Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    SELF speaks out about Kelly Clarkson photo retouching

    Sept09.SELF.cover.72dpi.jpgDO WE RETOUCH? YES!

    Last Friday, the Internet was abuzz with the fact that I answered the question, did you Photoshop the September issue cover photo of Kelly Clarkson? with the answer: Yes. Of course we do retouching (though it's technically not Photoshop, but that is semantics). We correct color and other aspects of the digital pictures we take and then publish the best version we can. Here is what I have to add to this conversation:

    When I ran the marathon five years ago, I was so proud of myself for completing it in under five hours and not walking a single step. But my hips looked big in some of the photos (I was heavier then), so when I wanted to put one of them on the editor's letter in SELF, I asked the art department to shave off a little. I am confident in my body, proud of what it can accomplish, but it just didn't look the way I wanted in every picture.

    This is still true even when I'm all dressed up at a party or wedding or other event-there are pictures where I think I was captured looking my best, and those when I look pretty awkward (midsentence or whatever). I only keep the pix where I look my best.

    The same is true of vacation. I keep the pix that show us all happy and glowing and laughing and playing, not the ones where we are scowling or hungry or tired. The ones that make the Christmas card are the best of the best.

    Find out what Ok! got wrong with it's Jessica Simpson cover.

    THE COVER PORTRAIT

    Pictures are meant to tell a story, express a feeling, convey an emotion or capture a moment. Portraits like the one we take each month for the cover of SELF are not supposed to be unedited or a true-to-life snapshot (more on that in a moment). When the cover girl arrives at the shoot, she is usually unmade up and casually dressed, and could be mistaken for a member of the crew or the editorial team in many cases. Once we do her makeup and hair, and dress her in beautifully styled outfits and then light her, we then set the best portrait photographer we can on a road to finding a pose and capturing a moment that shows her at her best. This usually involves music for her to relax to, props, painted backdrops or locations that create a natural context. Then the shoot starts and after about 100 images are snapped, there are outfit changes and more lighting adjustments, more hair touch-ups and fans blowing, etc. The scene is truly amazing to watch and there are often two dozen people on set.

    Then we edit the film and choose the best pictures. This is done in tandem with the star; the creative director, Cindy Searight; the photographer; and myself. Then we allow the postproduction process to happen, where we mark up the photograph to correct any awkward wrinkles in the blouse, flyaway hair and other things that might detract from the beauty of the shot. This is art, creativity and collaboration. It's not, as in a news photograph, journalism. It is, however, meant to inspire women to want to be their best. That is the point.

    See what Kelly actually looks like in the behind the scenes cover shoot video!

    KELLY'S CONTAGIOUS CONFIDENCE

    Kelly has this amazing spirit, the kind of joie de vivre that certain people possess that makes you want to stand closer to them, hoping that you can learn what they know. In this case, you get the feeling Kelly has not let fame spoil her, but also that she was just born confident, with a generosity of spirit that is all about others and rarely about herself. She is, like her music, giving and strong and confident and full of gusto. Did we alter her appearance? Only to make her look her personal best. Did we publish an act of fiction? No. Not unless you think all photos are that. But in the sense that Kelly is the picture of confidence, and she truly is, then I think this photo is the truest we have ever put out there on the newsstand. I love her spirit and her music and her personality that comes through in our interview in SELF. She is happy in her own skin, and she is confident in her music, her writing, her singing, her performing. That is what we all relate to. Whether she is up or down in pounds is irrelevant (and to set the record straight, she works out and does boot-camp-style training, so she is as fit as anyone else we have featured in SELF). Kelly says she doesn't care what people think of her weight. So we say: That is the role model for the rest of us.

    See our tips: Self-confidence tips from successful women!

    RETOUCHING MYSELF!

    Oh, and by the way, today I would let my marathon picture run unaltered. Back when I started at SELF, I was always saying to photographers who would shoot me: "No pimples, no wrinkles, no thighs!" and they'd laugh and remind me I was the one editing the film! Then I realized I could always edit, crop out and correct anything I didn't like later. So I did. But now I video blog (with my little Flip camera) about triathloning and you see me looking like a nearly drowned kitten after a swim, or prerace nervous, or unlit and unmade up. Half the time I am shooting on zoom (inadvertently) and up my nostrils (can't get the angle right, got to hold camera higher!) and guess what? Now I don't care. Because I've gotten more confident in myself. I know what my body can do (thanks to training for triathlons) and that means more to me than how I look on any given day. Do I still get all made up and have my hair done for a portrait or TV appearance? You bet! (I try to even have my own pic taken at a cover shoot since that is when we have the best makeup and photographer and lighting. I'm no fool... use the best when you can get 'em! But I also know that there are times when you just want to be yourself, and that means no artifice. So pictures have different purposes...

