want to cut the taxes for the rich and raise for the poor and take away what little health care the poor are available to it's okay through because they can afford it since we pay these idiots hundreds of thousands of dollars why not give back a litte huh? I agree if you work hard for something you should reap the rewards but not if you have to step on little people to get there
    • Lily Mick  •  Bigfork, Montana  •  3 months ago
      So because their religious beliefs say birth control is wrong we should outlaw it? (And if anyone thinks this isn't about their religious beliefs just listen to how many times they reference God in their speeches) Yet employees of a church can't sue for discrimination or wrongful termination because that is infringing on the separation of church and state.
    • Leah  •  3 months ago
      This is ridiculous. Say what you may about your belief on abortion, however womens health issues being dictated by men is absolutely not ok. Planned Parenthood offeres so many other services then abortion its really unfortunate thats what everyone choses to focus on and Komen pulling their support for PP is just as saddening that so many people wont get cancer screenings. Birth control is more then just preventing pregnancy, there are so many other reasons women go on it. Not to mention why exactly is the government thinking they should be involved in my repoductive rights? The majority of these law makers are men, just another way they can control women, what's next - women can no longer vote? Once you mess with one civil liberty its becomes a really grey area for what might come down the road.
    • reagan_eyes  •  Norfolk, Virginia  •  3 months ago
      This is a joke, right? To ban birth control and then penalize states that have high numbers of illegitimate children? That's an oxymoron! And in cases of incest when the child may have serious birth defects, possibly reducing their quality of life, have it anyway? In cases of rape, go ahead? I watched an interview with Piers Morgan and Santorum where S said that if his own daughter was raped and got pregnant he would 'urge her to do the right thing (keep the baby).' When Piers asked 'What if it would ruin her life?' He replied, 'Don't you think killing her child would ruin her life?' Oh please. And may I just say that hearing men speak about abortion in the first place makes my blood boil? I am not a feminist at all but I feel that a man cannot have a child and therefore cannot make judgements. I would imagine that it's hard for a man to put themselves in a woman's shoes to begin with, let alone to imagine an unplanned pregnancy. Infuriating.

    Join us on Pinterest

    DAILY SHOT VIDEO

    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.