Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Are French Women the New Tiger Mothers?

    Are French kids raised better? (Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images)Are French kids raised better? (Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images) Parents used to look to doctors for advice on raising kids. Now they look to other countries. The latest contender for the world's best mom is from France. Author Pamela Druckerman's new book, Bringing Up Bébé: One American Mother Discovers the Wisdom of French Parenting, asserts that the Jerry Lewis-loving culture is better at raising children than Americans. Call her 'Le Tigre Mom', the French version of the 'Tiger Mother.' The latter refers to writer Amy Chua's popular Chinese parenting model emphasizing an extremely structured focus on academia.

    Read more about Tiger Mothers and Amy Chua's praise of Chinese parenting

    In contrast, the French parenting model, focuses on discipline, particularly in social situations.

    "Authority is one of the most impressive parts of French parenting," writes Druckerman, a mother of three, who spent years studying the culture's child-rearing methods. "Their kids actually listen to them. French children aren't constantly dashing off, talking back, or engaging in prolonged negotiations."

    Some of the admirable aspects of French-raised children, according to Druckerman's research:

    • They're better eaters. They don't throw tantrums in their high-chairs and they're less fussy about healthy food.
    • They're more polite with adults. Raised early on to say please, thank you and proper greetings, their social skills are embedded early on.
    • They're more likely to sleep through the night. Druckerman found evidence that French parents are less likely wake up every few hours or to attempt the "cry it out" practice.

    The French method to the madness of parenting has to do with straight-shooting discipline. Parents are not afraid to say "no" with direct and clear-cut meaning. They don't second-guess or switch around their parenting tactics as frequently, so as not to confuse or obscure messages for their young children. Delayed gratification is also implicit to French child-rearing. Kids don't get what they want just because they ask for it, and certainly not when it comes to snacks. Only one snack a day at the exact same time is a mainstay of the country's parenting culture, according to the author. That kind of unwavering structure may turn out "calmer and more resilient" children.

    But the most obvious benefits are for the parents. French mothers lose baby weight faster, have less guilt about their parenting choices, and as Druckerman observed, deal with far fewer public meltdowns at restaurants and gatherings. But do happier parents make happier kids?

    Not across the board. In recent years, the country's childhood obesity rates are closing in the States'. The French are also most likely to suffer a "major depressive episode" in their lifetime, according to a World Health Organization report

    Read more: top 8 parenting controversies of the year

    While you can't blame parents for everything, some popular parenting practices aren't worth adapting. A 2003 poll found that 84 percent of French parents admit to slapping or spanking their child.

    That type of punishment isn't just taboo in America, it's considered dangerous in the long term.
    "Anytime you hit or spank a child, you are teaching them that that's acceptable behavior," Susan Newman, Ph.D., a social psychologist who specializes in parenting, tells Shine. "There's study after study that says abused children have the potential to become abusers themselves. From my thinking there's no excuse for a parent hitting their child."

    Another questionably severe aspect of French parenting culture: a distinct lack of mother's milk. France has the lowest breast-feeding rates in the world, despite the largely accepted benefits of breast milk in the first six months of a child's life.

    "When you're looking to other cultures for parenting advice, you shouldn't adopt all the principles if they don't feel right for you and your family," says Newman, author of Parenting an Only Child: The Joys and Challenges of Raising Your One and Only. "You can pick one aspect to try if you think it's a good idea."

    If you're looking to France, they definitely can teach American parents how to relax. "Parenting has become a competitive sport in the States, and nobody ever wants to see their child unhappy."

    Like fad diets , the endless barrage of conflicting parenting advice in America is a boon for the publishing industry, but a blow to parental confidence.

    "I think anytime there's a new parenting craze it's hard not to get caught up in second-guessing your own style, especially when the people promoting their way seem so confident that they're raising kids the one right way," says Meagan Francis, author of The Happiest Mom. "There's no more effective mom than one who is true to her own principles and is open to new ideas, without jumping on every new fad just because somebody said it results in better kids."