    ONE MORE THING ON THE KELLY FRONT

    You will notice the snapshot of Kelly and her sister Alyssa inside the mag later this month, and she took it with her phone and sent it to us. We ran it. It's a very bloggy moment, and they are both happy, lovely and "normal" looking. It could be any two girls just having fun together, who happen to look almost identical as sisters sometimes do when they're together. In that shot neither looks like a "glammed-up rock star," and that's what I loved about the picture. It's just Kelly and her sis, being themselves. Frankly, those are my favorite pictures, the ones that are snappy happy. My husband has given me an appreciation for the beauty of a snapshot. But that isn't a cover. A cover's job is to sell the magazine, and we do that, every month, thanks to our readers. So thank you.

    Your job: Think about your photographs and what you want them to convey. And go ahead and be confident in every shot, in every moment. Because the truest beauty is the kind that comes from within.

    MORE FROM SELF:

     

    68 comments

    • Ashley  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  21 days ago
      The magazine should change its name to "faux self", it would be much better suited, than the bill of goods the editor is trying to sell.
    • The_Moondog  •  21 days ago
      So what you are saying is that you would rather lie to the world than admit you have wide hips? That is awesome! I'm not ashamed to say that I am fat, now that I am doing something about it. The picture I show everyone is not me in my Marine uniform from 15 years ago. It's the one of me in a pair of lounge shorts from December when I weighed 260 pounds. I've lost thirty since then.
      You are what you are, own it and do something real about it.
    • Faith B  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  21 days ago
      Giving young girls an unrealistic idea of what they're supposed to look like is not art. Retouching photos to achieve digital perfection is not art. This is unjustifiable, and reading between the lines, I'd say this woman knows that. If she didn't, she wouldn't have written this long-winded list of excuses. But then again, if they don't scare us into thinking we don't look the way we're supposed to, we wont buy the cosmetics and hair products advertised on ever other page, right? ;) Clever. Because eating disorders, self-hatred, self-mutilation, and serious emotional distress in millions of young women is totally worth some corporate snobs getting they're wallets stuffed. Am I getting this right?
    • BritneyBriana  •  21 days ago
      Marilyn Monroe was a size 14. Beauty can be found in every size!
    • Nancy_J  •  Hillsborough, New Jersey  •  21 days ago
      I do not buy this boring and much too long winded attempt to justify the 'airbrushing" or whatever you call it. I would appreciate TRUE images. Period.
    • whatitis  •  1 year 9 months ago
      Self just reinforced the streotype that if you are larger than a size 6, then you are not beautiful. That must have made Kelly feel awful! Kelly has always prided herself as being happy with herself and not feeling the pressure to confirm to the common standard of beauty. And self in essence told Kelly that being herself wasn't good enough.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  1 year 9 months ago
      I wont buy the mags. that show only skinny beayties on their covers. I am 5'2" and weigh 190, but I am a beautiful mother,wife and grandmother, not to mention friend. So show your true self to all.
    • jakleeann  •  1 year 8 months ago
      Agreed -- you didn't tell us anything -- a lot of bologna -- which means you're hiding something. I don't believe a word of it.You are conveying very conflicting ideas and it will only confuse your readers.
      This is what has been going on in marketing for women forever, and makes me sick. You aren't giving us any thing that's new -- just the same old junk.
      Put your money where your mouth is -- don't edit the pics!
    • Mark S  •  1 year 8 months ago
      How about applying the same scrutiny to the text: "Find out what Ok! got wrong with it's Jessica Simpson cover" has evidently been displayed here for over a month with its glaring misspelling.
    • bella  •  1 year 9 months ago
      O ! THIS IS SO LAME !!!! LOOK AT THE COVER AND READ THE TITLES OF THE ARTICLES ... IT SI ALL ABOUT LOOSING WEIGHT, ERASING POUNDS, LOOKING SLIM BY SATURDAY - YEP !!!! YOU CAN ONLY DO THAT ON PHOTO SHOP BUT YOU SALE MAGAZINE BY TELLING WEMEN THEY HAVE HAVE TO BE SLIM AND SHOWING THEM VERY SLIM BUT NOT REAL IMAGE OF A PERSON WE ALL KNOW DOES NOT LOOK THIS WAY !!!! IT IS SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OFFENDING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I JUST WENT BACK TO SEE THE PIC AGAIN AND READ THE TOPICKS AND THE WHOLE THING MADE ME ANGRY !!!!
    • Bonnie  •  1 year 9 months ago
      There's a helluva difference between airbrushing out the occasional zit and shaving off a bunch of weight. Anyone can comprehend removing a blotch or zit, but the message being sent from the media, fashion industry, etc. is that now even normal weight is bad; one must be anorexic. It's a terrible message to send to young women.

