<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Confusing on Shine</title>
    <link>http://shine.yahoo.com/tag/confusing</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate></pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Hmm. Fergie tops People&amp;#39;s Best Dressed list?</title>
      <link>http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/beauty/hmm-fergie-tops-peoples-best-dressed-list-264277/</link>
      <description>&lt;img alt="Getty Images" title="Getty Images" src="http://a323.yahoofs.com/phugc/BHB9D5MlVjuY/photos/6540d102198dc15c4464e6dba6643fc6/mr_16256a185fa1f3.jpg?ug_____DB3DTQSqf" align="left" height="400" width="261"&gt;People magazine&amp;#39;s annual Best &amp; Worst Dressed issue came out on Wednesday and, well, I feel perplexed. Among its best dressers are &lt;span&gt;Kate
Hudson&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;Anne
Hathaway&lt;/span&gt;, Gwyneth Paltrow, Charlize Theron and &lt;span&gt;Heidi Klum&lt;/span&gt;--all very pretty and well-turned-out, but also all incredibly expected and even a little boring. But the editors also included Fergie in the awesomely dressed category and...I&amp;#39;m completely stumped. I mean, sure, sometimes the Black Eyed Peas singer looks OK in a classic, predictable way; but more often than not, she&amp;#39;s photographed wearing something horrendous, like the outfit at left.&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The magazine goes on to trash the style of...</description>
      <pubDate></pubDate>
      <author>nospam@example.com ()</author>
      <comments>http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/beauty/hmm-fergie-tops-peoples-best-dressed-list-264277/#comments</comments>
      <guid>http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/beauty/hmm-fergie-tops-peoples-best-dressed-list-264277/</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>


<!-- Shine:myservice-us:0:Success -->

<!-- fe2.shine.lifestyles.sp1.yahoo.com compressed/chunked Fri Dec 11 09:19:17 PST 2009 -->