    In that way, French parents are better off. "[The French] assume that even good parents aren't at the constant service of their children, and that there is no need to feel guilty about this," writes Druckerman.

    But there are some things we can teach the world, too. "American parents are known for putting their children first," says Newman. "As a result, children overall feel and know they're special."
     
    Copyright © 2012 Yahoo Inc.

    Related:
    The opposite of a Tiger Mother
    Does Chinese parents better with kids?
    How social media changed moms
    Survey picks best places in world to live

     
    • Molly  •  Phoenix, Arizona  •  11 days ago
      Parenting has "become a competitive sport" in America in large part due to the lack of firm discipline coupled with sky high expectations, particularly when it comes to breastfeeding. Perhaps those two things - occasional spankings and a laissez-faire approach to breastfeeding are not a fluke, but part of why they do so well with their kids.

      And anyway, that woman has a PhD in parenting? How many children has she raised? Any? Or should we ask her nanny?
    • Bere  •  Hyattsville, Maryland  •  13 days ago
      Nowadays hitting a child IS taboo in the States. Visit Nigeria where there's real punishment! But those kids grow up disciplined and hardworking. Coddling won't get your kids anywhere.
    • CodiS  •  Dayton, Ohio  •  10 days ago
      Every child is different. In my case, sitting me in time out was enough and 9/10 I'd get the point. My sister on the other hand needed to be spanked. I can count on one hand how many times I've been spanked, but in both situations neither of us became abusers. Furthermore, being spanked didn't teach us it was "acceptable behavior" it was UNacceptable behavior in the sense that our disrespectful actions should never go to the end all of being spanked.I'm not advocating for people to spank their children, but if it needs to happen, it needs to happen.
    • dede  •  13 days ago
      A society is judged by how it treats its children.
    • Sash  •  13 days ago
      And when the children become teenagers and give them the fits, the French parents... surrender.
    • _  •  22 days ago
      Speaking as a Frenchman, these crude generalizations about how the French raise their children are rather off.
      • MariaJ 22 days ago
        Nobody asked you, Michel.
      • BobbyD 22 days ago
        being French, I disagree. A bit generalized but overall correct
      • Thomas 22 days ago
        You know when one is describing a large group, generalization is the most correct and accurate way to speak. In fact, it's the only way to describe a group.
    • Laura O  •  New York, New York  •  22 days ago
      OMG that's the "French" style? Hello! That was the AMERICAN style when I was growing up. Nobody catered to me. Nobody indulged. If I got a special toy it was a BIG deal and yes I was raised to say "Please", "Thank you" and to ask to be excused from the table. I wasn't asked at 3 years old what I wanted for dinner, I got what I got and I asked mom what we were having! No one freaked over what I may or may not like. When you are hungry, you will eat! Parents today are pathetic. Go to YouTube and look for George Carlin's skit called "Child worship." We suffer from it here in the states.
      • Oops! Try again. 22 days ago
        I thought the exact same thing when I read this. I was raised in the 70s and 80s however, long before the advent of American helicopter-parenting.
    • really  •  Winston-Salem, North Carolina  •  24 days ago
      My goodness, I didn't know my parents were french--I'm in my late 40's and that sounds like I was raised. Before anyone wonders--I had and still have a fantastic relationship with my parents, have a good job and a really nice life and I credit these to my parents teaching me from the moment I could understand how life was and that I had to work hard for what I wanted.
    • Fluffy  •  21 days ago
      I do not see anything about this article as "The French Style of Parenting" as unusual or different than some parents in the US. I have 2 French friends - both living here in the US only 2 years and I have come to know them very well. One was a single mom and was financially able to spend all her time with her son while he was young. They continue to be close but not excessively or obsessively close. He is very private about his personal business.

      The other has a son and daughter, she is not very close with the son yet she is obsessively close with the 28 year old daughter - talks about her constantly. She hovers over the daughter and has been her 'friend' for many years.

      I think parenting is unique and what works for one may not necessarily work for another, and right, babies do not come with instructions manuals.