      For a magazine that purports to preach health, they're missing the boat. While most agree that being overweight is a health problem, so is being too thin courtesy of anorexia. Most women can never look as thin as those retouched photos and sadly enough, some will die trying.

      And Lucy, you're lying, if not to us, than yourself. If you are, as you say "confident in my body" you wouldn't be having the photo retouched to make you look thinner. You would have posted it as it was. There's a difference between prettifying oneself with a hairdo and makeup, and digitally altering one's appearance to look thinner. Please don't insult the intelligence of your readership and the rest of us by offering us that load of manure of an excuse.
    • Fair and Balanced  •  1 year 9 months ago
      did you just avoid answering a question by going into a ton of bulls*it? I feel sorry for anyone who has to deal with you irl. You should also quit trying to make females to look like 12 year old boys, noone wants to date a 12 year old boy, thats horrible. You obviously have no idea what males want unless your targeting the gay population.
    • Lauren  •  1 year 9 months ago
      It's pretty upsetting that SELF, a magazine REAL women look to for advice and encouragement would photoshop anyone's image! If you have big hips-SO WHAT!?!? this magazine is supposed to teach people to be healthy, confident, and love themselves.. but you photoshop kelly?? hhmm... of course pimples are one thing...but the size of a person? that's a different story... you can't tell people to love themselves and be healthy and then make someone on your cover look skinnier..
    • ArielC  •  1 year 9 months ago
      Totally lame reasoning. Sure you're about being self-confident but you're also about altering someone to look better than you think they look. I'm so glad I haven't subscribed in YEARS. You do not help women. You damage them.
    • Loyatist Shinra  •  1 year 9 months ago
      I do this for a living, and a bad picture, is a bad picture. The photoshoped
      ( and I do mean photoshoped ) image, of the creases is what is wrong. If they were to, umh say. REMOVE THE WRINKLES, BEFORE THE SHOOT, along with air brushing, the model, ( with a real air brush ), and ACTUALLY TELL THE MODEL THAT SHE IS TOO FAT OR TOO ETC ( like my sister was a model until they told, her she was too fat ), Then do the whole photo shoot, again. Maybe and just maybe nobody would care.

      What is wrong with the imagine, is that she looks like an Asian, or Latino woman and she is 16. I being true on that. There is absolutely no shape at in the shot. A real woman, who ran marathon, and then did a photoshoot, is bound to have some kind of gain, or loss in body mass. BEING CHEAPER IS NOT GOING TO SLOVE THE PROBLEM, NORE IS GETTING LIFO SUCTION.

      SELF MAGAZINE IS A COMPLETE JOKE. You talk about confidence, and tell the photographer.
      "Don't show my true image, just make me look like, what people think is beautiful". YOUR LIKE A BACKWARDS RICHARD SIMMONS. If RICHARD SIMMONS MADE A MAGAZINE RIGHT NOW, AND PUT HIS OLD SCHOOL BODY ON THE COVER, THAT MAGAZINE WOULD SELL TEN TIMES THEN YOUR COMPUTERIZED, FAKO BODY. UNLIKE YOU SIMMONS IS THE REAL SELF.

