Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Mother Files $900 Trillion Lawsuit Against NYC After Losing Custody of Sons

    (ThinkStock Photos)(ThinkStock Photos)Can any amount of money compensate for losing your family? $900 trillion is a start, for one outraged mom. Fausat Ogunbayo is suing the City of New York for an almost incalculable amount, after children's services removed her sons from her home in 2008.

    Both boys, now 16 and 13, were placed in foster care after their mom was deemed mentally unstable and refused treatment, reports the Staten Island Advance. The city's Administration for Children's Services claimed the 46-year-old suffered from hallucinations and delusions and left the boys alone frequently.

    Read more: child custody and the new battleground for parents of obese kids

    Ogunbayo denies those allegations, and claims her family has suffered "over three years of terror, horror, grievous harm, time lost, substantial economic hardship and injuries" due to the separation.

    Taken from their mom at just 12 and 10 years old, the boys have been living in another borough for the past three years. During that time their mother has fought in court to get them back.

    Last month, Ogunbayo had the claim that she was neglectful overturned by an appellate panel. According to that decision, there was no evidence that the children were in any "imminent danger" under her care. The boys had a "near perfect" attendance in school and were "thriving academically." They were also healthy and up to date on medical checkups and vaccines.

    Only when they left home did they encounter problems, according to Ogunbayo, who presented hand-written notes from her sons begging to come home. Last summer her eldest started having problems with the law while in foster care. He was arrested for possession of marijuana in August.

    The ACS, meanwhile, says their actions weren't unfounded. They had received several reports of bizarre behavior: Ogunbayo allegedly took her kids to the doctor claiming their skin was being radiated and told school officials the FBI and secret service were hunting her family.

    When she refused to get treated for what was believed to be a mental illness, her sons were placed in protective custody. But that's not grounds for breaking up a family. "Proof of mental illness alone will not support a finding of neglect," according to the court decision.

    More: Parents lose custody of child they named Hitler

    But with her kids still in child services' custody, Ogunbayo isn't satisfied. She wants her boys back and wants the city to pay for the emotional damage they've caused her family over the past three years. In her mind, she's owed 60 times the amount of our national debt.

    "It's hard to even take it seriously," Kate O'Brien Ahlers, a spokesperson for the city Law Department said in a statement to press. "There may be case, which is for a court of law to decide, but that's a made-up number."

    Ogunbayo, who is representing herself, claims that number is exactly what she deserves after losing her right to "family integrity."

    While that number may seem to back up the ACS claims of Ogunbayo's mental disconnect, there's also a logic behind it. On a practical level, the number alone has gotten this case the kind of attention other custody cases haven't. On an emotional level, the figure expresses the incalculable pain of losing her children. Right or wrong, Ogunbayo's lawsuit has raised the question: is there any compensation for breaking up a family?

    Related:
    Should 60-year-olds have babies?
    How stress affects foster kids
    Should parents lose custody of super-obese kids?