      But I do think it is very important for parents to spend as much time as they can with their children.

      *In my opinion* too many of us Americans have kids just to add to our collections of "stuff", dump the kids in daycare at 6 weeks, and the parents have very little part in raising their own kids. They'd rather pay a baby sitter a measly salary (and you do get what you pay for) to raise their kids instead of planning for the kids and making some sacrifices if necessary, and raise their kids themselves. Believe me, it can be done. They buy the kids tons of stuff they don't need (and usually can't afford) to try to show the kids they love them, when the kids really only want and need their parents time and attention. Then the parents wonder why the kids turn out the way they do.

      Our society should evaluate why these kids are turning out as they are.
    • glorificus m  •  Ypsilanti, Michigan  •  22 days ago
      I had a weird childhood. My mother has schizophrenizia and I spent most of my time with her as my father was at work. However, I am relatively happy with my childhood. Sure, there were some, "crazy" bits, but who the hell has a completely "normal" childhood anyway? I was an only child and I knew(and still know, much to my annoyance when they call a billion times a week) that my parents loved me more than anything on this planet and the thought of how fulfilled they would feel whenever I accomplished something great was what pushed me. I am 25(as of today) going into my second year of grad school with a 3.7 gpa. No one beat me, or made me take expensive music instrument lessons, or bullied me. I just know that when I walk across that stage to get my master of information systems diploma, that I will not only be making my parents happy, but also myself. Help your kids learn independence and responsibility to themselves(not just responsibility to others).
    • Laura  •  22 days ago
      I was raised like this and I would say it works as long as parents balance discipline with love and fairness. Most of all, I want to stress something that is not mentioned in this article, the importance of distinguishing from one child to another. Some children are naturally inclined to challenge authority and need a bit more discipline and other children need less. I was an easy, compliant child (according to my mom), yet she applied the same unwavering discipline on me. As a result, by the time I reached puberty, I had become withdrawn and disconnected from myself. It took me most of my adult life to recover my voice, my creativity and my ability to feel secure in who I am. Reflecting back, I feel I needed a softer approach. That being said, I feel discipline is very important and I see so many children nowadays who lack positive guidance and develop a false sense of entitlement. It is important for parents to set strong boundaries so that their children learn to respect others and ultimately themselves.
    • Reignman  •  21 days ago
      Spanking=child abuse!?! What a leap! People like that give liberals/progressives a bad name.
    • JaredS  •  21 days ago
      I hate to say this but I think spanking a child - within reason - shouldn't be taboo. I got a lot more than I deserved when I was a kid, but I there were most definitely times when I deserved it and it put me back in line. America's become a nation ef extremes - you can't spank a kid without beating the living %@$#$ out of him/her? Find moderation and stick with it! I didn't grow up to think it was acceptable to crack people upside the head, even though I'd like to some times!
    • Jen  •  Buffalo, New York  •  22 days ago
      I like how they say "Spanking" and then reference it as abuse. Hm. I was spanked, and yet I was not an "abused" child. Nor am I an abuser. People are so stupid.
    • Carol  •  Leeds, New York  •  21 days ago
      Let's see...I taught my children how to sit in a restaurant, quietly, in their seats from the time they were born. I/they were complimented by other patrons because they were quiet, stayed seated, ate properly, etc. All this started at home. My children (now 17 and 14) knew how to shake hands, be polite, etc....and we are NOT french. Oh, and yes..I DID spank my children when appropriate - NEVER out of my anger. It's called being raised as I was raised...with respect, discipline and high expectations. THIS is what is missing in parenting today.
    • Cookie  •  Richardson, Texas  •  13 days ago
      I was raised to say Please, Thank-you, Pardon me, Yes Mam, No Mam,and all of those little Southern phrases that people no longer embellish. There was no huh, I don't eat that, and I don't want to go to bed now. Respect was given. When adults talked you were not around. You knew better. You were not your parents friend. You were their child and being their child meant boundaries. And the parents set the boundaries. I did the same with my daughters and even now when out together, if they see a sassy child they say they could not have been your child. Their is a bridge between childhood and adulthood. It should not be crossed until you are an adult and even then-You remember how you got across that bridge.
    • Bee  •  Mobile, Alabama  •  19 days ago
      I imagine quite a few young parents are just overwhelmed. So many times I've heard those in their second marriages are usually better parents with their kids because they learned what not to do during their first time around.
    • nunya  •  21 days ago
      1) Slapping or spanking a child, as long as an open hand is the ONLY thing used, is NOT abusive. That brief sting of pain (less than 5 minutes) opens up the subconscious and allows the parent to directly tell the child from a position of Authority, that their current behavior is not acceptable. One of the few good things that came from my birth mother spanking me is that it kept me from becoming a bully. She told me after the sting of pain that picking on other kids was not acceptable and i stopped.
      Using a fist, foot, boot or shoe, or any other object to strike a child, IS abusive.
      2) Europeans, particularly the French, are not into commitment and so they do not want to breast-feed their children because they have to be with the child just about 24/7. I have never known a mom to regret breast-feeding, and the kids are better off breast-fed.
    • Kittenmommy  •  22 days ago
      So in other words, French parents discipline their children, teach them appropriate behavior, and don't hand them everything they want.