      If Richard Simmons made a magazine like yours, it would be read, better then yours.Watch.
    • L.C. 2010  •  1 year 9 months ago
      Ann Taylor looks like an Ethiopian Refugee with the photo retouch!. .. There was NOTHING wrong with the FIRST PHOTO!.. IT just looked more realistic... Come on woman... As a man...(and a connesseur of women, We like natural.. We HATE perfect... !! or "TOO made up!..
      Women come with curves, and beautiful..shapes... sizes... panty lines.. etc.. WE LOVE ALL OF THAT!!..
      Lets EMBRACE REAL WOMEN WHO AREN'T AFRAID TO BE THEMSELVES IN ALL THEIR GLORY!!!...
      WE WILL LOVE YOU FOR IT!!.
    • Sergio  •  1 year 9 months ago
      memo to self magazine editors: stop deceiving people with gross picture manipulation and, more importantly, please do not treat your readers like idiots with totally lame attempts at justifying your blatant deceptions. you are losing the little trust you may have built with your customers, while risking to become a joke and a completely irrelevant publication quite soon. thank you!
    • L.C. 2010  •  1 year 9 months ago
      Ann Taylor looks like an Ethiopian Refugee with the photo retouch!. .. There was NOTHING wrong with the FIRST PHOTO!.. IT just looked more realistic... Come on woman... As a man...(and a connesseur of women, We like natural.. We HATE perfect... !! or "TOO made up!..
      Women come with curves, and beautiful..shapes... sizes... panty lines.. etc.. WE LOVE ALL OF THAT!!..
      Lets EMBRACE REAL WOMEN WHO AREN'T AFRAID TO BE THEMSELVES IN ALL THEIR GLORY!!!...
      WE WILL LOVE YOU FOR IT!!.
    • Jean  •  1 year 9 months ago
      I agree, SELF is a great magazine! I am ambivilant re; airbrush or no airbrush. Perhaps all this hub-bub is because of the latest version of telling the public the 'truth'.

      The more recent 'truth' is that there is an 'obesity epidemic' in America! I challenge that there are more obese people here than in any other country.

      I speak as a woman who is labled 'morbidly obese'. I had Jejuno-Illial Abdominal Bypass Surgery in April 1976. In July 1978, I had it reversed because I was dying from the side effects! I faithfully followed the prescribed diet and yet I would be home for two weeks with an abnormal need for the bathroom. Then I would be hospitalized for another two weeks with dangerously low potasium levels. The reverse surgery was the only way they could find to stop this pattern!

      I continued fighting my weight with diet and exercise to absolutely no avail! I even looked into stomach stapling--and finally came to the conclusion I had had my one experimental surgery FOR A LIFETIME! There will be no stapling, no insertion of bands that need to be tightened on a regular basis, this list is too long to continue.

      I am acutely aware that 99% of you 'know' that I really am a lazy overeater. I won't waste time trying to change your minds. Just remember that passing judgement on a stranger [or even a family member] is a dangerous practice. Someday you may be walking around fighting the exact same battle--don't kid yourself it can happen! Look at Marlon Brando, Orson Wells, Rosemary Clooney all slim and beautiful in their early careers, yet at the end they were all morbidly obese. Today's poster child for this is Kirsty Ally.

      I have studied this problem in depth. By the simple act of reading the ingredients list on package lables I have discovered that almost all prepackaged foods in our grocery stores are way-beyond 'full' of chemical preservatives. Additionally they add artificial coloring and sugars [yes plural] even to 'diet' products. Read the lables on a cup of fruit yogurt. Do not be surprised when you find a minimum of three sugars in the list! Plain or Greek style is best, then add your choice of a fresh seasonal fruit.

      I was using a store brand instant iced tea product. I have just become a diabetic and, carefully only used that to which I could add a sugar substitute. I found that I was getting an increase in my blood glucose levels when the only thing I had put in my mouth was my zero calorie iced tea. I really studied that lable. I finally called the dietician who worked at the headquarters of the grocery chain that sold this product.

      She was adamant that there was no sugar in the product! She thought I just had to be using some form of sucrose [sugar]. I told her which sweetener I used [approved by the National Diabetes Association], and she did agree that could not have been the problem. She had me wait for her to call the manufacturer for an explantion and get back to me about it. It seems that in order to 1) add to the flavor, and 2) to act as a 'filler' they had added something called maltodextrin. This is a dextrose by-product, yet they felt it would add no 'sugar reaction' as it is only a 'sugar alchol'.

      Diabetics can't do sugar and they can not do alchol-it drives up the glucose in your blood. Natural insulin, which controls sugar in your cells, is manufactured by your liver. Serosis of the liver is known primarily as a serious side effect of acute alcoholism. It is also a direct side effect of bariatric surgery [bypass]. When the intestine is interrupted to create the mechanical mechanism for the weight loss effect of this surgery, the kidneys and liver [normal filters for bodily byproducts] are put in a much more pronounced filtration activity which leads to scarring [serosis] of the liver and a higher instance of kidney stones. For some people, who just won't eliminate or cut back on fats from their diet, there is an increase in gall stones as well.

