Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    This Woman Was Forced to be Sterilized: What Would You Do?

    During lunchtime one day last April, Wei Laojin, 35, was cooking spicy pork for her two young sons at home in southern China when she got a frantic call from her husband. His brother had been arrested, he said. A dozen Chinese officials had beaten down the man's door and dragged him away. "What has he done wrong?" Wei asked in alarm. "Nothing," her husband replied. "He has been jailed because he is related to us."

    Wei, a bird-thin woman with bobbed hair, let lunch burn on the stove as she heard more. "My husband said we had broken the law by having two children. The authorities were imprisoning his brother until we were punished," she says. "As soon as I learned it was about birth control , I began to cry and shake." Family-planning officials in the southern county of Puning, in Guangdong province, were going to shocking new extremes to catch and punish violators of the country's infamous one-child policy: They were seizing family members of women who had given birth illegally and were holding them hostage. The aim? To coerce the women into submitting to sterilization. Says Wei, "The officials said there was only one way to get my brother-in-law released: I had to undergo forced sterilization."

    As Wei panicked in her kitchen, the same scene was playing out in households all over Puning, a region of 2.2 million people, about six hours by bus from the provincial capital of Guangzhou. In early April, the local Family Planning Bureau, which oversees population control, launched what it termed an "Iron Fist Campaign," targeting 10,000 women who had more than one child.

    Related: Womb for Rent: Indian Surrogate Mothers Exposed

    According to state-owned media-which proudly reported the news on local channels-a task force of more than 600 officials was deployed to storm homes across 28 Puning townships and seize family members of women who had broken the law. They took grandparents, siblings, teenagers, even infants. The relatives were to be jailed indefinitely until the targeted women showed up at government clinics to undergo "remedial surgery," or sterilization.

    The campaign was unprecedented in recent Chinese history. According to He Yafu, one of China's leading independent experts on family planning, there had been occasional reports of relatives being detained in the past, and forced sterilization has been an abuse associated with the one-child policy since it was introduced in 1978, but this was a crackdown on an unusually large and draconian scale.

    Certainly, the campaign came out of the blue for most Puning inhabitants. Family planning in the region had grown lax because the local population had been consumed with breakneck economic development. Guangdong province is the most successful manufacturing region in mainland China, with a per capita income of $5,965-almost twice the national average. A snaking backdrop of lush green mountains is rapidly being devoured by urban sprawl, and the air is clogged with construction dust. "People in the south are different. They feel that laws in the rest of the country don't apply to them," says Chinese economist Dean Peng. "It seems that many people here believed they could have a large family without serious repercussions."

    Wei, a seamstress, was well aware she had breached the one-child policy by having two sons, Xiaojie, now age 6, and Xiaoming, age 4. (In deference to China's ingrained preference for sons, the government sometimes allows couples to have a second child, but only if the firstborn is a girl.) As punishment, the authorities refused to officially register the younger boy, who is mildly disabled, thereby denying him access to state health care and education. The family was also ordered to pay a fine of 5,000 yuan ($750), amounting to a third of their annual income (the heaviest fines for birth-policy violators are up to six times a couple's annual income). Wei knew there would be consequences to having two kids, but says, "Children mean happiness to people here. The bigger your family, the greater your joy. It's as simple as that."

    The Chinese government disagrees. As the world's most populous country, with 1.4 billion people (one in five humans worldwide is mainland Chinese), the state believes limiting the birth rate is vital to preserving resources and creating sustainable economic growth. In the past, when most people worked in state-owned factories and on farms, officials enforced family-planning quotas with brutal efficiency. Their methods included giving women forced abortions up to even the ninth month of pregnancy, and smothering newborns and dumping them in the trash. Female workers were required to prove they were menstruating by showing supervisors a soiled sanitary napkin every month. But as the country has gradually abandoned mass state enterprise in favor of private commerce, authorities have had to resort to even more inventive methods to keep tabs on women and prevent illegal pregnancies.

    Related: Would You Reveal Your Baby's Sex in a Cake?

    Interestingly, headlines in the U.S. this year have said that China is "relaxing" its birth-control laws. The reports emerged due to possible pilot programs to allow two children per family in cities such as Shanghai and Beijing, where births have fallen too dramatically. But the government denies that regulations are being eased nationwide, and the hostage campaign confirms that.