     
    • Mike D  •  Owings Mills, Maryland  •  3 months ago
      Wait in line woman... china is first.
      • Salman 3 months ago
        Actually, we are, then China's next.
      • Tracy 3 months ago
        haha.. hilarious
      • Russ 3 months ago
        it'sFED then China, and then everyone else.
    • Dagaen  •  Scranton, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
      If disrupting family integrity is a crime, then there's a lot of dads out there whose bat#$%$ crazy ex-wives, who have custody of their children, owe them 900 trillion dollars.
    • laverdad  •  West Palm Beach, Florida  •  3 months ago
      She is hitting the courts with a sledgehammer! and, believe me, that is what it takes. You do not get justice in this country if you do not have power, or a forum and she made her own forum!
      • Ray 3 months ago
        900 trillion dollars furthers the states case that she is looney tunes.
    • Selina  •  3 months ago
      She's representing herself? How's the saying go - anyone who represents themself in court has a fool for a client?
      • Al 3 months ago
        And anyone who doesn't has money coming out one's wazoo.
      • Cru 3 months ago
        Lawyers coined that phrase so you felt obligated to use their services.
      • Vicki 3 months ago
        She has already represented herself as a fool in society!
    • Jessica  •  Camden, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
      I often feel it's very wrong for any state to be able to make a judgement on someone else to justify taking their children away. Often these people truly love their children and their "crime" may be something as simple as poverty or ignorance. If her children were well cared for, then what right did the state have to come in an abduct her children? He mental illness may cause her to say or do odd things but if she caused the children no physical or mental harm then I feel they had no right to take them away. I'm also conflicted by the statement that they felt they had any right to take her kids because she refused treatment for a possible mental illness. How "free" are we really when our government has this level of control? I wouldn't want to think of someone forcing me to receive medication or "treatment" that they deem necessary if I don't want it. If the extent of her issues if that she says weird things, then what harm is she to anyone? I couldn't argue against it if she had a mental illness that caused her to be a real danger to others, if she were to harm or kill them, but otherwise I don't feel that our government should any right to dictate what we do with our own bodies or to abduct or loved ones if we don't comply to their "rules". I feel she IS owed compensation for the suffering this no doubt caused her and her kids, though the amount requested if obviously extreme and unrealistic.
      • my2centswrth 3 months ago
        This woman is dellusional, a real looney bird. Been there, done that. Seen it more than once up close. The boys are better off and safer where they are now. They should have done the same thing with the boys that were blown to Kingdom Come this week by THEIR loving father, who also had a screw loose. I bet she can't past her fingers and toes and couldn't put a million, a trillion, and a billion in the proper order. She is mentally unstable.
      • Tom Deb 3 months ago
        Most of the people who end up harming their kids start out as just saying odd things. However, if it gets worse and they hurt or kill their children, then the State didn't do enough. I would rather there be early intervention to make the parent get help before the kids are harmed. I'm so tired of seeing news stories about people killing their kids and there were warning signs that were ignored. Look at the Dad who just killed his kids in Washington (I think). There were signs he was out of it, but he was allowed to see the kids and they died.
      • Healthy4 YOU 3 months ago
        Well stated, Jessica. She also works full time + at Hertz. Having to file your own lawsuit is no piece of cake. Too little info for 2cents &tomdeb to draw their conclusions. I was babysitting my brothers(8 & 11) when I was 13. Amount demanded may prove to be a shrewd move and may get her some genuine pro bono legal help.
    • non-smoker  •  Chatsworth, California  •  3 months ago
      as a taxpayer, i feel like i'm being robbed.
    • I AM EPIC WIN  •  Newark, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
      There is no amount of money that can compensate breaking up a family for no reason. While I agree that ACS was acting on the best interest of the children, they should have been more diligent and accurate when they made their accusation which forced this woman to lose her children. She will not get this amount, but I hope and pray that she gets enough money to make ACS be more diligent and responsible when making this sort of accusations.
    • terry  •  Mayfield, Kentucky  •  3 months ago
      my gosh is this for real?
    • Ray  •  Andover, Massachusetts  •  3 months ago
      Yeah, suing the city for 900 trillion dollars is a sure fire way to convince them your not mentally unstable., right?
    • Alkebu Barca  •  Boston, Massachusetts  •  3 months ago
      If nothing else this case forces a public debate on government intrusion into the family dynamic. This nation needs to take a good look at the way government intrudes in to the family and why and how it can help families and not cause more harm....
    • yahoo user  •  3 months ago
      The lawyer is in agreement with the amount or he wouldn't have taken the case.
    • Valerie Kaylor  •  Hammond, Indiana  •  3 months ago
      Her $ amount proves she is mental. I cant believe they would remove the children out of a home without having a case against her to begin with. Something is missing in this story.
    • Michael M  •  Woonsocket, Rhode Island  •  3 months ago
      Suing for $900 Trillion, FBI is haunting my family, radiating skin, representing herself in a custody suit against NY? Yeah, sounds mentally unstable to me.
    • crusty  •  Walkersville, Maryland  •  3 months ago
      This is an example that those applying for entry into the United States be physically and mentally healthy as well as being of good moral character.
    • kevin  •  Denver, Colorado  •  3 months ago
      the people that think the state is at fault and deserve to pay because a psycho has her kids removed are idiots. Do you want a recent example of why the state has the right/need to protect kids from nut jobs? check out the Powells in colorado 3 days ago then convince other people that the state is wrong for trying to protect kids from nut jobs.
    • Lisa  •  Sacramento, California  •  3 months ago
      I can't imagine she is really expecting that much, but from a mother who's son was taken away at age 12 for almost 3 years, for something he did at the babysitter's house, the time away is priceless!
    • pauls  •  San Francisco, California  •  3 months ago
      suck money out of the system while leaving these parasites to prey on children, for their own good supposedly. This will accomplish little other than to turn on the lights for these psychos. I personally believe that these people on our dime, destroy a hundred times the lives they help, percentage wise, they are far more dangerous than child molesters, because those are the regulations. People have made it a full time living out of crashing through lives and families because they admittedly don't know what else to do but still feel obligated to do something. I will admit. I hate them. I wish bad things on them and I am sure that they will be directed to hell by someone else, just following orders. The day I no longer love my child I will again see them as something other than a mindless threat to children everywhere. Get a chair, this might just take a while.
    • kellyinlex  •  Louisville, Kentucky  •  3 months ago
      This woman is crazy .... like a fox. This court case would never have reached the national media had she not sued for this exorbitant amount of money. Now her case will be carefully scrutinized by the whole country if not the world. Pretty good for a mentally ill single mother representing herself in court. I hope she wins some of the money she is suing for, regains custody of her sons and causes a major examination of the ACS and their illegal and immoral practices.
    • James  •  Phoenix, Arizona  •  3 months ago
      If she were to win this, the attorneys would take $899+ trillion, and she would receive $1.00. The attorneys then would tell her it was "fair and justified".
    • Dianne W  •  Dayton, Ohio  •  3 months ago
      However miscalculated everyone feels her number is, she is right about no amount of money can replace or repair the damage done to the integrity of their family unit. She did get our attention!!

    Join us on Pinterest

    DAILY SHOT VIDEO

    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.