      This is all a direct result in trying to find a mechanical [surgery] way to lose weight. I've been told that it is because we are obsessed [male and female] with having a slim body. Perhaps it is more that we wish to be able to fit into the popular body type and/or handsome new clothing styles that drives us to go to these extremes.

      It would never do for an enlighted population of non-segregationists as we are here in the USA, to be perceived as discriminating against a portion of our citizenry! Yet we do not sell clothing to people above a specific size in regular clothing stores and/or catalogs. Even in the companies that sell to the large sized customer they charge a much higher compensation for sizes that go up in price in increments. {1x-3x, 4x-6x, 7x-9x]. [Regular length, tall, short/petite adds to specialty costs, too.]

      Average sized clothing may be tailored to adjust their sizes. There is even a vocabulary in the clothing industry: petite, regular, chubby, extra-tall extra-large, portly, junior. queen-sized, maxi, mini, infant. toddler, and even more I have forgotten.

      I would like to be able to say this IS a health issue, however, it ia very much a matter of money. Grocer's want to have prolonged shelf life products leading manufacturers to use more preservatives. Farmers want to sell as much of their product to as many people as they can, therefor, they spray their produce with pesticides and they use hormones and other chemicals in their livestock herds or fowl flocks. Even eggs carry-over manipulations ie: cholestrol free. The green movement may have a better reaction by people trying to really lose weight! Sustainable and/or organic food's coming from farmer's market's are not just chemical free, they are brought to market within hours of harvest. Fish are coming daily fresh not/or never frozen. Meat is being butchered in a much closer distance from the stores. If we actually reverse the mega-grocery chains and come back to local butcher's; dairymen [milk, cheese, butter, sometimes eggs,too]; poultry perveyor's might have to come back to bringing live birds to market for butchering and cleaning; refrigerated cases might hold 'fresh' product rather than a result of a factory formulated food.

      There is actually an entire medical industry in Bariatric Medicine, They advertise surgeries of many different types beyond the 'bypass' of the 1970's. There are crutches, wheelchairs, beds, 'hospital' clothing all aimed at obese [any type] people. We are made to feel guilty as active participants of the 'obesity epidemic'! There are television infomercials peddling 'diet' or 'weight loss' products, programs, even guaranteed 'exercise/nutrition', a series of dance or marshal arts DVD's, and combinations of vitamins and minerals that 'promise' to get your weight down by 100's of pounds. If being labeled overweight, chubby, fat, or morbidly [in danger of dying] obese isn't a 'profiling' technique, then I seriously misunderstand the concept. Are we going to be subject to the new Arizona type laws?

      Something causes the fat cells of our bodies to increase to excess, no one has ever suggested it to me, and yet, I feel that there is an almost allergic effect to the reactions we are having to preservatives and/or pesticides.

      In my opinion there are those of us who would love to be airbrushed if only to see what other's enjoy as their 'regular' daily appearance. Although, I do not understand the seeming to wish to resemble each other in a clone-like fashion. Kelly Clarkson is an 'original'! She is happy and content with her appearance, her career, her life' SELF should be trying to make a case to it's readers for the true beauty and joy of being content within your own skin.

      I was in a depressed mood on the night just prior to the surgery that reversed my bypass. The hospital intern who was taking my case history noticed that I was in a less than frivolous mood. He asked why I was so unhappy? I explained what I had gone through that had brought me to the stage of needing to reverse the original surgery. I felt that I had failed my surgeon in his desire to help me lose the weight. His attempt to cheer me up was to remind me of Titian and his paintings. He painted well-rounded and fully endowed ladies. The young man was the soul of kindness. He also told me that men really want variety in the women they meet in their lives. I tend to feel that he was a bit closer to the truth than our current fashion writers. As I said I have a warped viewpoint.

      One final truth--obese [fat] people do not look our of 'fat' eyes. Many of us will enjoy and celebrate looking at others [airbrushed or not], yet, refuse to look in a mirror any larger than the medicine cabinet at themselves!
    • steeler  •  1 year 9 months ago
      self sounds like BS to me. no doubt. color correction, fly away hari, wrinkle in the shirt---is very different than slimming someone down. they are after perfection - WHO IS PERFECT?
      no one - so show people looking beautiful with what they have or don't have.

      thumbs down to SELF

    Join us on Pinterest

    DAILY SHOT VIDEO

    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.