    Wei loves her country-there's a giant map of her homeland in her living room-but thinks family comes first. In fact, she wanted a third child: "I desperately wanted to have a daughter so my two boys would have a little sister and I'd have a female ally in the family. We were saving up to try for a girl." She was out of time. After her husband's call, Wei left the boys with a neighbor and rushed to the grim government lockup where her brother-in-law Hong-Li, 51, was being held. "The guards deliberately let me see how bad the conditions were. Hong-Li was in a damp, cramped cell with more than 100 other people. There was standing room only and no blankets or food," says Wei. "It was unbearable to see him suffering." The sense of duty toward family in traditional China is precisely why the authorities employed the tactic of jailing relatives. "It was blackmail," says Wei. "I knew my brother-in-law could lose his job if he stayed in jail, and he has children of his own to feed. I had no choice but to comply with the authorities."

    Across Puning county, by mid-April, a total of 1,377 relatives of birth-policy offenders were being detained, state media reported. Many of them were elderly-couples' retired parents who had the misfortune to be home when officials targeted their houses. Meanwhile, surgeons at government clinics were sterilizing hundreds of women daily. A doctor named Zeng told Puning TV: "We are working nonstop from 8 a.m. through 4 a.m. to complete the mass sterilization program."

    In tears, Wei presented herself at her township family-planning clinic-a concrete building that looks plain enough, except for a sign bearing the slogan: "Have Fewer Children. Eugenics for a Happy Life, a Happy Family, and a Harmonious Society." She told officials she would have the surgery, but asked if they would wait because she had her period. (To prevent complications, experts say sterilization should not be performed until at least three days after the end of menstruation.) They refused. "They wouldn't even let me take a shower," says Wei. "Before I knew it, I was on an operating table in a room where three other women were also being sterilized under local anesthetic."

    Today, family life with her husband and two boisterous boys has returned to normal, on the surface. Her brother-in-law was freed (he describes his incarceration as "intolerable," but says he doesn't blame Wei), and he kept his job. Yet Wei can't move on. She says she feels violated, and is still suffering from bouts of crying. "Everyone says it's over, forget about it," she says. "But I have to speak out because if I don't, who will know this ever happened? Family-planning officials locked up hundreds of people and forcibly sterilized mothers , and nobody is even talking about it anymore."

    Related: An American Honor Killing

    She's right. Although Puning's "Iron Fist Campaign" was reported on local news, it made no major headlines in the rest of China or anywhere else. In the two-month period from mid-April to mid-June, officials claimed they had successfully sterilized more than 9,000 women of their targeted 10,000, and planned to continue until their goal was reached. He Yafu, the family-planning expert, believes the central government has hushed up the matter because the Puning Family Planning Bureau's actions were illegal under Chinese law: A 1995 regulation states that relatives of birth-policy offenders must not be penalized, detained, or used to pressure couples. However, he adds, "The central government uses such rules to pretend it condemns extreme measures to enforce the one-child policy, but it does nothing to punish local authorities that break them. It just turns a blind eye."

    Puning officials claimed they took the extreme measures to reduce births in line with national quotas. According to the Nanfang Countryside Daily, a local newspaper, regional Communist Party Chief Chen Hong-Ping had recently come under fire for falling behind with one-child-policy enforcement, and he risked losing a promotion. Chen ordered the campaign to rapidly improve his numbers. "Our mission is to substantially change the family-planning situation to meet targets," the newspaper quotes Chen as saying. Chen declined to be interviewed by Marie Claire, but the man who carried out his orders, the head of Puning's Family Planning Bureau, Liang Hong-Yu, is happy to boast about the crackdown's success. "We have made great strides re-educating the public about the negative effect of large families and overpopulation," he says. "We are very happy with the campaign's achievements."

    For Huang Ruifeng, 39, a Puning native who runs his own agricultural-supply business, the family-planning crackdown has had tragic consequences. Huang is reluctant to be seen with a Western journalist in daylight. He agrees to meet late at night in a gaudy sports bar, where the ruckus of fans watching Chinese soccer on giant screens drowns out conversations. Wearing a crisp peach shirt, he is freshly shaven, but his eyes are red with grief.

    Huang and his wife, Zheng, had three daughters, and Zheng was eight months pregnant with their fourth child-a much-wanted boy-when officials smashed the roof of his family home. They arrested Huang's elderly father and jailed him, to force Zheng to turn herself in. "We begged them to let her give birth to our son first, and promised she would undergo sterilization after, but they refused," says Huang.

    Terrified that officials would force her into a late-term abortion if she complied, Zheng went into hiding. While Huang minded his three daughters at home, his younger brother took on the task of ferrying food and clothing to their father in jail. "Our father quickly grew weak and exhausted," he says. "My brother worried himself sick."

    Related: Would You Survive a Disaster?

    Huang's father had been kept in detention for over a month by the time Zheng safely gave birth to their son, and presented herself for sterilization. "Officials finally released my father. But the day after he came home, my brother, who'd been caring for him nonstop, suffered heart failure and died," says Huang, contorting his face in anguish. Huang believes his 37-year-old brother was killed by the anxiety caused by the ordeal. He is angry at what he calls the "futility" of the hostage campaign. But sadly, he also blames himself: "I had to choose between letting my father suffer and protecting my wife and unborn son. In the end, it was my brother who was the biggest victim of my decision."

