Rush Limbaugh had better watch his mouth.The Christian Science Monitor published an interesting piece about the power of social media to affect corporate policy and advertising in relation to Rush Limbaugh's Slutgate 2012. Limbaugh has lost nearly 100 sponsors after calling Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke a slut and a prostitute earlier this month. The CSM says, "social media amplif(ied) the concerns of a wave of protesters - particularly women - railing against what they saw as outdated misogyny." They add, "As corporate America reaches out into social media more aggressively to market itself and tell its stories, that action opens it up to an occasional opposite reaction: vulnerability to having the medium turned against itself."
I'm sure even the founders of Twitter must be shocked to witness the enormous effect their platform has had on corporate policy as a result of consumer backlash. But Twitter isn't the only social network affecting change, of course; petitions on sites like change.org are shared widely on Facebook. Because of the different ways users share on the two largest social networks, each site seems to have a particular focus for user complaints. Facebook is used more often as a tool to promote social justice and political awareness, while Twitter, because of the chance it offers users to "tweet at" corporations, is used to voice consumer concerns. There is some overlap, naturally, since politicians are accessible on Twitter and corporations do use Facebook pages. But generally speaking, Twitter campaigns seem to carry the most impact when it comes to affecting corporate policy, while Facebook was widely credited with aiding in the Egyptian revolution, for example.
Related: 10 things I like seeing in my Twitter stream
Twitter and sites like change.org exploded with criticism over the way The New York Times reported on the gang rape of an 11-year-old girl in Texas, essentially blaming her for her assault. The paper subsequently published a critical Letter to the Editor about their coverage but did not issue a formal apology right away. They were eventually forced to respond to criticism and admitted their reporting was biased.
Related: Got apology? California Milk Board axes PMS campaign
The California Milk Board failed with a site called Everything I Do Is Wrong, which portrayed women suffering from PMS as lunatics. The website came down within 10 days of the social media backlash its creators faced.
Twitter went crazy when this t-shirt was discovered on JCP's site/shelves this summer. JCP released a statement via their Facebook page apologizing, then pulled the shirt. Women subsequently took to Twitter offering suggestions to the retailer of better slogans to print on tees in the future.
Related: JCPenney t-shirts insult girls' intelligence, and they're not the only ones
- By Carolyn Castiglia
Follow Carolyn on Babble
For 7 more ways social media backlash has made the world a better place, visit Babble!
MORE ON BABBLE
5 things you do on Twitter that you probably shouldn't
8 signs you're a MILF (Mom I'd Like to Friend)
The top 50 Twitter moms of 2011
Top 5 ways you look digitally unprofessional
The 50 best tweets from celebrity parents
