Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The 7 foods experts won't eat

    How healthy (or not) certain foods are-for us, for the environment-is a hotly debated topic among experts and consumers alike, and there are no easy answers. But when Prevention talked to the people at the forefront of food safety and asked them one simple question-"What foods do you avoid?"-we got some pretty interesting answers. Although these foods don't necessarily make up a "banned" list, as you head into the holidays-and all the grocery shopping that comes with it-their answers are, well, food for thought:

    20 ways to feed your family for $100 a week.

    1. Canned Tomatoes

    The expert: Fredrick vom Saal, PhD, an endocrinologist at the University of Missouri who studies bisphenol-A

    The problem: The resin linings of tin cans contain bisphenol-A, a synthetic estrogen that has been linked to ailments ranging from reproductive problems to heart disease, diabetes, and obesity. Unfortunately, acidity (a prominent characteristic of tomatoes) causes BPA to leach into your food. Studies show that the BPA in most people's body exceeds the amount that suppresses sperm production or causes chromosomal damage to the eggs of animals. "You can get 50 mcg of BPA per liter out of a tomato can, and that's a level that is going to impact people, particularly the young," says vom Saal. "I won't go near canned tomatoes."

    The solution: Choose tomatoes in glass bottles (which do not need resin linings), such as the brands Bionaturae and Coluccio. You can also get several types in Tetra Pak boxes, like Trader Joe's and Pomi.

    14 worst health mistakes even smart women make.

    2. Corn-Fed Beef

    The expert: Joel Salatin, co-owner of Polyface Farms and author of half a dozen books on sustainable farming

    The problem: Cattle evolved to eat grass, not grains. But farmers today feed their animals corn and soybeans, which fatten up the animals faster for slaughter. More money for cattle farmers (and lower prices at the grocery store) means a lot less nutrition for us. A recent comprehensive study conducted by the USDA and researchers from Clemson University found that compared with corn-fed beef, grass-fed beef is higher in beta-carotene, vitamin E, omega-3s, conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), calcium, magnesium, and potassium; lower in inflammatory omega-6s; and lower in saturated fats that have been linked to heart disease. "We need to respect the fact that cows are herbivores, and that does not mean feeding them corn and chicken manure," says Salatin.

    The solution: Buy grass-fed beef, which can be found at specialty grocers, farmers' markets, and nationally at Whole Foods. It's usually labeled because it demands a premium, but if you don't see it, ask your butcher.

    25 ridiculously healthy foods you should be eating now.

    3. Microwave Popcorn

    The expert: Olga Naidenko, PhD, a senior scientist for the Environmental Working Group,

    The problem: Chemicals, including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), in the lining of the bag, are part of a class of compounds that may be linked to infertility in humans, according to a recent study from UCLA. In animal testing, the chemicals cause liver, testicular, and pancreatic cancer. Studies show that microwaving causes the chemicals to vaporize-and migrate into your popcorn. "They stay in your body for years and accumulate there," says Naidenko, which is why researchers worry that levels in humans could approach the amounts causing cancers in laboratory animals. DuPont and other manufacturers have promised to phase out PFOA by 2015 under a voluntary EPA plan, but millions of bags of popcorn will be sold between now and then.

    The solution: Pop natural kernels the old-fashioned way: in a skillet. For flavorings, you can add real butter or dried seasonings, such as dillweed, vegetable flakes, or soup mix.

    Your nutritional guide to grocery shopping.

    4. Nonorganic Potatoes

    The expert: Jeffrey Moyer, chair of the National Organic Standards Board

    The problem: Root vegetables absorb herbicides, pesticides, and fungicides that wind up in soil. In the case of potatoes-the nation's most popular vegetable-they're treated with fungicides during the growing season, then sprayed with herbicides to kill off the fibrous vines before harvesting. After they're dug up, the potatoes are treated yet again to prevent them from sprouting. "Try this experiment: Buy a conventional potato in a store, and try to get it to sprout. It won't," says Moyer, who is also farm director of the Rodale Institute (also owned by Rodale Inc., the publisher of Prevention). "I've talked with potato growers who say point-blank they would never eat the potatoes they sell. They have separate plots where they grow potatoes for themselves without all the chemicals."