    Huang's brother was not the only fatality. The pressure on low-ranking family-planning officials to round up relatives was so intense, one official reportedly died of a heart attack after working 20-hour days for two months.

    Chen Xianye, 28, a young mother with a smiling, moon-shaped face who runs a stationery store in a busy market area, says the campaign terrorized the entire community. "I saw everything from my shop," says Chen, who has one daughter. "Family-planning officials camped out on every street corner and grabbed anyone who had children with them as they passed by."

    However, at least one woman escaped sterilization, thanks to her mother's determination. Says Zhang Xiaoxue, 32, a clothing-store owner with two children, "Officials arrested my 64-year-old mother and said they would keep her in jail until I underwent sterilization. But my mother told me she would rather die than let the government butcher me like an animal." Zhang says she was tormented by her mother's imprisonment, but followed her wishes. "She stayed in prison for three weeks while I hid. She got so thin, they feared she might die, so they eventually released her. They could tell she wasn't going to give in."

    Now her mother is bedridden due to rheumatism that flared up in jail. Zhang says she is eternally grateful to her for standing up to the "government kidnappers." She adds, "The irony is, I don't want to have more children. But her sacrifice showed me that I should be allowed to make that choice on my own."

    MORE FROM MARIE CLAIRE:

    Reprinted with Permission of Hearst Communications, Inc.

     

    96 comments

    • sunshine  •  1 year 3 months ago
      These are they same people that will be running our country when they have all our money and we are broke and can no longer afford to stand up a formable military . We need to stop buying they junk as it is desroying our country
    • Carlos Munez  •  1 year 3 months ago
      To the poster "Sun Nov 28, 2010 12:49am PST", I agree wholeheartedly. What the Chinese police did to the poor guy in this article may have been beyond inhumane and utterly disgusting, but it's their rules and we should NOT interfere in any way. Doing so will only make things worse for everyone.
    • Lana  •  1 year 6 months ago
      These mean horrible people will have a hot place in hell prepared especially for them. Children are precious!
    • Scooter  •  1 year 6 months ago
      f--- ing horrible commies
    • darlingnikki  •  1 year 6 months ago
      All of you making comments about families living off welfare are missing the entire point of the story. The one child policy is a long-standing policy in China to help prevent overpopulation to the point where families would kill their own baby girls so that they could try again to have a boy to carry on the family name. What you are commenting on is a problem; however, it has nothing to do with the people of China. So what would happen if any of you fell on hard times and someone told you that you were no longer allowed to have more than one child? If that finger was pointed at you, I think your opinions might change.
    • LBC  •  1 year 6 months ago
      Did you know that for every person to live the way the average American lives, we'd need 2 or 3 more planet Earths from which to draw resources?

      The point is that our planet is OVERPOPULATED, and we as Americans CONSUME TOO MUCH. China is doing what it can to control this problem - but in a cruel and inhumaine way. Where as America isn't doing anything. We BOTH, China and America, need to figure something out and change our ways, or else this planet is going to be hell for our future generations. We shouldn't even have kids anymore... THAT'S what's the cruelest thing.. bringing another life into this world that is going to hell.
    • Andrea  •  1 year 6 months ago
      communism means no choice......
    • Angel  •  1 year 6 months ago
      Chinese laws are seriously screwed up.
    • Mozayic  •  1 year 6 months ago
      While I don't condone the methods and procedures adopted by the Chinese, I have long believed that here in the U.S. mandatory sterilization does have a place if we are ever to get any kind of control over the rampantly out-of-control welfare system. My proposal is that if you are on welfare, not training for gainful employment of any kind and/or show no effort to support your children, and you have another child while drawing welfare--that is the limit. If you become pregnant again while still on welfare, you would submit to sterilization in order to continue receiving welfare payments. Once can be a mistake; twice is no excuse. Those who do not accept personal responsibility for themselves and their children under their own volition, unfortunately, need to have actions imposed upon them. Of course, implementing this type of program would involve much time, effort, and agony; it will not be painless. Programs will have to be developed to ensure that the existing children are provided for without any funds going directly to the parent(s) to avoid misuse and abuse of the system. But it has to start somewhere.
    • Amy  •  1 year 6 months ago
      Gosh, that's terrifying...
    • Robin J. Sky  •  1 year 6 months ago
      I have to say, that for as much as this story makes me sick, there are some very clear facts here.

