Madonna's latest adoption saga: Cruel and unethical?

Madonna can pretty much cause a ruckus if she looks at someone the wrong way. It's clearly not a surprise that her efforts to adopt another child from Malawi have ignited more stories about celebrity adoption and whether or not it's fair that wealthy, high-powered families are put on the fast track.

But Madonna's attempt to bring 3-year-old Mercy James into her family fold brings up another discussion: Is it ethical or cruel for Madge to take kids away from their family?

There are those who believe this situation is completely wrong and unfair. I disagree. To know and accept that your child would have a better life in someone else's care is heavy on the head and heart. To give your child up for adoption so that your child can have a life you cannot provide? It's the ultimate parental/familial sacrifice.

When Madonna adopted David Banda, the then 2-year-old was in the care of the Home of Hope orphanage. David's biological father, Yohane Banda, allowed and encouraged the adoption. When he reunited with his son earlier this week, the elder Banda told reporters, "I sometimes shudder to think what would have happened to David if Madonna had not rescued him. I am really grateful to her for saving him from a possible early death."

In the case of Mercy James, the toddler's mom died at the age of 18. It is unclear whether the father is alive or dead. Reports have surfaced that the girl's grandmother and uncle are not happy about the adoption, and that she was persuaded to give the child up when Madonna first met the girl a year ago at an orphanage. But here's the thing: if Mercy was living in an orphanage, how much care could her grandmother and uncle be providing? And would the stability of living in Madonna's home be better for her?

What's your take on all of this Madonna adoption madness? Should they not have allowed her to adopt Mercy James?