    The solution: Buy organic potatoes. Washing isn't good enough if you're trying to remove chemicals that have been absorbed into the flesh.

    14 ways to make veggies less boring.

    5. Farmed Salmon

    The expert: David Carpenter, MD, director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany and publisher of a major study in the journal Science on contamination in fish.

    The problem: Nature didn't intend for salmon to be crammed into pens and fed soy, poultry litter, and hydrolyzed chicken feathers. As a result, farmed salmon is lower in vitamin D and higher in contaminants, including carcinogens, PCBs, brominated flame retardants, and pesticides such as dioxin and DDT. According to Carpenter, the most contaminated fish come from Northern Europe, which can be found on American menus. "You can only safely eat one of these salmon dinners every 5 months without increasing your risk of cancer," says Carpenter, whose 2004 fish contamination study got broad media attention. "It's that bad." Preliminary science has also linked DDT to diabetes and obesity, but some nutritionists believe the benefits of omega-3s outweigh the risks. There is also concern about the high level of antibiotics and pesticides used to treat these fish. When you eat farmed salmon, you get dosed with the same drugs and chemicals.

    The solution: Switch to wild-caught Alaska salmon. If the package says fresh Atlantic, it's farmed. There are no commercial fisheries left for wild Atlantic salmon.

    Delicious and easy fish recipes

    6. Milk Produced with Artificial Hormones

    The expert: Rick North, project director of the Campaign for Safe Food at the Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility and former CEO of the Oregon division of the American Cancer Society

    The problem: Milk producers treat their dairy cattle with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH or rBST, as it is also known) to boost milk production. But rBGH also increases udder infections and even pus in the milk. It also leads to higher levels of a hormone called insulin-like growth factor in milk. In people, high levels of IGF-1 may contribute to breast, prostate, and colon cancers. "When the government approved rBGH, it was thought that IGF-1 from milk would be broken down in the human digestive tract," says North. As it turns out, the casein in milk protects most of it, according to several independent studies. "There's not 100% proof that this is increasing cancer in humans," admits North. "However, it's banned in most industrialized countries."

    The solution: Check labels for rBGH-free, rBST-free, produced without artificial hormones, or organic milk. These phrases indicate rBGH-free products.

    Don't be fooled by these 11 health food imposters.

    7. Conventional Apples

    The expert: Mark Kastel, former executive for agribusiness and codirector of the Cornucopia Institute, a farm-policy research group that supports organic foods

    The problem: If fall fruits held a "most doused in pesticides contest," apples would win. Why? They are individually grafted (descended from a single tree) so that each variety maintains its distinctive flavor. As such, apples don't develop resistance to pests and are sprayed frequently. The industry maintains that these residues are not harmful. But Kastel counters that it's just common sense to minimize exposure by avoiding the most doused produce, like apples. "Farm workers have higher rates of many cancers," he says. And increasing numbers of studies are starting to link a higher body burden of pesticides (from all sources) with Parkinson's disease.

    The solution: Buy organic apples. If you can't afford organic, be sure to wash and peel them first.

    How to pay less for organic.

    More tips for healthier living from Prevention:

    Diet Dos and Don'ts for Better Sex

    13 Signs You're Obsessed With Food

    9 Power Foods That Boost Immunity

    7 Hidden Places Lead is Lurking





    Be your own Biggest Loser and keep your brain sharp with exercise! Sign up today for meal plans, exercises, tools, support and more! Join the club today and get 3 FREE books!





    Shorter days and heavier foods can zap your motivation to exercise. Don't let the pounds creep back on this holiday season! Lose weight and tone up easily with Liz and 2-Week Turnaround!

    Loading...
     