      It is the LAW that you can only have ONE child. An invasive, horrible, ridiculous law. But LAW nonetheless. Ergo, in CHOOSING to have more than one child, she broke the law. I'm not defending HOW the law went about being enforced, but it is still a law, and she broke it.

      That being said, I have to agree with the commenter who spoke about perspective. Pundits and politicians have been throwing around terms like "socialism!" and "Communism!" as scare tactics and rhetoric, but THIS is the reality. And no, America isn't ANYWHERE close to becoming a communist state.
    • haaaayaah!  •  1 year 6 months ago
      Personally I think it's disgusting that any govt have this type of control over it's citizens. What are we supposed to do about it though? Should the US go in and fight a war on behalf of the Chinese citzens? Then we would have to do what we always do and spend billions we don't have rebuilding their country for them...Sorry not willing to lose my husband, brothers, and cousins to a cause that should be being fought by their own people.

      In my opinion all we can do is boycott their products. I NEVER by anything made in China and I encourage all to follow suit.

      FYI try studying Geography or Natural Resources before touting overpopulation. It's such an ignorant statement....We are not anywhere near overpopulating the world or depleting our natural resources and neither is China.

      The one child law is really about CONTROL. We will tell you what you can and can't do with your very own body and families and you will obey. How much more personally can a govt affect their population? It also keeps the very people who could overthrow them beaten down. With westernization the people may well just decide to revolt. Much easier for the Chinese govt if when that happens there is only 1/3 of the population left.
    • Wendy  •  1 year 6 months ago
      This law is probably put in place by men who make there wives walk behind them!! I think there weird..this does not surprise me. could even imagine visiting this country..waaay to many people. No room to even breath. BUT kidnapping ones relatives untill she is steralized? Good Lord people!!! They are being treated like animals! Freeking commies.
    • Delco125  •  1 year 6 months ago
      "You could take the entire world population, all 6.5 billion people, move them to Texas, and everyone would each have 1,000 sq feet."

      Cite? Even if that is true, space is only one issue. Resources would still be an issue.
    • .  •  1 year 6 months ago
      Different country, different laws, different culture. I don't agree with the policy but to interfere with another coutries laws and policies is wrong. What right as Americans do we have to force our views and beliefs upon other countries. You don't have to like it, but you do need to respect the laws of other countries.
      You want China to change, stop buying products made there, stop supporting their economy. You do have the power to make a difference but calling China names and saying they are pigs just shows your arrogrance.
    • Julia B  •  1 year 6 months ago
      I don't understand why the men won't get vasectomies. It's so much less invasive and dangerous.
    • Karrie  •  1 year 6 months ago
      What gets me is the brutality of and the Blackmail of the situation as well as the partial birth abortions. I curious to see what you would say about the "Duggars" here in the US, "19 and counting.” I actually think she is on her 20th now. I'm all about having a family, but when is enough, enough? Does society decide, the government, the parents, or is it the ability of one to take care of the child? This is the one thing that I love about America, is that we all have our opinions about what is morally, ethically, and logically right, and we are allowed to express our feelings (without hurting others physically). Everyone has brought up good and bad points on this situation and we are able to be more informed about this issue from different points of view to make our own conclusions. Fortunately there are women in China willing to risk their lives to bring this issue to the forefront in the hopes that something can be changed. As for ME, I still believe that it is a woman's right to choose what she does to her body.
    • Rachael  •  1 year 6 months ago
      The kidnapping and threats to other family members are sickening.

      The sterilization itself? Whatever. What was she going to do otherwise, have more kiddos? All us whiny Americans get up in arms, while we have our acres of land and flaunt our freedom to reproduce like rodents as if it were an accessory. Do we want to get to the point China/India are in now? The world IS overpopulated. That whole "we could all fit in Texas" bullcrap is an arguement made by those who are entirely ignorant of the ecological/social/psychological etc. needs of human beings.

      So she broke the law - an intrusive, argueably unethical, but evidently important law in her crowded, miserable country - and paid the price. That's how it rolls.
    • micki is me  •  1 year 6 months ago
      Everyday I hear more and more horror stories about China and I wonder why we ever got involved in trading with them. The government is cruel and heartless against it's own people even newborn babies. What will they do to us when we don't do things their way? China owns so much American debt I wonder why they bought it all?
    • Kathern  •  1 year 6 months ago
      You know what really drives me nuts-that stuff like this will make it harder for women who want to be sterilized to be able to find a surgeon willing to perform this procedure for them because stuff like this makes tubals associated with something that no sane woman would want.

      This might not be of the same magnitude, but on the other side of the coin it is near impossible for a woman under thirty to have a tubal because "she might change her mind' and she does not have access to the form of birth control that she has researched and believes to be best for her situation.

    Join us on Pinterest

    DAILY SHOT VIDEO

    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.