      This sounds like common sense to me, but hey, all my kids have four feet so my opinion is probably worthless!
      • BobbyD 22 days ago
        you can apply the same principles to pets. Humans are sending animals mixed signals all the time. Treat children as children and animals as animals. The main point of this article is exercising authority
    • Antrinox  •  22 days ago
      What a retarded author, not knowing the difference between spanking and abuse. Both of our kids were spanked fewer than 5 times in their childhood, all under the age of 5. In each case it was because they were doing something that could have had consequences far beyond a sore bottom. You go ahead and reason with your toddler not to run out in the street - be consistent about it and say all the right things. But in my opinion, a little physical pain is a far more effective lesson in consequences.
      • Erin Breda 22 days ago
        I'm a "millenial" (not a grandma) and I was spanked as a kid. My parents used it very sparingly; I could count the total times on two or even one hand. I have seen absolutely no negative emotional or mental effects, and I would do the same with my children.
      • Paul 21 days ago
        Go re-read the article. The author seems to know the difference between spanking and abuse, but you just skimmed over it.

        Better yet, read it here: "That type of punishment isn't just taboo in America, it's considered dangerous in the long term."

        She's saying WE, as a society, have made spanking taboo. And that's true.

        Parents are far less likely to spank their children than my parents generation was. Hell, I even got spanked by the school principle once (I grew up in the 60s), and you NEVER hear of that anymore.

        I think the point the author tried, but failed, to make was that TOO MUCH spanking constitutes abuse. Spanking should be kept to a minimum.

        Some psychologists -- including the one quoted -- tend to equate ANY spanking with abuse. To quote the one above, "There's study after study that says abused children have the potential to become abusers themselves."

        Note what that says: "... abused children have the potential..." It says ABUSED children have the POTENTIAL. It does not, however, say ALL children.

        And that's a very important point.

        The psychologist then states "From my thinking there's no excuse for a parent hitting their child." Clearly, she shows her own bias. As a result, she dismisses spanking altogether as a valid displinary practice. She missed the point of her own comment about these studies she mentions. The studies do NOT dismiss spanking outright.

        I think most parents would agree that spanking IS a valid displinary practice. The thing that all parents would want to watch for, however, is crossing the line into abuse.
      • Antrinox 21 days ago
        Don't be pedantic, Paul. And don't omit evidence that doesn't support your point. The article quotes studies which make clear that the study author equates spanking and abuse. But the article's author, departing from journalistic standards, also takes a position that you fail to mention: "some popular parenting practices aren't worth adapting [sic]." That isn't a psychologist's opinion or a summary of public opinion, it is the journalist's personal judgement.

    Join us on Pinterest

    DAILY SHOT VIDEO

    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.