    • Patrick  •  Limestone, Maine  •  10 days ago
      If the organic apples you're buying look like the conventional apples right next to them then they probably aren't getting sprayed any less. If anything they might be getting sprayed more and they are definitely sprayed with more toxic pesticides like copper and sulfur. Growers that use integrated pest management are your best bet for relatively safe and ecologically sound apples. Organic does not equal good.
    • Paul S  •  2 months ago
      Interesting and scary. But mostly scary.
    • Zuma's mama  •  3 months ago
      The canned tomatoes surprised me since organic canned tomatoes are available. I was also unaware of the microwave popcorn problem. The other foods I was aware of but still would like to know if the organic canned tomatoes have a different type of can or have I been buying clean tomatoes in an unhealthy container! Seems pretty shoddy at best.
    • ronmash  •  5 months ago
      after posting this on facebook, I thought to myself: Why would you post such a thing? you are the least health-conscious person you've ever known when it comes to food. I should confess, it was because of the feeding cows corn story. I think the best thing is not to eat at all and drink instead like juice, vitamins/minerals supplements and beer (great source of vitamin B and barley) lol
    • todd  •  6 months ago
      Its funny how people want to bash others for changing their lifestyle and wanting to eat healthier. Alot of the reasons we are sick today and unhealthy can be traced back to the crap we ingest on a regular basis. If u want to start feeling better start eating better.
    • Envirozac  •  6 months ago
      Thanks for this! I rarely see articles that I agree with completely... this one I agree with whole-heartedly!
    • GraceMary P  •  7 months ago
      This is important information, but I am not going to repost it. Most of the people I know, including myself, are poor - below the poverty level poor. With the exception of pop corn the solution here is to by the most expensive type of a particular food on the market. I just can't afford it. I know it's bad to say I will trade my children's future health to save money today, but it's a reality. If I have $50 to feed a family of four this week, then I have to buy the cheapest. I do my best, but most of the time I don't have a choice. The catch-22 I am in makes me bitter and if I share this information with my friends, I know they're just going to get bitter, too.
    • Ray  •  9 months ago
      I urge as many readers of this Blog as possible to respond to Orowheat, Panera, McDonalds, Burger King, Wendys, etc. (pick as many as you like, but I would do Bimbo or Orowheat products first since they are sold at grocery stores) regarding their use of Azidocarbonamide. I urge you to make a difference. Thank you. See my email to Orowheat below:

      I am extremely disappointed to discover that you continue to use harmful chemicals such as Azidocarbonamide, which In the UK, "the Health and Safety Executive has identified azodicarbonamide as a respiratory sensitizer (a possible cause of asthma) and determined that products should be labeled with "May cause sensitization by inhalation." Azodicarbonamide may cause an allergic reaction in those sensitive to other azo compounds, such as food dyes. The consumption of azodicarbonamide may also heighten an allergic reaction to other ingredients in a food." That is a shame and I, a loyal customer, will no longer purchase your products until you stop using this contaminant and possibly harmful chemical.

      Do not steer me to the Kosher products or that there are alternative products either. You have a responsibility to sell good wholesome bread. You ruined your name, reputation and brand when you sold bread laced with a chemical compound that is illegal in some countries. I demand a change and will blog this information to others in the blog world in hopes that you began to act more responsibly in the future. Best regards, RB a former Orowheat fan.
    • Steve  •  9 months ago
      Wow! manufactured foods, and we can't even get that right!
    • michael peters  •  10 months ago
      Barbara, try telling that to people who are starving. People that don't have the luxuries we have, have no choice. You can choose to avoid Japanese and Chinese cultured fish to avoid the slim chance of radiation and antibiotic poisoning for your own safety but you're just hurting their economy and forcing them into starvation.
    • Barbara  •  10 months ago
      I think those who choose to believe pesticides are OK, are kidding themselves.
    • sue  •  10 months ago
      So many "research" efforts are not based on sound science. Do NOT believe everything. Exactly how is organic regulated? Are you really getting what you are paying for?
      Those who grow the food share the same values as those who consume it. We feed the food we grow to our families first. By 2050 the world's population will double. We must work together or more will starve.
    • T  •  11 months ago
      Yes, all about choices we make...
    • michael peters  •  11 months ago
      it really bothers me when people will avoid foods because they are afraid of getting sick later on in life. someone mentioned something about corporations greed but really you are being the greedy one. The reason we have developed these unhealthy methods of farming is because we have over 6 billion people in this world, most who do not have a choice in what they eat. They end up eating the most contaminated foods such as Chinese farmed shrimp (which this article failed to address and instead chose to talk about farmed salmon which are much safer). No one lives as long as they expect to. And yet no one expects death (even the old and dying) We cling to life with tightly grasping ignorance. People from many other nations don't live to half the age of most Americans but you wave this off and say "f*** them, let me live so they can die!" you have no empathy because these people are invisible to you. instead of condemning unhealthy farming and other practices in this world, why don't you first ask why do they exist? What is the benefit to the whole of humanity? (Not just a select group of people) Some people may die off due to cancer from pesticides but many others may survive because this technique exists to mass produce food for the millions of people in this country. Now with this question in mind, try to condemn pollution from automobiles or nuclear waste or oil spills. We would not be as advanced today as we are without these things. We might not even exist without them. You may say we are destroying earth but we really aren't capable of the destruction of life. Whatever way we pollute this world life will still persist. We couldn't even reset it to the precursors to life, amino acids. Even in the worst circumstances a single species of bacterium would reproduce and evolve. We are, however, capable of our self-destruction (which is actually what you meant) which shows again how greedy and self-centered you are. Maybe greedy and self-centered are too strong of words. You may accept egocentric a bit better. You can't acknowledge or think from another perspective, which I think no one can do. Because of that, I will never convince you otherwise. But I believe that as long as everyone is egocentric to the utmost, then every perspective in this world will be accounted for and the majority of good will continue to prevail.
    • michael peters  •  11 months ago
      it really bothers me when people will avoid foods because they are afraid of getting sick later on in life. someone mentioned something about corporations greed but really you are being the greedy one. The reason we have developed these unhealthy methods of farming is because we have over 6 billion people in this world, most who do not have a choice in what they eat. They end up eating the most contaminated foods such as Chinese farmed shrimp (which this article failed to address and instead chose to talk about farmed salmon which are much safer). No one lives as long as they expect to. And yet no one expects death (even the old and dying) We cling to life with tightly grasping ignorance. People from many other nations don't live to half the age of most Americans but you wave this off and say "f*** them, let me live so they can die!" you have no empathy because these people are invisible to you. instead of condemning unhealthy farming and other practices in this world, why don't you first ask why do they exist? What is the benefit to the whole of humanity? (Not just a select group of people) Some people may die off due to cancer from pesticides but many others may survive because this technique exists to mass produce food for the millions of people in this country. Now with this question in mind, try to condemn pollution from automobiles or nuclear waste or oil spills. We would not be as advanced today as we are without these things. We might not even exist without them. You may say we are destroying earth but we really aren't capable of the destruction of life. Whatever way we pollute this world life will still persist. We couldn't even reset it to the precursors to life, amino acids. Even in the worst circumstances a single species of bacterium would reproduce and evolve. We are, however, capable of our self-destruction (which is actually what you meant) which shows again how greedy and self-centered you are. Maybe greedy and self-centered are too strong of words. You may accept egocentric a bit better. You can't acknowledge or think from another perspective, which I think no one can do. Because of that, I will never convince you otherwise. But I believe that as long as everyone is egocentric to the utmost, then every perspective in this world will be accounted for and the majority of good will continue to prevail.
    • hakeem saleh  •  Chico, California  •  1 month 9 days ago
      I eat #$%$ all day, it's the best solution.
    • Wahwah  •  2 months ago
      This is the stupidest article ever. I hope noone takes this seriously
    • Bat Dawg  •  5 months ago
      why dont they ban it? because they are eugenicists and they are slow killing us - on purpose -
    • Mike Arends  •  11 months ago
      It's sad how hard it is to eat fresh, non toxic, food these days. I try to feed my son the freshest food possible but it is an uphill battle.
      -Chef Mike
      http://www.weightrelate.com
    • carbo  •  1 year 1 month ago
      Everybody knows bananas are like eating a big serving of cancer yet no mention of these, third world country pesticides are yummy